The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Ter-Minasyan V.A.

National Institute of Health named after acad. S.Kh. Avdalbekyan

Application options of the artificial intelligence in colposcopy within screening programs

Authors:

Ter-Minasyan V.A.

More about the authors

Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;13(4): 66‑71

DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20241304166

Views: 511

Downloaded: 4

Buy for 300₽
Contact the author
Table of contents

APPLICATION OPTIONS OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN COLPOSCOPY WITHIN SCREENING PROGRAMS
APPLICATION OPTIONS OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN COLPOSCOPY WITHIN SCREENING PROGRAMS

To cite this article:

Ter-Minasyan VA. Application options of the artificial intelligence in colposcopy within screening programs. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;13(4):66‑71. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20241304166

Подписка 2025-2 (P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Stra­tegy for early diagnosis of skin mela­noma. Effe­ctiveness of onco­dermatology screenings. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2024;(3):46-52
Arti­ficial Inte­lligence Based Application Accu­racy in Diagnostics of C1-C2 Chro­nic Venous Disease. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2024;(2):132-138
The impact of arti­ficial inte­lligence on double reading of mammograms. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(5):32-37
Arti­ficial Inte­lligence Based Application Accu­racy in Diagnostics of C1-C2 Chro­nic Venous Disease. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2024;(2):132-138
CAD EYE for real-time dete­ction and differentiation of colo­rectal lesions. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(2):50-54
The impact of endo­scopy in upper gastrointestinal tract cancer screening programs. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(2):79-88
Predicting the risk of decreased ovarian rese­rve after surgical treatment of patients with deep infi­ltrative endo­metriosis using arti­ficial inte­lligence. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(3):92-102
Arti­ficial inte­lligence in dermatology: oppo­rtunities and prospects. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Vene­reology. 2024;(3):246-252
Application of arti­ficial inte­lligence in glaucoma. Part 1. Neural networks and deep learning in glaucoma screening and diagnosis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(3):82-87
Clinical and economic effe­ctiveness of the chro­nic kidney disease screening in the Russian Fede­ration. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(7):7-15

The high prevalence and mortality from cervical cancer, combined with the wide possibilities for its prevention, necessitate the search for innovative ways to examine this population of patients to increase the effectiveness of screening. The literature review presents and analyzes current data on the applicability of artificial intelligence for the interpretation of colposcopic patterns within screening programs. The results of the studies presented in the review allowed us to conclude that there are broad opportunities for using artificial intelligence in colposcopy as a component of screening programs for the further management of HPV-positive women.

Keywords:

artificial intelligence
colposcopy
screening
cervical cancer
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
CIN2+

Authors:

Ter-Minasyan V.A.

National Institute of Health named after acad. S.Kh. Avdalbekyan

Received:

24.09.2023

Accepted:

03.11.2023

List of references:

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-33.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654
  3. Radzinskii VE, Aminodova IP, Kryuchko DS. Skrining opukholevykh zabolevanii organov reproduktivnoi sistemy: vozmozhnosti i perspektivy․ Ul’yanovskii Mediko-Biologicheskii Zhurnal. 2018;(3):63-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23648/UMBJ.2018.31.17217
  4. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni LA, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191-e203․ https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30482-6
  5. World Health Organization. Comprehensive cervical cancer control. A guide to essential practice. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014;408.  https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241548953
  6. Wang CW, Liou YA, Lin YJ, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted fast screening cervical high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis and treatment planning. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16244. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95545-y
  7. Rezende GAS, Rezende MT, Carneiro CM. Low-cost interventions to improve cervical cancer screening: an integrative review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2022;50(1):59-78.  https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.59-78
  8. Enaeva MV, Noskova KK. Laboratornye metody issledovaniya v mirovoi praktike skrininga raka sheiki matki. Rossiiskii Onkologicheskii Zhurnal. 2021;26(5):177-187. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/onco111127
  9. Cochrane AL, Holland WW. Validation of screening procedures. Br Med Bull. 1971;27(1):3-8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070810
  10. Savostikova MV, Korolenkova LI, Fedoseeva ES, Pimenova VV. Opyt primeneniya zhidkostnoi tekhnologii BD SUREPATH™ dlya rannei diagnostiki i skrininga predrakovykh porazhenii sheiki matki i raka sheiki matki v Rostovskoi oblasti. Onkoginekologiya. 2018;(4):50-60. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52313/22278710_2018_4_50
  11. Hariprasad R, Mittal S, Basu P. Role of colposcopy in the management of women with abnormal cytology. Cytojournal. 2022;19:40.  https://doi.org/10.25259/CMAS_03_15_2021
  12. Rozemeijer K, Naber SK, Penning C, et al. Cervical cancer incidence after normal cytological sample in routine screening using SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology: population based study. BMJ. 2017;356:j504. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j504
  13. Rozemeijer K, Penning C, Siebers AG, et al. Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(1):15-25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0678-1
  14. Phaliwong P, Pariyawateekul P, Khuakoonratt N, et al. Cervical cancer detection between conventional and liquid based cervical cytology: a 6-year experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(5):1331-1336. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.5.1331
  15. Ito K, Kimura R, Konishi H, et al. A comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology using data for cervical cancer screening from the Japan Cancer Society. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;50(2):138-144.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyz161
  16. US Preventive Services Task Force; Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018;320(7):674-686.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.10897
  17. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for the use of thermal ablation for cervical pre-cancer lesions. Geneva: WHO; 2019;108.  https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550598
  18. Tewari P, White C, Kelly L, et al. Clinical performance of the Cobas 4800 HPV test and the Aptima HPV assay in the management of women referred to colposcopy with minor cytological abnormalities. Diagn Cytopathol. 2018;46(12):987-992.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24066
  19. Bottari F, Boveri S, Iacobone AD, et al. Transition from Hybrid Capture 2 to Cobas 4800 in Hpv detection: sensitivity and specificity for Cin2+ in two time periods. Infect Dis (Lond). 2018;50(7):554-559.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2018.1441538
  20. Valls J, Baena A, Venegas G, et al; ESTAMPA study group. Performance of standardised colposcopy to detect cervical precancer and cancer for triage of women testing positive for human papillomavirus: results from the ESTAMPA multicentric screening study. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(3):e350-e360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00545-9
  21. Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR, et al. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(5):321-346.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21628
  22. Jach R, Mazurec M, Trzeszcz M, et al. COLPOSCOPY 2020 - COLPOSCOPY PROTOCOLS: a summary of the clinical experts consensus guidelines of the Polish society of colposcopy and cervical pathophysiology and the Polish society of gynecologists and obstetricians. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(6):362-371.  https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2020.0075
  23. Abdul-Karim FW, Yang B. Cytologic-histologic discrepancies in pathology of the uterine cervix: analysis of the clinical and pathologic factors. Adv Anat Pathol. 2017;24(5):304-309.  https://doi.org/10.1097/pap.0000000000000165
  24. Luo H, Xu G, Li C, et al. Real-time artificial intelligence for detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer by endoscopy: a multicentre, case-control, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(12):1645-1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30637-0
  25. Antinyan A, Bertonib M, Corazzini L. Cervical cancer screening invitations in low and middle income countries: evidence from Armenia. Soc Sci Med. 2021;273:113739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113739
  26. Porras C, Wentzensen N, Rodríguez AC, et al. Switch from cytology-based to human papillomavirus test-based cervical screening: implications for colposcopy. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(8):1879-1887. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26194
  27. Takahashi T, Matsuoka H, Sakurai R, et al. Development of a prognostic prediction support system for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using artificial intelligence-based diagnosis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2022;33(5):e57.  https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e57
  28. Zhao Y, Li Y, Xing L, et al. The performance of artificial intelligence in cervical colposcopy: a retrospective data analysis. J Oncol. 2022;2022:4370851. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4370851
  29. Ito Y, Miyoshi A, Ueda Y, et al. An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system improves the accuracy of image diagnosis of uterine cervical lesions. Mol Clin Oncol. 2022;16(2):27.  https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2460
  30. Wu A, Xue P, Abulizi G, et al. Artificial intelligence in colposcopic examination: a promising tool to assist junior colposcopists. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1060451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1060451
  31. Kim S, Lee H, Lee S, et al. Role of artifificial intelligence interpretation of colposcopic images in cervical cancer screening. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(3):468.  https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030468
  32. Bajwa J, Munir U, Nori A, Williams B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(2):e188-e194. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0095
  33. Bedell SL, Goldstein LS, Goldstein AR, Goldstein AT. Cervical cancer screening: past, present, and future. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8(1):28-37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.09.005
  34. Kyrgiou M, Pouliakis A, Panayiotides JG, et al. Personalised management of women with cervical abnormalities using a clinical decision support scoring system. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141(1):29-35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.032
  35. Holmstrom O, Linder N, Kaingu H, et al. Point-of-care digital cytology with artifificial intelligence for cervical cancer screening in a resource-limited setting. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211740. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1740
  36. Zhang S, Tong H, Xu J, Maciejewski R. Graph convolutional networks: a comprehensive review. Comput Soc Netw. 2019;6(1):11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40649-019-0069-y
  37. Wentzensen N, Massad LS, Mayeaux EJ Jr, et al. Evidence-based consensus recommendations for colposcopy practice for cervical cancer prevention in the United States. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017;21(4):216-222.  https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0000000000000322
  38. Li Y, Chen J, Xue P, et al. Computer-aided cervical cancer diagnosis using time-lapsed colposcopic images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39(11):3403-3415. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2020.2994778
  39. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. 8p. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
  40. Xue P, Tang C, Li Q, et al. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence system for grading colposcopic impressions and guiding biopsies. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):406.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01860-y
  41. Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. Definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. 3rd ed. Springer; 2015;321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11074-5
  42. Zimmer-Stelmach A, Zak J, Pawlosek A, et al. The application of artificial intelligence-assisted colposcopy in a tertiary care hospital within a cervical pathology diagnostic unit. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(1):106.  https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010106
  43. Zhao Y, Li Y, Xing L, et al. The performance of artificial intelligence in cervical colposcopy: a retrospective data analysis. J Oncol. 2022;2022:4370851. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4370851
  44. Zhao Y, Zhao F, Hu S, et al. Value of multi-quadrants biopsy: pooled analysis of 11 population-based cervical cancer screening studies. Chin J Cancer Res. 2020;32(3):383-394.  https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.03.09
  45. Baasland I, Hagen B, Vogt C, et al. Colposcopy and additive diagnostic value of biopsies from colposcopy-negative areas to detect cervical dysplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(11):1258-1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13009
  46. Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(2):127-157.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21552
  47. Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, et al. The lower anogenital squamous terminology standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012;16(3):205-242.  https://doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0b013e31825c31dd
  48. Tainio K, Athanasiou A, Tikkinen KA, et al. Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;360:k499. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k499
  49. Loopik DL, IntHout J, Ebisch RMF, et al. The risk of cervical cancer after cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: a population-based cohort study with 80,442 women. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157(1):195-201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.023
  50. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021;115. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030824
  51. Guide to AUC ROC curve in machine learning: what is specificity? Available at: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2020/06/auc-roc-curve-machine-learning/
  52. Asiedu MN, Simhal A, Chaudhary U, et al. Development of algorithms for automated detection of cervical pre-cancers with a low-cost, point-of-care, pocket colposcope. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019;66(8):2306-2318. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2018.2887208
  53. Miyagi Y, Takehara K, Nagayasu Y, Miyake T. Application of deep learning to the classification of uterine cervical squamous epithelial lesion from colposcopy images combined with HPV types. Oncol Lett. 2020;19(2):1602-1610. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.11214
  54. Hu L, Bell D, Antani S, et al. An observational study of deep learning and automated evaluation of cervical images for cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(9):923-932.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy225
  55. Yuan C, Yao Y, Cheng B, et al. The application of deep learning based diagnostic system to cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions recognition in colposcopy images. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68252-3
  56. Tan X, Li K, Zhang J, et al. Automatic model for cervical cancer screening based on convolutional neural network: a retrospective, multicohort, multicenter study. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):35.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01742-6

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.