The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Khat’kov I.E.

Ponomareva Iu.N.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii lechebnogo fakul'teta Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo mediko-stomatologicheskogo universiteta

Loginova E.A.

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region, Moscow, Russia

Ulyanova A.V.

Loginov A.S. Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

Ivanova L.B.

FGU "Nauchnyĭ tsentr akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. V.I. Kulakova", Moskva

Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the treatment of gynecological oncological diseases

Authors:

Khat’kov I.E., Ponomareva Iu.N., Loginova E.A., Ulyanova A.V., Ivanova L.B.

More about the authors

Journal: Endoscopic Surgery. 2020;26(2): 50‑57

DOI: 10.17116/endoskop20202602150

Read: 2358 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF GYNECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGICAL DISEASES
ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF GYNECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGICAL DISEASES

To cite this article:

Khat’kov IE, Ponomareva IuN, Loginova EA, Ulyanova AV, Ivanova LB. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the treatment of gynecological oncological diseases. Endoscopic Surgery. 2020;26(2):50‑57. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20202602150

Подписка 2026 Эндоскопическая хирургия (Endoscopic Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Technical aspe­cts of lapa­roscopic formation of gastroduodenoanastomosis (Billroth-I) during distal rese­ction in patients with gastric cancer. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(3):44-51
Impact of various reha­bilitation programs on anxiety and depression after surgery of early-stage cervical cancer. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(5):40-44
Surgical treatment of thoracic esophageal dive­rticula (clinical series). Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(4):89-94
Comparison of the main methods of surgical treatment of patients with colo­rectal endo­metriosis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(6):118-123
Vagi­nal yolk sac tumour in a newborn. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(6):132-139
Imme­diate resu­lts of lapa­roscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: Kimura vs Warshaw procedure. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(1):22-28
Lapa­roscopic inte­rventions in urgent surgery (literature review). Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(2):94-101
Epidemiology of corpus uteri cancer in women of reproductive age in the Sibe­rian Fede­ral District. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2025;(1):36-41
On the issue of the effe­ctiveness of HPV testing and cyto­logical examination in the framework of the combined cervical cancer screening. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(4):23-29
Urogenital endo­metriosis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):61-67
Abstract:

The analysis of modern literature on the problem of robot-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology is presented. The history of the development of robot-assisted surgery, modern statistical data, the advantages of robotic access in patients with gynecological oncological diseases are reflected.

Keywords:

robotic surgery
laparoscopy
gynecological oncology
cervical cancer
uterine cancer
ovarian cancer

Authors:

Khat’kov I.E.

Ponomareva Iu.N.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii lechebnogo fakul'teta Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo mediko-stomatologicheskogo universiteta

Loginova E.A.

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region, Moscow, Russia

Ulyanova A.V.

Loginov A.S. Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

Ivanova L.B.

FGU "Nauchnyĭ tsentr akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. V.I. Kulakova", Moskva

Close metadata

References:

  1. Kim V.B., Chapman W.H., Albrecht R.J., Bailey B.M., Young J.A., Nifong L.W., Chitwood W.R. Jr. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. 2002;12:34-40.
  2. Kwoh Y.S., Hou J., Jonckheere E.A., Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. 1988;35:153-161. 
  3. Marino M.V., Shabat G., Gulotta G., Komorowski A.L. From Illusion to Reality: A Brief History of Robotic Surgery. 2018;1-6. 
  4. Satava R.M. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. 2002;12:6-16.
  5. Satava R.M. Robotic surgery: from past to future — a personal journey. 2003;83:1491-1500.
  6. Unger S.W., Unger H.M., Bass R.T. AESOP robotic arm.  1994;8:1131.
  7. Stylopoulos N., Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. 2003;83:1321-1337.
  8. Ramirez P.T., Adams S., Boggess J.F., Burke W.M., Frumovitz M.M., Gardner G.J., Havrilesky L.J., Holloway R., Lowe M.P., Magrina J.F., Moore D.H., Soliman P.T., Yap S. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. 2012;124:180-184. 
  9. Holtz D.O., Miroshnichenko G., Finnegan M.O., Chernick M., Dunton C.J. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. 2010;17:500-503. 
  10. Avondstondt A.M., Wallenstein M., D’Adamo CR., Ehsanipoor R.M. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. 2018;12(1):93-96. 
  11. Lenihan J.P., Kovanda C., Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? 2008;15(5):589-594. 
  12. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, Cohn DE. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvicaortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. 2009;114(2):162-167.
  13. Woelk J.L., Casiano E.R., Weaver A.L., Gostout B.S., Trabuco E.C., Gebhart JB. The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. 2013;121(1):87-95. 
  14. Damiani G.R., Turoli D., Cormio G., Croce P., Merola V., Gaetani M., Recalcati D., Pellegrino A. Robotic approach using simple and radical hysterectomy for endometrial cancer with long-term follow-up evaluation. 2016;12(1):109-113. 
  15. Conrad L.B., Ramirez P.T., Burke W., Naumann R.W., Ring K.L., Munsell M.F., Frumovitz M. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. 2015;25(6):1121-1127.
  16. Chen C.H., Chiu L.H., Chang C.W., Yen Y.K., Huang Y.H., Liu WM. Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management. 2014;24:1105-1111.
  17. Pellegrino A., Damiani G.R., Loverro M., Pirovano C., Fachechi G., Corso S., Trojano G. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes. 2017;23;88(3):289-296.
  18. Nie J.C., Yan A.Q., Liu X.S. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer. 2017;27(9):1990-1999.
  19. Sert B., Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? 2007;3:224-228. 
  20. Yim G.W., Kim S.W., Nam E.J., Kim S., Kim H.J., Kim Y.T. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer. 2014;55:1222-1230.
  21. Park N.Y., Chong G.O., Hong D.G., Cho Y.L., Park I.S., Lee Y.S. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.  2011;21:355-362. 
  22. Shazly S.A., Murad M.H., Dowdy S.C., Gostout B.S., Famuyide A.O. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2015;138:457-471. 
  23. Gallotta V., Chiantera V., Conte C., Vizzielli G., Fagotti A., Nero C., Costantini B., Lucidi A., Cicero C., Scambia G., Ferrandina G. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy after Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study. 2017;24(1):133-139. 
  24. Cetina L., González-Enciso A., Cantú D., Coronel J., Pérez-Montiel D., Hinojosa J., Serrano A., Rivera L., Poitevin A., Mota A., Trejo E., Montalvo G., Muñoz D., Robles-Flores J., de la Garza J., Chanona J., Jiménez-Lima R., Wegman T., Dueñas-González A. Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation with gemcitabine plus cisplatin: a randomized, phase III study in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients. 2013;24(8):2043-2047.
  25. Nezhat F. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics. 2008;111:29-32. 
  26. Gallotta V., Fanfani F., Scambia G. Minilaparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. 2014;132(3):758-759. 
  27. Nie J.C., Yan A.Q., Liu X.S. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer. . 2017;27(9):1990-1999.
  28. Mäenpää M.M., Nieminen K., Tomás E.I., Laurila M., Luukkaala T.H., Mäenpää J.U. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. 2016;215(5):588-597. 
  29. Iavazzo C., Iavazzo P.E., Gkegkes I.D. Obese patients with endometrial cancer: is the robotic approach a challenge or a new era of safer and more cost-effective management of such patients? 2016;10(2):183-184. 
  30. Stephan J.M., Goodheart M.J., McDonald M., Hansen J., Reyes H.D., Button A., Bender D. Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. 2015;213:491-498. 
  31. Chan J.K., Gardner A.B., Taylor K., Thompson C.A., Blansit K., Yu X., Kapp D.S. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients — a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates. 2015;139(2):300-305. 
  32. Corrado G., Chiantera V., Fanfani F, Cutillo G., Lucidi A., Mancini E., Pedone Anchora L., Scambia G., Vizza E. Robotic Hysterectomy in Severely Obese Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Study. 2016;23(1):94-100. 
  33. Giugale L.E., Di Santo N., Smolkin M.E., Havrilesky L.J., Modesitt S.C. Beyond more obesity: effect of increasing obesity classifications on hysterectomy outcomes for uterine cancer/hyperplasia. 2012;127:326-331. 
  34. Hinshaw S.J., Gunderson S., Eastwood D., Bradley W.H. Endometrial carcinoma: The perioperative and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery in the morbidly obese. 2016;114(7):884-887. 
  35. Brown J.V., Mendivil A.A., Abaid L.N., Rettenmaier M.A., Micha J.P., Wabe M.A., Goldstein B.H. The safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted lymph node staging in early-stage ovarian cancer. 2014;24(8):1493-1498.
  36. Chen C.H., Chiu L.H., Chen H.H., Chan C., Liu W.M. Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer. 2016;12(2):268-275. 
  37. Magrina J.F., Zanagnolo V., Noble B.N., Kho R.M., Magtibay P. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. 2011;121(1):100-105. 
  38. Nezhat F., Finger T.N., Vetere P., Radjabi A.R., Vega M., Averbuch L., Khalil S., Altinbas S.K., Lax D. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complication rates between conventional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the evaluation and management of early, advanced, and recurrent stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. 2014;24(3):600-607. 
  39. Escobar P.F., Levinson K.L., Magrina J., Martino M.A., Barakat R.R., Fader A.N., Leitao M.M. Jr. Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study. 2014;134(2):253-256. 
  40. Feuer G.A., Lakhi N., Barker J., Salmieri S., Burrell M. Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach. 2013;131(3):520-524. 
  41. Magrina J.F., Cetta R.L., Chang Y.H., Guevara G., Magtibay P.M. Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy. 2013;129(2):336-340. 
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.