ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
Efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in adult endoscopic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in adult endoscopic interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors:
Наталья Александровна Барковская,
Ефим Муневич Шифман,
Денис Николаевич Проценко,
Александр Валентинович Боярков

Журнал: Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2026;(4):73-89.

DOI: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202604173

Read: 2021 раз

Download PDF (RU)Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in remifentanil for endoscopic procedures, available data are conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl for analgesia in adults undergoing endoscopic procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine biomedical databases were screened regarding randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving remifentanil or fentanyl as components of analgesia for endoscopic procedures under spontaneous breathing in adults. Primary endpoints included procedural measures (time to induction, recovery and complete recovery, achievement of discharge criteria), incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression and postoperative pain. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis included 16 RCTs (1.242 patients). Remifentanil provided faster induction (MD –1.47 min, 95% CI –2.27 to –0.68, p=0.0003) and awakening (MD –2.98 min, 95% CI –4.25 to –1.72, p<0.00001) compared to fentanyl. Remifentanil provided earlier complete recovery (MD –5.64 min, 95% CI –7.67 to –3.61, p<0.00001) and complete recovery for discharge (MD –22.24 min, 95% CI –26.91 to –17.57, p<0.00001). Remifentanil was associated with a trend towards higher risk of respiratory depression compared to fentanyl, but the difference was insignificant (RR=1.25; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.75; p=0.19). Both opioids had equivalent profiles in terms of blood pressure control, bradycardia risk, and postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

Remifentanil significantly reduces time to induction, recovery and complete recovery, as well as achievement of discharge criteria in endoscopic procedures in adults. However, these results are preliminary due to low certainty of evidence (GRADE ⊕⊕◯◯). When using remifentanil, strict monitoring of gas exchange and readiness for mechanical ventilation are necessary. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine optimal dose of remifentanil, especially in high-risk patients.

Keywords

  • remifentanil
  • fentanyl
  • analgesia
  • bronchoscopy
  • colonoscopy
  • gastrointestinal endoscopy
  • cholangio-pancreatography

Участие авторов

Study concept and design — E.M. Shifman, N.A. Barkovskaya

Data collection and processing — N.A. Barkovskaya, E.M. Shifman, A.V. Boyarkov

Statistical data analysis — N.A. Barkovskaya

Writing — N.A. Barkovskaya

Editing — E.M. Shifman, D.N. Protsenko

Конфликт интересов

N.A. Barkovskaya received honoraria for lectures from the Moscow Endocrine Plant (Endopharm), Russia; E.M. Shifman is a member of the scientific advisory board of Endopharm; D.N. Protsenko has no conflict of interest; A.V. Boyarkov received honoraria for lectures from Endopharm. The sponsor did not participate in the study design, protocol development, data collection, data analysis, or writing of the article.

Дата поступления: 01.03.2026

Дата принятия в печать: 15.04.2026

Дата публикации: 24.08.2026

References
  1. Doi M, Takahashi N, Nojiri R, Hiraoka T, Kishimoto Y, Inoue S, Oya N. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of MR13A11A, a generic of remifentanil, for pain management of Japanese patients in the intensive care unit: a double-blinded, fentanyl-controlled, randomized, non-inferiority phase 3 study. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 2023;11(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00698-9
  2. Beers R, Camporesi E. Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(15):1085-104. https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200418150-00004
  3. Zhang X, Xu T, An X, Wang J, Meng Q, Xu Z. Determining the optimum dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy under Narcotrend and SPI monitoring. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety. 2024;15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241289204
  4. Rudner R, Jalowiecki P, Kawecki P, Gonciarz M, Mularczyk A, Petelenz M. Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003;57(6):657-663. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.207
  5. Yao Y-H, Wu Z-L. [Clinical investigation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for colonoscopy in the elderly]. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2005;25(6):715-717.
  6. Song H-Y, Shen L-J, Sun W, Zhang L-D, Liang J-G, Zhang G-X, Lu X-Q. Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia and sedation (PCAS) with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol for colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(15):E37411. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037411
  7. Ryu JHH, Kim JHH, Park KSS, Do SHH. Remifentanil-propofol versus fentanyl-propofol for monitored anesthesia care during hysteroscopy. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2008;20(5):328-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.12.015
  8. Fassoulaki A, Iatrelli I, Vezakis A, Polydorou A. Deep sedation for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography with or without pre or intraprocedural opioids: A double-blind randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015;32(9):602-608. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000187
  9. Sanli M, Ucar M. Comparison of the effects of adding fentanyl or remifentanil to propofol in colonoscopy sedoanalgesia on visual analog scale and recovery: A prospective double-blind study. Annals of Medical Research. 2019;26(0):1. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.019.01.048
  10. Xu ZY, Wang X, Si YY, Wu JC, Zuo YX, Xue FS, Liu J. Intravenous remifentanil and propofol for gastroscopy. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2008;20(5):352-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.03.006
  11. Mandel JE, Tanner JW, Lichtenstein GR, Metz DC, Katzka DA, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2008;106(2):434-439, table of contents. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000297300.33441.32
  12. Heidari SM, Loghmani P. Assessment of the effects of ketamine-fentanyl combination versus propofol-remifentanil combination for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2014;19(9):860-866.
  13. Rodríguez CBC, Rusz ACI. Physiological variables in patients undergoing endoscopy under sedation with fentanyl compared with remifentanil. Acta Medica. 2025;23(3):231-237. https://doi.org/10.35366/119948
  14. Instruktsiya po meditsinskomu primeneniyu lekarstvennogo preparata Remifentanil. Registratsionnyj nomer LP-N(006578)-(RG-RU) ot 15.08.2024. Gosudarstvennyj reestr lekarstvennykh sredstv (GRLS). 2024. (In Russ.). Accessed June 02, 2026. https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=ed2d97df-2a8e-47dd-b5b0-5fd719689ba7
  15. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, McKenzie JE. Prisma 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
  16. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
  17. Seatable GmbH. Seatable (Version 5.0). Berlin, Germany, 2024. Accessed June 02, 2026. https://seatable.io
  18. WebPlotDigitizer. Version 4.7. Automeris; 2024. Accessed December 08, 2025. https://github.com/ankitrohatgi/WebPlotDigitizer/releases/tag/v4.7
  19. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, Emberson JR, Hernán MA, Hopewell S, Hróbjartsson A, Junqueira DR, Jüni P, Kirkham JJ, Lasserson T, Li T, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Shepperd S, Shrier I, Stewart LA, Tilling K, White IR, Whiting PF, Higgins JPT. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
  20. McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Research Synthesis Methods. 2021;12(1):55-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
  21. Schulzke S. Assessment of Publication Bias. In: Patole S, ed. Principles and Practice of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Springer; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71921-0_5
  22. Schünemann HJ, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Skoetz N, Guyatt GH. Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Matthew J, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6.5. Cochrane; 2024. Chapter 14. Accessed December 18, 2025. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-14
  23. Review Manager (RevMan) [computer program]. Version 5.4.1. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020. Accessed December 12, 2025. https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman/revman-5-download/download-and-installation
  24. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
  25. Natalini G, Fassini P, Seramondi V, Amicucci G, Toninelli C, Cavaliere S, Candiani A. Remifentanil vs. fentanyl during interventional rigid bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia and spontaneous assisted ventilation. European Journal of Anesthesiology. 1999;16(9):605-609. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00548.x
  26. El Bitar N, Sfeir S. Evaluation of remifentanil in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Middle East Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2006; 18(6):1209-1216.
  27. Mazanikov M, Udd M, Kylänpää L, Lindström O, Aho P, Halttunen J, Färkkilä M, Pöyhiä R. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and remifentanil for ERCP: A randomized, controlled study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011;73(2):260-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.005
  28. Zhang L, Bao Y, Shi D. Comparing the pain of propofol via different combinations of fentanyl, sufentanil or remifentanil in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira. 2014;29(10):675-680. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8650201400160008
  29. Haytural C, Aydnl B, Demir B, Bozkurt E, Parlak E, Dişibeyaz S, Saraç A, Özgök A, Kazancı D. Comparison of Propofol, Propofol-Remifentanil, and Propofol-Fentanyl Administrations with Each Other Used for the Sedation of Patients to Undergo ERCP. BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015:465465. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/465465
  30. Kurniawan N, Takdir Musba AM, Arif SK, Salam SH, Wirawan NS, Palinrungi, AS. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl usage in outpatient endoscopic procedures. Bali Medical Journal. 2024;14(1):224-230.
  31. Scarlata S, Scaduto V, Paglione L, Pascarella G, Strumia A, Bruno F, Antonelli Incalzi R, Carassiti M, Agrò FE, Costa F. Remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Biopsy. Journal of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology. 2024;31(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000989
  32. Instruktsiya po meditsinskomu primeneniyu preparata Ultiva® (poroshok liofilizirovannyj dlya prigotovleniya rastvora dlya vnutrivennogo vvedeniya, 1 mg). Registr lekarstvennykh sredstv Rossii (RLS). 31 iyulya 2003 g. (In Russ.). Accessed June 02, 2026. https://www.rlsnet.ru/drugs/ultiva-15066
  33. Glass PSA, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1999;89(4 Suppl):7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003
  34. Komatsu R, Turan AM, Orhan-Sungur M, McGuire J, Radke OC, Apfel CC. Remifentanil for general anaesthesia: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62(12):1266-1280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05221.x
  35. Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G. Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Current Clinical Pharmacology. 2019;14(2):116-124. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567201816666190313160438
  36. Kisilewicz M, Rosenberg H, Vaillancourt C. Remifentanil for procedural sedation: a systematic review of the literature. Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ. 2017;34(5):294-301. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-206129
  37. Venter S, Liu X, Koh C, Solomon M, Cole R, Hirst N, Steffens D. The Power of Prehabilitation, the Reporting of Power Calculations in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Prehabilitation in Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-research Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jul; 106(7):1081-1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.465
  38. Soh NH, Yau CRZ, Low XZ, Kadir HA, Fong WJ, Ramalingam MB, Tan PL, Ng KYY, Hsing YT, Cai M, Seo CJ, Ong JC, Chia CS, Wong JSM. Prehabilitation Outcomes in Surgical Oncology Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):1236-1247. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16527-8
  39. Toneev EA, Komarov AS, Midlenko OV, Golovatyukov AV, Isaev DN. Mul’tidistsiplinarnaya prereabilitatsiya pri planirovanii lobektomii: randomizirovannoe klinicheskoe issledovanie. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2024;1:15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/spno.33265
  40. Skořepa P, Ford KL, Alsuwaylihi A, et al. The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2024;43(3):629-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2024.01.020
  41. McIsaac DI, Kidd G, Gillis C, et al. Relative efficacy of prehabilitation interventions and their components: systematic review with network and component network meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2025:388:e081164. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081164
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Prevalence of lung cancer morbidity among the population of the Moscow region: organizational and epidemiological rationale for a regional model of early detection and patient pathway management.Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2026;29(9):20-26

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: current strategies. A narrative review.Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2026;15(3):44-50

Analgesic efficacy of ketamine in pediatric practice.Russian Journal of Pain. 2026;24(2):100-105

Functionally selective (biased) mu-opiate receptor agonists approved for the management of acute pain. To be continued?Russian Journal of Pain. 2026;24(2):86-93

The evolution of artificial intelligence technologies in endoscopy and an analysis of its potential.Endoscopic Surgery. 2026;32(2):63-72

Relationship between preoperative pain assessment to standard stimulus and intraoperative dose of fentanyl.Russian Journal of Pain. 2026;24(1):39-46

Assessing quality indicators of screening colonoscopy using an artificial intelligence system.Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2025;14(4):56-64

Phlegmonous retrocecal appendicitis after endoscopic resection of a tumor of the right colon.Endoscopic Surgery. 2025;31(6):50-54

Complications in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures on the lower gastrointestinal tract. Collegial discussion of informed consent by the Association of Quality Care Experts.Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2025;14(2):94-105

Acute postoperative pain in pediatric neurosurgery: state of the problem and effectiveness of modern pain relief methods.Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(1):30-35

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12
  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru
  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026