The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Milovanov A.P.

Laboratoriia patologii zhenskoĭ reproduktivnoĭ sistemy NII morfologii cheloveka RAMN, Moskva

Bushtarev A.V.

Perinatal Center of the Rostov Region, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Fokina T.V.

Laboratoriia patologii zhenskoĭ reproduktivnoĭ sistemy FGBU "NII morfologii cheloveka" RAMN, Moskva

Features of cytotrophoblast invasion in complete placenta previa and increta

Authors:

Milovanov A.P., Bushtarev A.V., Fokina T.V.

More about the authors

Read: 2185 times


To cite this article:

Milovanov AP, Bushtarev AV, Fokina TV. Features of cytotrophoblast invasion in complete placenta previa and increta. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2017;79(6):30‑35. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/patol201779630-35

Recommended articles:
Soli­tary fibrous tumor of the kidney. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2025;(3):77-81
Portopulmonary hype­rtension. Journal of Respiratory Medi­cine. 2025;(2):39-44
Bacterial vagi­nosis: modern views. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Vene­reology. 2025;(3):261-268
Impact of trophectoderm biopsy on the course of pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(3):63-69
Study of the role of inte­rleukin-1β in blood serum in patients with acne. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Vene­reology. 2025;(4):421-424

References:

  1. Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66(1):89-92.
  2. Khong TY, Robertson WB. Placenta creta and placenta praevia creta. Placenta. 1987;8(4):399-409.
  3. Milovanov AP, Dimova EA. Disputable problems of the pathogenesis of implantation of the placenta into the uterine wall. Arkhiv patologii. 2011;73(2):54-57. (In Russ.)
  4. Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta. 2012;33(4):244-251.
  5. Savel’eva GM, Kurtser MA, Breslav IYu, Panina OB, Andreev AI, Barykina OP, Latyshkevich OA. Invasion of placenta previa in patients with a uterine scar after cesarean section: clinical and morphological sections. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2015;(11): 41-45. (In Russ.)
  6. Mezhdunarodnaya klassifikatsiya boleznei 10-go peresmotra (russkoe izdanie). 1995;t.1,ch.2:670.
  7. Fox H. Pathology of the placenta. 2nd ed. London: Saunders; 1997.
  8. Fox H, Sibire NJ. Pathology of the placenta. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Eisevier Saunders; 2007.
  9. Tantbirojn P, Crum CP, Parast MM. Pathophysiology of placenta creta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta. 2008;29(7):639-645.
  10. Hannon T, Innes BA, Lash GE, Bulmer JN. Effects of local decidua on trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodeling in focal placenta creta. Placenta. 2012;33(12):998-1004.
  11. Parra-Herran C, Djordjevic B. Histopathology of placenta creta: chorionic villi intrusion into myometrial vascular spaces and extravillous trophoblast proliferation are frequent and specific findings with implications for diagnosis and pathogenesis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2016;35(6):497-508.
  12. Biswas R, Sawhney H, Dass R. Histopathological study of placental bed biopsy in placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(3):173-179.
  13. Earl U, Bulmer JN, Briones A. Placenta accreta: an immunohistological study of trophoblast populations. Placenta. 1987;8(3):273-282.
  14. Stanek J, Drummond Z. Occult placenta accreta. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2007;10(4):266-273.
  15. Milovanov AP, Rasstrigina IM, Fokina TV. Anchoring villi are sources of cytotrophoblastic invasion in the second trimester of physiologic pregnancy. Arkhiv patologii. 2012;74(2):26-28. (In Russ.)
  16. Milovanov AP, Rasstrigina IM Fokina TV. Morphometric evaluation of the frequency distribution and diameter of extravillous trophoblast cells in apparently uncomplicated pregnancy. Arkhiv patologii. 2013;75(3):18-21. (In Russ.)
  17. Rasstrigina IM, Milovanov AP, Fokina TV. Second stage of cytotrophoblastic invasion: regulation of cytotrophoblast differentiation with special reference to the role of endovascular phenotype and multinucleated giant cells (review). Klinicheskaya i eksperimental’naya morfologiya. 2012;(2):59-65. (In Russ.)
  18. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(1):85-89.
  19. Roberge S, Boutin A, Chaillet N. Systematic review of cesarean scar assessment in the nonpregnant state. Am J Perinatol. 2012;29(6):465-471.
  20. Melo-Cerda I. Cesarean scar defect. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2014; 82(8):530-534.
  21. Schepker N, Garcia-Rocha GJ. Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(6):1417-1432.
  22. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43(4):383-395.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.