The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Mertsalova M.P.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Pronin I.N.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Zakharova N.E.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Podoprigora A.E.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Batalov A.I.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Tyurina A.N.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Shults E.I.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Pogosbekyan E.L.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Fadeeva L.M.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Golanov A.V.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Postnov A.A.

Burdenko National Medical Scientific Center for Neurosurgery;
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute);
Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Rodionov P.V.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Intracellular pH measurement in glioblastoma cells: the possibilities of phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy

Authors:

Mertsalova M.P., Pronin I.N., Zakharova N.E., Podoprigora A.E., Batalov A.I., Tyurina A.N., Shults E.I., Pogosbekyan E.L., Fadeeva L.M., Golanov A.V., Postnov A.A., Rodionov P.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020;84(6): 26‑32

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20208406126

Read: 2553 times

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

INTRACELLULAR PH MEASUREMENT IN GLIOBLASTOMA CELLS: THE POSSIBILITIES OF PHOSPHORUS-31 MR SPECTROSCOPY
INTRACELLULAR PH MEASUREMENT IN GLIOBLASTOMA CELLS: THE POSSIBILITIES OF PHOSPHORUS-31 MR SPECTROSCOPY

To cite this article:

Mertsalova MP, Pronin IN, Zakharova NE, et al. . Intracellular pH measurement in glioblastoma cells: the possibilities of phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2020;84(6):26‑32. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20208406126

Подписка 2025 Журнал «Вопросы нейрохирургии» имени Н.Н. Бурденко (Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Glymphatic system in health and disease: a narrative review. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2025;(4):112-118
TERTp muta­tion screening using digi­tal droplet PCR of collection of 52 paired DNA samples from blood plasma and tumor tissue in patients with glioblastoma. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2025;(5):87-95
Fluorescence navi­gation and endo­scopic assi­stance in surgery for brain glioblastomas. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2025;(6):28-37
Comparison of the effect of DNA apta­mers U31, GR20, GR200 and their combination with radiation therapy on the viability of human glioblastoma cells G22 and Sus\fP2. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2025;(6-2):5-13
Differential diagnosis of high-grade astrocytic gliomas based on CD44, SOX2, and CIRBP gene expression analysis. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2025;(6-2):14-20
Apta­mer-based conjugated mole­cules in expe­rimental and clinical approaches to treatment of glioblastoma. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2025;(6-2):44-49
Overall survival prediction scale for patients with grade 4 brain astrocytoma. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2026;(1):65-72
The choice of radiotherapy dose fractionation regi­men for grade 4 gliomas depe­nding on the status of MGMT. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2025;(1):13-18
Radiation therapy with focal dose esca­lation in the treatment of glioblastoma. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2025;(2):64-69
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To analyze intracellular pH measurement with phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy in glioblastoma cells and to compare these data with intracellular pH in healthy volunteers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 10 patients aged 41 — 67 years with supratentorial glioblastomas. Intracellular pH in glioblastoma cells was compared with pH in healthy persons.

RESULTS

We found a tendency to increased intracellular pH in glioblastoma cells in comparison with pH in intact brain tissue.

CONCLUSION

Intracellular pH in brain tissue can be used as a potential marker of early abnormalities which could not be detected by conventional MRI. Moreover, these data may be valuable to estimate the efficacy of chemotherapy. The study was supported by Russian Science Foundation (grant №18-15-00337)

Keywords:

MR spectroscopy
brain metabolism
intracellular pH
glioblastoma

Authors:

Mertsalova M.P.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Pronin I.N.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Zakharova N.E.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Podoprigora A.E.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Batalov A.I.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Tyurina A.N.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Shults E.I.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Pogosbekyan E.L.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Fadeeva L.M.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Golanov A.V.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Postnov A.A.

Burdenko National Medical Scientific Center for Neurosurgery;
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute);
Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Rodionov P.V.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Received:

08.06.2020

Accepted:

28.08.2020

Close metadata

References:

  1. Kornienko VN, Pronin IN. Diagnosticheskaya nejroradiologiya. T. 1. M.: Izdatel’stvo: «T.M. Andreeva»; «T.A. Alekseeva»; 2008. (In Russ.).
  2. Mandal P. Brain Metabolic Mapping with MRS: A Potent Noninvasive Tool for Clinical Diagnosis of Brain Disorders. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014;35(suppl 6):1-3.  https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a4020
  3. Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, Shibata DK, Bernal B, Zurakowski D, Comstock B, Jarvik JG. A systematic literature review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the characterization of brain tumors. AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2007;27(7):1404-1411.
  4. Kamble RB, Peruvumba NJ, Shivashankar R. Energy Status and Metabolism in Intracranial Space Occupying Lesions: A Prospective 31p Spectroscopic Study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2014;8(11):RC05-RC8.  https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2014/10176.5139
  5. Cadoux-Hudson TA, Blackledge MJ, Rajagopalan B, Taylor DJ, Radda GK. Human primary brain tumour metabolism in vivo: a phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. British Journal of Cancer. 1989;60(3):430‐436.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1989.300
  6. Stovell MG, Yan JL, Sleigh A, Mada MO, Carpenter TA, Hutchinson PJ, Carpenter KL. Corrigendum: assessing metabolism and injury in acute human traumatic brain injury with magnetic resonance spectroscopy: current and future applications. Frontiers in Neurology. 2017;8:642.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00426
  7. Levine SR, Helpern JA, Welch KM, Vande Linde AM, Sawaya KL, Brown EE, Ramadan NM, Deveshwar RK, Ordidge RJ. Human focal cerebral ischemia: evaluation of brain pH and energy metabolism with P-31 NMR spectroscopy. Radiology. 1992;185(2):537-544.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410369
  8. Moon RB, Richards JH. Determination of intracellular pH by 31P magnetic resonance. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1973;248(20):7276-7278.
  9. Petroff O, Prichard J, Behar K, Alger J, den Hollander J, Shulman R. Cerebral intracellu lar pH by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neurology. 1985;35(6):781-781.  https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.35.6.781
  10. Gillies RJ, Raghunand N, Karczmar GS, Bhujwalla ZM. MRI of the tumor microenvironment. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI. 2002;16(4):430-450.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10181
  11. Boyer MJ, Tannock IF. Regulation of intracellular pH in tumor cell lines: influence of microenvironmental conditions. Cancer Research. 1992;52:4441-4447.
  12. Maintz D, Heindel W, Kugel H, Jaeger R, Lackner K. Phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy of normal adult human brain and brain tumours. NMR in Biomedicine. 2002;15(1):18-27.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.735
  13. Kauv P, Ayache S, Créange A, Chalah M, Lefaucheur J, Hodel J, Brugières P. Adenosine Triphosphate Metabolism Measured by Phosphorus Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Potential Biomarker for Multiple Sclerosis Severity. European Neurology. 2017;77(5-6):316-321.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000475496
  14. Wenger K, Hattingen E, Franz K, Steinbach J, Bähr O, Pilatus U. Intracellular pH measured by 31P-MR-spectroscopy might predict site of progression in recurrent glioblastoma under antiangiogenic therapy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2017;46(4):1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25619
  15. Pronin IN, Zakharova NE, Podoprigora AE, Batalov AI, Tyurina AN, Mertsalova MP, Fadeeva LM, Golanov AV, Postnov AA, Rodionov P.V., Potapov AA. Phosphorus (P) magnetic resonance spectroscopy for evaluation of brain tissue metabolism and measuring non-invasive pH. A study involving 23 volunteers. Part I. Voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni NN. Burdenko. 2019;83(2):5-10. (In Russ.). ttps://doi.org/10.17116/neiro2019830215
  16. Oudard S, Arvelo F, Miccoli L, Apiou F, Dutrillaux AM, Poisson M, Dutrillaux B, Poupon MF. High glycolysis in gliomas despite low hexokinase transcription and activity correlated to chromosome 10 loss. British Journal of Cancer. 1996;74(6):839-845.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.446
  17. Warburg O, Wind F, Negelein E. The metabolism of tumors in the body. The Journal of General Physiology. 1927;8(6):519-530.  https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.8.6.519
  18. Fais S, Venturi G, Gatenby B. Microenvironmental acidosis in carcinogenesis and metastases: new strategies in prevention and therapy. Cancer Metastasis Reviews. 2014;33(4):1095‐1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-014-9531-3
  19. Granja S, Tavares-Valente D, Queirós O, Baltazar F. Value of pH regulators in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2017;43:17-34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.12.003
  20. Huber V, De Milito A, Harguindey S, Reshkin SJ, Wahl ML, Rauch C, Chiesi A, Pouysségur J, Gatenby RA, Rivoltini L, Fais S. Proton dynamics in cancer. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2010;8:57.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-8-57
  21. Smallbone K, Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ, Maini PK, Gavaghan DJ. Metabolic changes during carcinogenesis: potential impact on invasiveness. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2007;244(4):703‐713.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.010
  22. Martínez-Zaguilán R, Seftor EA, Seftor RE, Chu YW, Gillies RJ, Hendrix MJ. Acidic pH enhances the invasive behavior of human melanoma cells. Clinical and Experimental Metastasis. 1996;14(2):176‐186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121214
  23. Fukumura D, Xu L, Chen Y, Gohongi T, Seed B, Jain RK. Hypoxia and acidosis independently up-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor transcription in brain tumors in vivo. Cancer Research. 2001;61(16):6020‐6024.
  24. Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2004;4(11):891-899.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1478
  25. Schornack PA, Gillies RJ. Contributions of cell metabolism and H+ diffusion to the acidic pH of tumors. Neoplasia. 2003;5(2):135‐145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1476-5586(03)80005-2
  26. Gerweck LE, Seetharaman K. Cellular pH gradient in tumor versus normal tissue: potential exploitation for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Research. 1996;56(6):1194-1198.
  27. Raghunand N, He X, van Sluis R, Mahoney B, Baggett B, Taylor CW, Paine-Murrieta G, Roe D, Bhujwalla ZM, Gillies RJ. Enhancement of chemotherapy by manipulation of tumour pH. British Journal of Cancer. 1999;80(7):1005-1011. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690455
  28. Raghunand N, Mahoney B, van Sluis R, Baggett B, Gillies RJ. Acute metabolic alkalosis enhances response of C3H mouse mammary tumors to the weak base mitoxantrone. Neoplasia. 2001;3(3):227-235.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj/neo/7900151
  29. Anemone A, Consolino L, Arena F, Capozza M, Longo DL. Imaging tumor acidosis: a survey of the available techniques for mapping in vivo tumor pH. Cancer Metastasis Reviews. 2019;38(1-2):25-49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-019-09782-9
  30. Schüre JR, Shrestha M, Breuer S, Deichmann R, Hattingen E, Wagner M, Pilatus U. The pH sensitivity of APT‐CEST using phosphorus spectroscopy as a reference method. NMR in Biomedicine. 2019;32(11):e4125. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4125
  31. Consolino L, Anemone A, Capozza M, Carella A, Irrera P, Corrado A, Dhakan C, Bracesco M, Longo DL. Non-invasive Investigation of Tumor Metabolism and Acidosis by MRI-CEST Imaging. Frontiers in Oncology. 2020;10:161.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00161
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.