Neurodynamic speech disorders in the acute ischemic stroke

Safronova M.N.; Kovalenko A.V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202312312212

Safronova M.N.

Kemerovo State University

ORCID: 0000-0002-5139-4121

Kovalenko A.V.

Kemerovo State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-3822-1357

Neurodynamic speech disorders in the acute ischemic stroke

Authors:

Safronova M.N., Kovalenko A.V.

More about the authors

Journal: S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(12‑2): 12‑16

DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202312312212

Read: 2202 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Safronova MN, Kovalenko AV. Neurodynamic speech disorders in the acute ischemic stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(12‑2):12‑16. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202312312212

Подписка 2026 Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. Спецвыпуски (S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry (special issues))

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To identify the features of the clinical picture and evaluate the dynamics of regression of neurodynamic speech disorders in comparison with cortical aphasia in patients with ischemic stroke (IS) in the carotid system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We examined 268 patients with a median age of 59 (54; 70) years in the acute period of IS in the dominant hemisphere with the presence of cortical aphasia or neurodynamic speech disorders. The degree of speech recovery was characterized by an increase in the score on the Speech Questionnaire (ΔSQ) from 1 to 21 days after the development of IS. The patients were divided into group 1 (n=148) with a low level of recovery (ΔSQ≤6) and group 2 (n=120) with a high level (ΔSQ >6).

RESULTS

Of the 268 patients, cortical aphasia was detected in 171 (63.8%) patients, and neurodynamic speech disorders characterized by significant variability of symptoms over the course of hours and days were detected in 97 (36.2%) patients. In patients with cortical aphasia, the majority of patients (63.2%) were classified into group 1, and among patients with neurodynamic speech disorders — into group 2 (58.8%), which showed the stability of the regression dynamics of speech disorders (p=0.001). In patients with cortical lesions the impressive side of speech suffered more often — in this group patients with sensorimotor aphasia predominate. In the case of neurodynamic speech disorders, motor and sensorimotor disorders are observed with approximately the same frequency (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

In comparison with cortical aphasias, the sensory component of speech suffers to a lesser extent in neurodynamic speech disorders. Neurodynamic speech disorders generally recover faster and more fully.

Keywords:

stroke

aphasia

motor aphasia

sensorimotor aphasia

neurodynamic speech disorders

subcortical aphasia

Authors:

Safronova M.N.

Kemerovo State University

ORCID: 0000-0002-5139-4121

Kovalenko A.V.

Kemerovo State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-3822-1357

Received:

08.10.2023

Accepted:

14.10.2023

Close metadata

References:

Insul’t: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. 2 izd. Pod red. Stakhovskoi L.V., Kotova S.V. M.: MIA; 2018. (In Russ.).
Shamalov NA, Shetova IM. Kombinirovannaya tsitoprotektsiya v lechenii narushenii mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. 2011;3:12-14. (In Russ.).
Piradov MA, Maksimova MJu, Tanashjan MM. Insul’t. Poshagovaja instrukcija. 2 izd. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. (In Russ.).
Neurology: national guide, in 2 volumes. Edited by Guseva E.I., Konovalova A.N., Skvortsova V.I. 2nd ed., revised. and additional. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2022;1:880. (In Russ.).
Kozlovskaja GJu, Vysochinova EA. Organizacija i soderzhanie logopedicheskoj raboty s licami s afaziej v uslovijah medicinskogo uchrezhdenija. V sbornike: Molodezh’ v nauke: Novye argumenty. Sbornik dokladov II-j Mezhdunarodnoj molodezhnoj nauchnoj konferencii. Otv. red. Gorbenko A.V. Lipeck. 2015;120-123. (In Russ.).
Chuprov LF. Terminologicheskij slovar’ po logopedii i nejropsihologii (uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie). M.: Knizhnyj perekrestok; 2012. (In Russ.).
Engelter S, Gostynski M, Papa S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37(6):1379-1384. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000221815.64093.8c
Marinescu D.C. Post-stroke aphasia recovery: actual understanding, future perspectives. Romanian journal of neurology. 2010;9(4):172-174. https://doi.org/10.37897/RJN.2010.4.2
Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke: Incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol. 1995;38(4):659-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380416
Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, et al. The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke. 2012;43(5):1429-1431. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.647339
Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001;249(5):413-422. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2001.00812.x
Stahovskaja LV, Klochihina OA, Bogatyreva MD, Kovalenko VV. Epidemiology of stroke In Russia according to the results of the territorial population register (2009-2010). Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2013;113(5):4-10. (In Russ.).
Tsvetkova LS, Tsvetkov AV, Goverdovskaya IA. Subcortical aphasia: pro and contra. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture. 2015;9.3(69):1020-1031. (In Russ.).
Prokopenko SV, Mozheyko YeYu, Vizel TG, Nikolskaya ON. Neurodynamic speech impairment in poststroke patients: pathogenesis, clinics, diagnostics. Bjulleten’ sibirskoj mediciny. 2011;2:154-161. (In Russ.).
Kosivcova OV, Zakharov VV. Post-stroke aphasia: clinical picture, differential diagnosis, treatment. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2017;1:10-17. (In Russ.).
Kang EK, Sohn HM, Han MK, Paik NJ. Subcortical Aphasia After Stroke. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017;41(5):725-733. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.725
Paylozyan ZhH. Aphasiology: the stages of development and contemporary issues. Medicinskaja nauka Armenii NAN RA. 2011;1:27-36. (In Russ.).
Konovalova EV, Kadykov AS, Borisenko VV, et al. Pathogenesis of speech disorders in subcortical localization of the focus of vascular genesis. Al’manah klinicheskoj mediciny. 2001;4:11-12. (In Russ.).
Hillis AE, Wityk RJ, Barker PB, et al. Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: the role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain. 2002;125(5):1094-1104. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf113
Kuljic‐Obradovic DC. Subcortical aphasia: three different language disorder syndromes? European Journal of Neurology. 2003;10(4):445-448. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00604.x
Mega MS, Alexander MP. Subcortical aphasia: the core profile of capsulostriatal infarction. Neurology. 1994;44(10):1824-1829. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.44.10.1824
Konstantinova JuO. Osobennosti differencial’noj diagnostiki dinamicheskoj afazii i rechevoj adinamii: konceptual’nyj analiz. V sbornike: Nauchnaja iniciativa v psihologii. Mezhvuzovskij sbornik nauchnyh trudov studentov i molodyh uchenyh. Pod red. Gavriljuka V.P. Kursk. 2020;154-163. (In Russ.).
Krishnan G, Tiwari S, Pai AR, Rao SN. Variability in aphasia following subcortical hemorrhagic lesion. Ann Neurosci. 2012;19(4):158-160. https://doi.org/10.5214/ans.0972.7531.190404
Bouvier L, Groulx B, Martel-Sauvageau V, Monetta L. Language disturbances after non-thalamic subcortical stroke: a review of the literature. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2017;15(2):173-184. https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2017.0666
Mozhejko EYu. Recovery of speech disorders in poststroke patients: the urgency, problems and prospects. Sibirskoe medicinskoe obozrenie. 2008;2(50):16-20. (In Russ.).