ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
Single-portal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbosacral spinal stenosis: a prospective single-center study

Single-portal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbosacral spinal stenosis: a prospective single-center study

Authors:
Леонтий Рудикович Габриелян,
Николай Александрович Коновалов,
Роман Андреевич Оноприенко,
Евгений Сергеевич Бринюк,
Станислав Вячеславович Капровой,
Бахромхон Акбарович Закиров

Журнал: Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. 2026;90(5):16-24.

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20269005116

Read: 611 раз

Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Degenerative lumbosacral spinal stenosis is one of the leading causes of chronic pain and disability in elderly patients. Single-portal endoscopic interlaminar bilateral decompression is a promising minimally invasive method. However, prospective data are limited.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center prospective study included 50 patients with central single-level lumbosacral degenerative stenosis who underwent single-portal endoscopic interlaminar bilateral decompression through a unilateral approach. VAS, ODI, MacNab and GAS scores were assessed. We also analyzed surgery time and 6-month morbidity.

RESULTS

By the 6th month, VAS scores of low back and leg pain decreased by 5.6 and 6.7 points. ODI score decreased by 48.2 points (p<0.001). Satisfactory outcomes according to MacNab scale comprised 80%, GAS ≥0 – 82%. Dural damage and explorations were observed in 4% of cases, and there were no infectious complications. Mean surgery time decreased from 230 to 127 min along with accumulation of experience (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Single-portal endoscopic interlaminar bilateral decompression from a unilateral approach is an effective option for degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. Multiple-center studies with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and compare this surgery with other minimally invasive techniques.

Keywords

  • degenerative spinal stenosis
  • endoscopic decompression
  • single-portal endoscopic decompression
  • surgical treatment of degenerative stenosis
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • endoscopic surgery

Конфликт интересов

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Дата поступления: 24.04.2026

Дата принятия в печать: 20.07.2026

Дата публикации: 16.10.2026

References
  1. Katz JN, Zimmerman ZE, Mass H, Makhni MC. Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2022;327(17):1688-1699. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.5921
  2. Yusupova AR, Gushcha AO, Arestov SO, Petrosyan DV. Percutaneous endoscopic decompression of the central degenerative stenoses of the lumbosacral spine. Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2024;26(4):14-21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2024-26-4-14-21
  3. Konovalov NA, Nazarenko AG, Asuytin DS, Brinyuk ES, Kaprovoi SV, Zakirov BA. Degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: minimally invasive microsurgical methods of treatment. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2021; 85(4):87-95. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20218504187
  4. Grin AA, Nikitin AS, Yusupov SR. Surgical treatment of spinal canal stenosis at the lumbar level in the elderly and senile patients. Russian journal of neurosurgery. 2020;22(1):93-102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2020-22-1-93-102
  5. Hamdan TA, Abdul Hassan AS. Spinal instability following multilevel decompressive laminectomy without fusion for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. World Journal of Surgery and Surgical Research. 2020;3:1193.
  6. Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Weber C, Rao V, Lønne G, Solberg TK, Salvesen Ø, Carlsen SM, Nygaard ØP, Gulati S. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study. British Medical Journal. 2015;350:h1603. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1603
  7. Soares RO, Astur N, Rabello de Oliveira L, Kanas M, Wajchenberg M, Martins DE. Qualitative Evaluation of Paraspinal Musculature After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Study. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2024;18(4):448-454. https://doi.org/10.14444/8631
  8. Liang Z, Xu X, Rao J, Chen Y, Wang R, Chen C. Clinical Evaluation of Paraspinal Mini-Tubular Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Grade I with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cohort Study. Frontiers in Surgery. 2022;9:906289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.906289
  9. Kartal A, Manalil NF, Hamad MK, Paracha S, Robayo A, Wang E, Hussain I, Härtl R. Minimally invasive tubular decompression versus traditional open surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2025;16(1):176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28949-9
  10. Khalepa RV, Amelina EV, Kubetsky YuE. Endoscopic and microsurgical decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis. Russian Journal of Spine Surgery. 2024;21(3):59-68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2024.3.59-68
  11. Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. A New full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 331 patients. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2006;49(2):80-87. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-932172
  12. Komp M, Hahn P, Merk H, Godolias G, Ruetten S. Bilateral operation of lumbar degenerative central spinal stenosis in full-endoscopic interlaminar technique with unilateral approach: prospective 2-year results of 74 patients. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 2011;24(5):281-287. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9f55e
  13. Lewandrowski KU, Yeung A. Lumbar Endoscopic Bony and Soft Tissue Decompression With the Hybridized Inside-Out Approach: A Review And Technical Note. Neurospine. 2020;17(Suppl 1):S34-S43. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040160.080
  14. Song Q, Zhu B, Zhao W, Liang C, Hai B, Liu X. Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression versus Open Decompression and Fusion Surgery for the Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study. Journal of Pain Research. 2021;14:1331-1338. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S309693
  15. Ju CI, Kim P, Ha SW, Kim SW, Lee SM. Contraindications and Complications of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurgery. 2022;168:398-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.066
  16. Trathitephun W, Asawasaksakul A, Jaruwanneechai K, Pakdeenit B, Suebsing A, Liu Y, Kim JS, Suvithayasiri S. Intraoperative Management of Iatrogenic Durotomy in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review. Neurospine. 2024;21(3):756-766. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448346.173
  17. Kamenova M, Leu S, Mariani L, Schaeren S, Soleman J. Management of Incidental Dural Tear During Lumbar Spine Surgery. To Suture or Not to Suture? World Neurosurgery. 2016;87:455-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.0455
  18. Lee CH, Choi M, Ryu DS, Choi I, Kim CH, Kim HS, Sohn MJ. Efficacy and Safety of Full-endoscopic Decompression via Interlaminar Approach for Central or Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine: A Meta-analysis. Spine. 2018;43(24):1756-1764. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002708
  19. Yu A, Kurapatti M, Hoang R, Hong J, Shrestha N, Stadler R, Campbell P, Song J, Lee J, Cho SK. Comparison of biportal versus uniportal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Spine Journal. 2026;20(3):558-571. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0104
  20. Perez-Roman RJ, Gaztanaga W, Lu VM, Wang MY. Endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2021;36(4):549-557. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21890
  21. Chin BZ, Yong JH, Wang E, Sim SI, Lin S, Wu PH, Hey HWD. Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review & meta-analysis. The Spine Journal. 2024;24(6):1022-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2023.12.009
  22. Qu X, Zhang L, Xie Z, Zhang J, Huang Y, Li N, Luo X. Efficacy of endoscopic interlaminar decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):26956. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77337-2
  23. Goh KY, Hsu JC, Lee CY, Huang TJ, Chen CM, Wu MH. Uniportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2021;15(Suppl 3):S54-S64. https://doi.org/10.14444/8164
  24. Kalanchiam GP, Kaliya-Perumal AK, Sampath L, Boey ETH, Oh JY. Complications in Uniportal vs Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Scoping Review. Global Spine Journal. 2026; 16(1):724-733. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251346413
  25. Gatam AR, Gatam L, Phedy, Mahadhipta H, Ajiantoro, Aprilya D. Full Endoscopic Lumbar Stenosis Decompression: A Future Gold Standard in Managing Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2022;16(5):821-830. https://doi.org/10.14444/8338
  26. Park SC, Park SM, Chung HJ, You YJ. Learning curve for full-endoscopic lumbar decompression via interlaminar approach using the learning curve cumulative summation analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025;20(1):297. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05699-y
  27. Machado J, Martins P, Mendes Santos P, Vila Real R, Costa J, Rocha L, Neto A, Bastos N. Achieving Efficiency in Full Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Learning-Curve Cumulative Summation Analysis and Its Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes. Cureus. 2025;17(12):e98634. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98634
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Minimally invasive segmentectomies in primary and metastatic lung tumors: a 5-year single-center experience.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2026;(9-2):33-49

The first experience of intraluminal endoscopic suturing of external gastropleural fistula.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2026;(9):79-83

Endoscopic functionally sparing surgeries for non-epithelial tumors of the esophagogastric junction.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2026;(9):39-46

Augmented reality technology in various surgical fields.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2026;(8):50-58

Endoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with obesity.Endoscopic Surgery. 2026;32(4):69-80

Current trends in the surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease.Endoscopic Surgery. 2026;32(4):29-35

Laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy in children with biliary atresia in Central Asia: outcomes, learning curve and risk factors.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2026;(7):53-65

Classification of minimally invasive and endoscopic thyroid surgery adapted for training specialists in the system of additional professional education.Endoscopic Surgery. 2025;31(5):20-27

The role of minimally invasive transpapillary surgical interventions in emergency abdominal surgery.Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2025;14(2):12-18

The first thousand of VATS anatomical lung resections at the Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(6):7-18

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12
  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru
  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026