Adaptation and validity of the critical care pain observation tool: a scoping review

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

The Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is a pain assessment for critical patients in the intensive care unit, who are unable to report their pain. This review article provides a comprehensive review of the literature regarding validated CPOT. with the goal of identifying and documenting studies and procedures available for cultural adaptation and validation of CPOT.

METHOD

Search for articles through the main databases, namely PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar. Review and reference checking was performed using inclusion and exclusion criteria. A collection of literature related to CPOT is included in the articles to be selected and those that meet the eligibility criteria will be included in the review.

RESULT

The article search results obtained 13 articles that met the inclusion criteria which presented CPOT in 13 different languages, namely French-Canadian, Spanish, Traditional Chinese, German, Brazilian Portuguese, Turkish, European Portuguese, Polish, Persian, Chinese, Italian, Norwegian and Dutch. All of them present validity, reliability and translation method

CONCLUSION

High reliability and validity between different versions of the CPOT language have been identified. This review provides a useful summary of systematic reviews of CPOT in future research.

Keywords:

Keyword: Critical Care Pain Observation Tool

Adaptation

Validity

Authors:

Endang W.

Hasanuddin University

ORCID: 0009-0005-0517-9593

Syahrul S.

Hasanuddin University

ORCID: 0000-0003-2939-4173

Rosyidah A.

Hasanuddin University

ORCID: 0000-0003-1606-1142

Received:

24.10.2023

Accepted:

10.01.2024

List of references:

Depetris N, Raineri S, Pantet O, Lavrentieva A. Management of pain, anxiety, agitation and delirium in burn patients: a survey of clinical practice and a review of the current literature. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2018;31(2):97-108.
Puntillo KA, Max A, Timsit JF, et al. Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The Europain study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(1):39-47. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201306-1174OC
Elay G, Ozkaya M. The Effect of Music and Massage on the Pain Scales and Vital Signs of ICU Patients with Hemodialysis Catheter. European Jurnal of Therapeutics. 2020;26(3):263-269. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2020.20075
Damico V, Macchi G, Murano L, Forastieri Molinari A. Incidence of pain at rest and during nursing procedures in ICU patients: a longitudinal observational study. Ann Ig. 2020;32(4):407-418. https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2020.2364
Deldar K, Froutan R, Ebadi A. Challenges faced by nurses in using pain assessment scale in patients unable to communicate: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2018;17:11. Published 2018 Mar 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0281-3
Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(9):e825-e873. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299
Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. Assessment and Management of Pain, Third Edition. Clinical Best Practice Guidelines. 2013;1-103. Toronto, ON: Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario.
Gélinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):420-427. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2006.15.4.420
Herr K, Coyne PJ, McCaffery M, Manworren R, Merkel S. Pain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Manag Nurs. 2011;12(4):230-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.002
Brislin, R. W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1970;1(3):185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1993;6(12):1417-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
Salamat, E., Sharifi, F., Hasanloie, A.V., Bahramnezhad, F. A Systematic Review of Pain Assesment in Mechanically Ventilated Patient. The Open Pain Journal. 2021;14:22-31. https://doi.org/10.2174/1876386302114010022
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8(1):19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010;5(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Munn Z, Peters MD, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Gélinas C, Bérubé M, Puntillo KA, et al. Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):142. Published 2021 Apr 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1
Vázquez M, Pardavila MI, Lucia M, Aguado Y, Margall MÁ, Asiain MC. Pain assessment in turning procedures for patients with invasive mechanical ventilation. Nurs Crit Care. 2011;16(4):178-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-5153.2011.00436.x
Hsiung NH, Yang Y, Lee MS, Dalal K, Smith GD. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the behavioral pain scale and the critical-care pain observational tools in Taiwan. J Pain Res. 2016;9:661-669. Published 2016 Sep 15. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S91036
Kiesewetter I, Bartels U, Bauer A, Schneider G, Pilge S. The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults : A prospective validation study. Die Deutsche Version des Critical-Care-Pain-Observation-Tools: Eine prospektive Validierungsstudie. Anaesthesist. 2019;68(12):836-842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5
Klein C, Caumo W, Gélinas C, et al. Validation of Two Pain Assessment Tools Using a Standardized Nociceptive Stimulation in Critically Ill Adults. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56(4):594-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.014
Aktaş YY, Karabulut N. A Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: Reliability and Validity Assessment. J Perianesth Nurs. 2017;32(4):341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2015.12.015
Marques R, Araújo F, Fernandes M, Freitas J, Dixe MA, Gélinas C. Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(6):1075. Published 2022 Jun 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061075
Kotfis K, Zegan-Barańska M, Strzelbicka M, et al. Validation of the Polish version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) to assess pain intensity in adult, intubated intensive care unit patients: the POL-CPOT study. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(4):880-889. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2017.69752
Zand F, Rahimian MN, Darvishi A, Zahedi F, Ghorbani M. A Preliminary Validation Of The Persian Version Of The Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool In Adult Patients Admitted In Intensive Care Unit. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences (IJBPAS). 2015;4(11):151-162.
Li Q, Wan X, Gu C, et al. Pain assessment using the critical-care pain observation tool in Chinese critically ill ventilated adults. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(5):975-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.014
Sulla F, De Souza Ramos N, Terzi N, et al. Validation of the Italian version of the Critical Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults. Acta Biomed. 2017;88(5S):48-54. Published 2017 Nov 30. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6858
Storsveen A, Hall-Lord M. The CPOT — a tool for pain assessment for intensive care patients. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4220/Sykepleienf.2016.59668en
Stilma W, Rijkenberg S, Feijen HM, Maaskant JM, Endeman H. Validation of the Dutch version of the critical-care pain observation tool. Nurs Crit Care. 2019;24(3):132-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12225
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
Harkness, J. Questionnaire translation. In Harkness J., van de Vijver F.J.R., Mohler P.Ph. (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, (pp. 35—56). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2003.
Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003;127-141.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of selfreport measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
World Health Organization. Process of Translation and Adaptation of Instruments. World Health Organization. 2018. https://www.who.int/Substance_Abuse/Research_Tools/Translation/En/
Kazi R, Singh A, De Cordova J, et al. Validation of a voice prosthesis questionnaire to assess valved speech and its related issues in patients following total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31(5):404-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01289.x
Guimarães I, Sousa AR, Gonçalves MF. Speech Handicap Index: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in European Portuguese speakers with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology. Advance online publication. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2019.1711163
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360-363.

Close metadata