Level evaluation of quality of life in patients with bullous emphysema after surgical treatment

Drobayzgin E.A.; Chikinev Yu.V.; Khusainov V.F.; Shcherbina K.I.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20212701112

Drobayzgin E.A.

Novosibirsk State Medical University;
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital;
Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

ORCID: 0000-0002-3690-1316

Chikinev Yu.V.

Novosibirsk State Medical University;
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital

ORCID: 0000-0002-6795-6678

Khusainov V.F.

Novosibirsk State Medical University;
State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital

Shcherbina K.I.

State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital

Level evaluation of quality of life in patients with bullous emphysema after surgical treatment

Authors:

Drobayzgin E.A., Chikinev Yu.V., Khusainov V.F., Shcherbina K.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Endoscopic Surgery. 2021;27(1): 12‑17

DOI: 10.17116/endoskop20212701112

Read: 6314 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Drobayzgin EA, Chikinev YuV, Khusainov VF, Shcherbina KI. Level evaluation of quality of life in patients with bullous emphysema after surgical treatment. Endoscopic Surgery. 2021;27(1):12‑17. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20212701112

Подписка 2026 Эндоскопическая хирургия (Endoscopic Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Having used questionnaires SF-36 and SOBQ on patients with bullous emphysema after surgical treatment in 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, patients have been divided into 2 groups by operative access. 1 group patients — the main one — were performed video-assisted thoracoscopy. Volume of surgical intervention: resection of a bullous-altered area of lung tissue, subtotal parietal pleurectomy. Group 2 is comparison, performed thoracotomy with the same amount of surgical intervention as in the first one.

RESULTS

The analysis of main indicators of the SF-36 questionnaire revealed significantly statistically higher level of quality of life indicators in patients performed video-assisted thoracoscopy. The differences in the main indicators between groups preserved in 6 months after operative procedure. Even in 12 months after surgery, indicators such as vital activity, social functioning, mental health and the psychological component of health remained significantly higher in the first group. The SOBQ questionnaire results showed significant difference in the video-assisted thoracoscopy group.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of the results of the questionnaire survey of patients with bullous emphysema in the postoperative period shows the significant advantages of video-assisted thoracoscopy, including faster postoperative rehabilitation. Additionally, there is required more detailed assessment of the quality of life in patients after various mini-invasive technologies.

Keywords:

bullous emphysema

quality of life

thoracoscopy

pleurectomy

Authors:

Drobayzgin E.A.

Novosibirsk State Medical University;
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital;
Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

ORCID: 0000-0002-3690-1316

Chikinev Yu.V.

Novosibirsk State Medical University;
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital

ORCID: 0000-0002-6795-6678

Khusainov V.F.

Novosibirsk State Medical University;
State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital

Shcherbina K.I.

State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital

Received:

22.09.2019

Accepted:

09.01.2020

Close metadata

References:

Ocakcioglu I, Kupeli M. Surgical Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Pleural Abrasion or Pleurectomy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019;29(1):58-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000595
Aghajanzadeh M, Asgary MR, Delshad MSE, Khotbehsora MH. Data on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with pneumothorax. Data Brief. 2018;20:1053-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.063
Benyan AS, Korymasov EA, Pushkin SYu. Thoracoscopic surgery of bullous emphysema: possibilities and perspective. Tolyattinskiy meditsinskiy konsilium. 2012;3-4:7-13. (In Russ.).
Pichurov AA, Orzheshkovsky OV, Petrunkin AM, Dvorakovskaya IV, Sokolovich EG, Yablonsky PK. Spontaneus pneumothorax — an analysis of 1489 cases. Vestnik khirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2013;5(172):082-088. (In Russ.).
Aljehani YM, Almajid FM, Niaz RC, Elghoneimy YF. Management of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Single-center Experience. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2018;6(2):100-103. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_163_16
Afendulov SA, Moshcin SA. Surgical tactics of treatment of patients with the spontaneous pheumothorax. Vestnik eksperimental’noi i klinicheskoi khirurgii. 2009;2(2):101-107. (In Russ.).
Neretin AV, Motus IY. Improvement of the patients management in spontaneous pneumothorax. Ural’skiy meditsiskii zhurnal. 2013;2(107):80-84. (In Russ.).
Chikinev YuV, Pustovetova MG, Drobyazgin EA, Berkasova IV, Piontkovskaya KA. Results of surgical treatment of obstinate spontaneous pneumothorax. Meditsina i obrazovanie v Sibiri. 2013;6:67. (In Russ.).
Sokolov SA, Kozlov KK, Korzhuk MS, Gershevich VM. Methods of improving the quality of care in patients with essential spontaneous pneumothorax. Endoscopicheskaya khirurgiya. 2015;5(21):19-21. (In Russ.).
Xu GW, Xiong R, Wu HR, Li CW, Xu SB, Xie MR. A prospective comparative study examing the impact of uniportal and three portal video-assisted thoracic surgery on short-term quality of life in lung cancer. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018;56(6):452-457.
Pompili C, Velikova G, White J, Callister M, Robson J, Dixon S, Franks K, Brunelli A. Poor preoperative patient-reported quality of life is associated with complications following pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(3):526-531. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw363
Dias LI, Miranda EC, Toro IF, Mussi RK. Relationship between anxiety, depression and quality of life with the intensity of reflex sweating after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for treatment of primary hyperhidrosis. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016;43(5):354-359. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912016005013
Licht PB, Andersen C, Dan Jørgensen O, Bendixen M. Quality of life after video-assisted surgery for lung cancer — Author’s reply. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):318-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30306-0
Veronesi G, Novellis P, Park B. Quality of life after video-assisted surgery for lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):316-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30310-2
Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):836-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X
Wang H, Shen Y, Feng M, Zhang Y, Jiang W, Xu S, Tan L, Wang Q. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(4):1006-1014; discussion 1014-1015.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.063
Rizk NP, Ghanie A, Hsu M, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Sarkaria IS, Finley DJ, Adusumilli PS, Huang J, Sima CS, Burkhalter JE, Park BJ, Rusch VW. A prospective trial comparing pain and quality of life measures after anatomic lung resection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(4):1160-1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.028
Zeng J, Liu J. A study on quality of life after thoracoscopic assistant lobectomy for lung cancer. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2014;17(3):209-214. https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2014.03.05
Kahn SR, Akaberi A, Granton JT, Anderson DR, Wells PS, Rodger MA, Solymoss S, Kovacs MJ, Rudski L, Shimony A, Dennie C, Rush C, Hernandez P, Aaron SD, Hirsch AM. Quality of Life, Dyspnea, and Functional Exercise Capacity Following a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the ELOPE Cohort Study. Am J Med. 2017;130(8):990.e9-990.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.033
Mahmood K, Wahidi MM, Thomas S, Argento AC, Ninan NA, Smathers EC, Shofer SL. Therapeutic bronchoscopy improves spirometry, quality of life, and survival in central airway obstruction. Respiration. 2015;89(5):404-413. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381103
Fernando HC, Landreneau RJ, Mandrekar SJ, Nichols FC, DiPetrillo TA, Meyers BF, Heron DE, Hillman SL, Jones DR, Starnes SL, Tan AD, Daly BD, Putnam JB; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Analysis of longitudinal quality-of-life data in high-risk operable patients with lung cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance) multicenter randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(3):718-725; discussion 725-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.11.003
Chung L, Chen H, Khanna D, Steen VD. Dyspnea assessment and pulmonary hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis: utility of the University of California, San Diego, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65(3):454-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21827