Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the treatment of gynecological oncological diseases

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Variant laparoscopic anatomy of organs and structures of the esophageal-gastric junction in patients with hiatal hernia. Endoscopic Surgery. 2024;(3):5-10

Socio-economic efficiency of the early cancer detection during the medical checkup. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;(1):36-44

The effect of various surgical techniques in myomectomy on reproductive outcomes (A review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(1):109-115

Da Vinci robotic complex in hernia repair surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(3):14-20

Magnetic foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract in pediatric practice. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(3):29-37

Quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer accompanied by peritoneal carcinomatosis. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;(2):27-32

Rationale for early rehabilitation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(2):18-23

Modelling and prevention of postoperative adhesions in gynaecological and pelvic surgery in experiment: morphological and ultrastructural features. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(2):42-50

Infiltrating Endometriosis of the Distal Part of Round Uterine Ligament and It’s Association with Nuck’s Diverticulum (Literature Review and Case Report). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(2):112-121

Implementation of fluorescent imaging technology in endovideosurgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(5):129-136

The analysis of modern literature on the problem of robot-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology is presented. The history of the development of robot-assisted surgery, modern statistical data, the advantages of robotic access in patients with gynecological oncological diseases are reflected.

Keywords:

robotic surgery

laparoscopy

gynecological oncology

cervical cancer

uterine cancer

ovarian cancer

Authors:

Khat’kov I.E.

Ponomareva Iu.N.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii lechebnogo fakul'teta Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo mediko-stomatologicheskogo universiteta

Loginova E.A.

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region, Moscow, Russia

Ulyanova A.V.

Loginov A.S. Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

Ivanova L.B.

FGU "Nauchnyĭ tsentr akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. V.I. Kulakova", Moskva

List of references:

Kim V.B., Chapman W.H., Albrecht R.J., Bailey B.M., Young J.A., Nifong L.W., Chitwood W.R. Jr. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. 2002;12:34-40.
Kwoh Y.S., Hou J., Jonckheere E.A., Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. 1988;35:153-161.
Marino M.V., Shabat G., Gulotta G., Komorowski A.L. From Illusion to Reality: A Brief History of Robotic Surgery. 2018;1-6.
Satava R.M. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. 2002;12:6-16.
Satava R.M. Robotic surgery: from past to future — a personal journey. 2003;83:1491-1500.
Unger S.W., Unger H.M., Bass R.T. AESOP robotic arm. 1994;8:1131.
Stylopoulos N., Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. 2003;83:1321-1337.
Ramirez P.T., Adams S., Boggess J.F., Burke W.M., Frumovitz M.M., Gardner G.J., Havrilesky L.J., Holloway R., Lowe M.P., Magrina J.F., Moore D.H., Soliman P.T., Yap S. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. 2012;124:180-184.
Holtz D.O., Miroshnichenko G., Finnegan M.O., Chernick M., Dunton C.J. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. 2010;17:500-503.
Avondstondt A.M., Wallenstein M., D’Adamo CR., Ehsanipoor R.M. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. 2018;12(1):93-96.
Lenihan J.P., Kovanda C., Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? 2008;15(5):589-594.
Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, Carlson MJ, Valmadre S, Phillips GS, Cohn DE. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvicaortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. 2009;114(2):162-167.
Woelk J.L., Casiano E.R., Weaver A.L., Gostout B.S., Trabuco E.C., Gebhart JB. The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. 2013;121(1):87-95.
Damiani G.R., Turoli D., Cormio G., Croce P., Merola V., Gaetani M., Recalcati D., Pellegrino A. Robotic approach using simple and radical hysterectomy for endometrial cancer with long-term follow-up evaluation. 2016;12(1):109-113.
Conrad L.B., Ramirez P.T., Burke W., Naumann R.W., Ring K.L., Munsell M.F., Frumovitz M. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. 2015;25(6):1121-1127.
Chen C.H., Chiu L.H., Chang C.W., Yen Y.K., Huang Y.H., Liu WM. Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management. 2014;24:1105-1111.
Pellegrino A., Damiani G.R., Loverro M., Pirovano C., Fachechi G., Corso S., Trojano G. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes. 2017;23;88(3):289-296.
Nie J.C., Yan A.Q., Liu X.S. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer. 2017;27(9):1990-1999.
Sert B., Abeler V. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? 2007;3:224-228.
Yim G.W., Kim S.W., Nam E.J., Kim S., Kim H.J., Kim Y.T. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer. 2014;55:1222-1230.
Park N.Y., Chong G.O., Hong D.G., Cho Y.L., Park I.S., Lee Y.S. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up. 2011;21:355-362.
Shazly S.A., Murad M.H., Dowdy S.C., Gostout B.S., Famuyide A.O. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2015;138:457-471.
Gallotta V., Chiantera V., Conte C., Vizzielli G., Fagotti A., Nero C., Costantini B., Lucidi A., Cicero C., Scambia G., Ferrandina G. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy after Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study. 2017;24(1):133-139.
Cetina L., González-Enciso A., Cantú D., Coronel J., Pérez-Montiel D., Hinojosa J., Serrano A., Rivera L., Poitevin A., Mota A., Trejo E., Montalvo G., Muñoz D., Robles-Flores J., de la Garza J., Chanona J., Jiménez-Lima R., Wegman T., Dueñas-González A. Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation with gemcitabine plus cisplatin: a randomized, phase III study in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients. 2013;24(8):2043-2047.
Nezhat F. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics. 2008;111:29-32.
Gallotta V., Fanfani F., Scambia G. Minilaparoscopic nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. 2014;132(3):758-759.
Nie J.C., Yan A.Q., Liu X.S. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer. . 2017;27(9):1990-1999.
Mäenpää M.M., Nieminen K., Tomás E.I., Laurila M., Luukkaala T.H., Mäenpää J.U. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. 2016;215(5):588-597.
Iavazzo C., Iavazzo P.E., Gkegkes I.D. Obese patients with endometrial cancer: is the robotic approach a challenge or a new era of safer and more cost-effective management of such patients? 2016;10(2):183-184.
Stephan J.M., Goodheart M.J., McDonald M., Hansen J., Reyes H.D., Button A., Bender D. Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. 2015;213:491-498.
Chan J.K., Gardner A.B., Taylor K., Thompson C.A., Blansit K., Yu X., Kapp D.S. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients — a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates. 2015;139(2):300-305.
Corrado G., Chiantera V., Fanfani F, Cutillo G., Lucidi A., Mancini E., Pedone Anchora L., Scambia G., Vizza E. Robotic Hysterectomy in Severely Obese Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Study. 2016;23(1):94-100.
Giugale L.E., Di Santo N., Smolkin M.E., Havrilesky L.J., Modesitt S.C. Beyond more obesity: effect of increasing obesity classiﬁcations on hysterectomy outcomes for uterine cancer/hyperplasia. 2012;127:326-331.
Hinshaw S.J., Gunderson S., Eastwood D., Bradley W.H. Endometrial carcinoma: The perioperative and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery in the morbidly obese. 2016;114(7):884-887.
Brown J.V., Mendivil A.A., Abaid L.N., Rettenmaier M.A., Micha J.P., Wabe M.A., Goldstein B.H. The safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted lymph node staging in early-stage ovarian cancer. 2014;24(8):1493-1498.
Chen C.H., Chiu L.H., Chen H.H., Chan C., Liu W.M. Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer. 2016;12(2):268-275.
Magrina J.F., Zanagnolo V., Noble B.N., Kho R.M., Magtibay P. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. 2011;121(1):100-105.
Nezhat F., Finger T.N., Vetere P., Radjabi A.R., Vega M., Averbuch L., Khalil S., Altinbas S.K., Lax D. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complication rates between conventional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the evaluation and management of early, advanced, and recurrent stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. 2014;24(3):600-607.
Escobar P.F., Levinson K.L., Magrina J., Martino M.A., Barakat R.R., Fader A.N., Leitao M.M. Jr. Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study. 2014;134(2):253-256.
Feuer G.A., Lakhi N., Barker J., Salmieri S., Burrell M. Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach. 2013;131(3):520-524.
Magrina J.F., Cetta R.L., Chang Y.H., Guevara G., Magtibay P.M. Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy. 2013;129(2):336-340.

Close metadata