The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Nguyen D.B.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Manturova N.E.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Sharobaro V.I.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Nguyen H.N.

Institute of Medicine, National University of Vietnam

Hoang T.T.

«108th Central Military Hospital

Ustyugov A.Yu.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Evaluation of blepharoplasty outcomes using psychometric scales

Authors:

Nguyen D.B., Manturova N.E., Sharobaro V.I., Nguyen H.N., Hoang T.T., Ustyugov A.Yu.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4‑2): 72‑79

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202404272

Read: 1823 times

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

EVALUATION OF BLEPHAROPLASTY OUTCOMES USING PSYCHOMETRIC SCALES
EVALUATION OF BLEPHAROPLASTY OUTCOMES USING PSYCHOMETRIC SCALES

To cite this article:

Nguyen DB, Manturova NE, Sharobaro VI, Nguyen HN, Hoang TT, Ustyugov AYu. Evaluation of blepharoplasty outcomes using psychometric scales. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4‑2):72‑79. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202404272

Подписка 2026 Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина (Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Inadvertent perioperative hypo­thermia in plastic surgery. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(1):5-13
Possibilities of using meldonium as part of complex therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease and chro­nic heart failure combined with obesity. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(1):53-60
Clinical effi­cacy of high-intensity magnetic therapy and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with diabetes mellitus and distal poly­neuropathy: a randomized study. Rege­nerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digi­tal and Predictive Medi­cine. 2025;(1):5-11
Effi­cacy and safety of mome­tasone and olopatadine combination for nasal use in patients with alle­rgic rhinitis caused by sensitization to epidermal alle­rgens in continuous expo­sure. Russian Rhinology. 2025;(1):48-56
Treatment of acute hemo­rrhoids acco­rding to the resu­lts of a multicenter obse­rvational study. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(3):112-123
Dyna­mics of indi­cators asse­ssing the quality of a palliative medi­cal care provision: the study in 2021—2024 yrs. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(3):7-13
Acce­ssibility of health and preventive care for patients with bronchial asthma. Journal of Respiratory Medi­cine. 2025;(1):15-22
Vali­dation of the Russian version of the Caro­linas Comfort Scale in patients after previous abdo­minal hernia repair with mesh. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(4):30-30
Prediction and prevention of burnout syndrome in health care professionals in high epidemic risk settings. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(4):51-56
The effect of a gami­fication on healthy indi­viduals’ motor acti­vity. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(4):111-116
Abstract:

The eyes and periorbital area are central to perception of facial beauty and age. Aesthetic surgeries in this area can dramatically improve the appearance of men and women. Blepharoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic surgeries worldwide. Satisfaction with appearance and improved quality of life are important criteria for patients evaluating the results after eyelid surgery. PROM questionnaires are valuable for quantitative self-assessment of outcomes after blepharoplasty. The purpose of our study was to compare the main PROM scales for evaluating the results of blepharoplasty. We reviewed some PROMs, including Blepharoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (BOE), Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and FACE-Q. Studies revealed significant improvement in patient satisfaction after surgery, especially in appearance and psychoemotional state. Introduction of specialized scales, such as the FACE-Q Eye module, made it possible to assess satisfaction and quality of life of patients after blepharoplasty. Despite high satisfaction with postoperative outcomes, analysis of results and thorough assessment of the risk of complications are necessary to improve blepharoplasty techniques.

Keywords:

eyelid surgery
blepharoplasty
questionnaire
assessment scale
satisfaction
quality of life
postoperative outcome

Authors:

Nguyen D.B.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Manturova N.E.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Sharobaro V.I.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Nguyen H.N.

Institute of Medicine, National University of Vietnam

Hoang T.T.

«108th Central Military Hospital

Ustyugov A.Yu.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Received:

15.08.2024

Accepted:

29.08.2024

Close metadata

References:

  1. ISAPS 2023. International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2022. Accessed September 15, 2024. https://www.isaps.org/discover/about-isaps/global-statistics/reports-and-press-releases/global-survey-2022-full-report-and-press-releases
  2. ISAPS 2021. International survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2020. Accessed September 15, 2024. https://www.isaps.org/discover/about-isaps/global-statistics/reports-and-press-releases/global-survey-2020-full-report-and-press-releases-english
  3. Alghoul M. Blepharoplasty: Anatomy, planning, techniques, and safety. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2019;39(1):10-28.  https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy034
  4. Codner MA, Kikkawa DO, Korn BS, Pacella SJ. Blepharoplasty and Brow Lift. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010;126:1e-17e.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dbc4a2
  5. Zoumalan CI, Roostaeian J. Simplifying Blepharoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2016;137:196e-213e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001906
  6. Alimova SM, Sharobaro VI, Shamanaeva LS, Penaeva SA. Psychometric scales in assessing patient satisfaction with the results of aesthetic face and neck correction. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2021;(4):77-82. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202104177
  7. Mukhina SM, Orlova EV. Patient-reported outcomes: an overview of applications. Real’naya klinicheskaya praktika: dannye i dokazatel’stva. 2022; 2(2):1-7. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37489/2782-3784-myrwd-12
  8. Braithwaite T, Calvert M, Gray A, Pesudovs K, Denniston AK. The use of patient-reported outcome research in modern ophthalmology: impact on clinical trials and routine clinical practice. Patient Related Outcome Measures. 2019;10:9-24.  https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S162802
  9. Putterman AM. Patient satisfaction in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthalmic Surgery. 1990; 21(1):15-21. 
  10. Bullock JD, Warwar RE, Bienenfeld D G, Marciniszyn SL, Markert RJ. Psychosocial Implications of Blepharoptosis and Dermatochalasis. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 2001;99:65-71. 
  11. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 2001;3(3):198-201.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.3.3.198
  12. Sarwer DB, Gibbons LM, Magee L, Baker JL, Casas LA, Glat PM, Gold AH, Jewell ML, Larossa D, Nahai F, Young VL. A Prospective, Multi-Site Investigation of Patient Satisfaction and Psychosocial Status Following Cosmetic Surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2005;25(3):263-269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.03.009
  13. Kosowski TR, McCarthy C, Reavey PL, Scott AM, Wilkins EG, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Carr N, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Facial Cosmetic Surgery and/or Nonsurgical Facial Rejuvenation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2009; 123(6):1819-1827. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f361
  14. Scaccia FJ, Hoffman JA, Stepnick DW. Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Technical Comparative Analysis. Archives of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. 1994;120(8):827-830.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1994.01880320029007
  15. Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2001;54(3): 216-222.  https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2001.3559
  16. Herruer J, Prins J, Van H N, Verhage-Damen G, Ingels K. Patient-reported outcome measurement in upper blepharoplasty: How to measure what the patient sees. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2018; 71(9):1346-1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.05.033
  17. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology. 1996;105(6):415-422.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500601
  18. Maycock N, MacGregor C, Saunders DA, Parkin B. Long term patient-reported benefit from ptosis surgery. Eye (London). 2015;29(7):872-874.  https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.54
  19. Çorak Eroğlu F, Kazancı B. Üst kapak blefaroplasti cerrahisinde çikarilan doku miktarinin cerrahi sonuçlar ve hasta memnuniyeti üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Medical Journal of Ankara Training and Research Hospital. 2022;55(1):18-22.  https://doi.org/10.20492/aeahtd.971806
  20. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2010;26(4):303-309.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262313
  21. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Schwitzer JA, Scott AM, Pusic AL. FACE-Q Scales for Health-Related Quality of Life, Early Life Impact, Satisfaction with Outcomes, and Decision to Have Treatment: Development and Validation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2015;135(2):375-386.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000895
  22. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Grotting JC, Baker SB, Carruthers J, Carruthers A, Van Laeken N, Sykes JM, Schwitzer JA, Pusic AL. FACE-Q Eye Module for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cosmetic Eye Treatments. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery. 2017;19(1):7-14.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1018
  23. Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. Measuring outcomes of cataract surgery using the Visual Function Index-14. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2010; 36(7):1181-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.01.029
  24. Chen B, Song H, Gao Q, Xu M, Wang J, Wang F, Chen S, Wu J, Li H. Measuring satisfaction with appearance: Validation of the FACE-Q scales for double-eyelid blepharoplasty with minor incision in young Asians — retrospective study of 200 cases. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2017;70(8):1129-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.028.
  25. Luong KP, Vissers LCM, Domela Nieuwenhuis I, Hazenkamp LS, Hummelink S, Slijper HP, Ulrich DJO. Factors Associated with Treatment Outcome Satisfaction Six Months after Upper Blepharoplasty: A Large Cohort Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open. 2023;11(9):e5260. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005260
  26. Domela Nieuwenhuis I, Luong KP, Vissers LCM, Hummelink S, Slijper HP, Ulrich DJO. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction with Appearance, Psychological Well-being, and Aging Appraisal after Upper Blepharoplasty: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2022;42(4):340-348. PMID: 34791033. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab389
  27. Papadopulos NA, Hodbod M, Henrich G, Kovacs L, Papadopoulos O, Herschbach P, Machens HG. The Effect of Blepharoplasty on Our Patient’s Quality of Life, Emotional Stability, and Self-Esteem. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2019;30(2):377-383.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005057
  28. Told R, Placheta-Györi E, Lackner B, Kuchar A, Brugger J, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Dunavölgyi R. FACE-Q Patient Report-Assisted Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Blepharoplasty Outcomes Using Two Different Suturing Techniques: A Randomized and Patient-Blinded Pilot Study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2023;47(4):1410-1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03339-6
  29. Vasović DD, Karamarković ML, Jovanović M, Stojičić M, Rašić DM, Marjanović I, Kalezić T, Jeremić M. Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Life following Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Prospective Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(3):500.  https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60030500
  30. Hacker HD, Hollsten DA. Investigation of automated perimetry in the evaluation of patients for upper lid blepharoplasty. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1992;8(4):250-25.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-199212000-00003
  31. Jacobsen AG, Brost B, Vorum, H, Hargitai J. Functional Benefits and Patient Satisfaction with Upper Blepharoplasty — Evaluated by Objective and Subjective Outcome Measures. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2017;95(8):820-825. PMID: 28205342. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13385
  32. Ulas B, Ozcan A, Yar K, Kaya I, Binokay H. Evaluation of visual field and ocular surface parameters by clinical comparison after blepharoplasty for dermatochalasis. Journal Francais d’Ophtalmologie. 2024;47(4):104135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104135
  33. Gómez V, Espinoza J, López J, Delgadillo C, Sánchez B, Dulche A, Espriella C, Serna E. Upper Blepharoplasty Scar and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation in a Plastic Surgery Center in Mexico. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 2020;8:77-88.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2020.86008
  34. Saalabian AA, Liebmann P, Deutinger M. Which Tissue Should Be Removed in Upper Blepharoplasty. Analysis and Evaluation of Satisfaction. World Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2017; 6(3):324-331. 
  35. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: A Reliable and Feasible Tool for Scar Evaluation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;113(7):1960-1966. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.