The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Filippov M.S.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department

Pogonchenkova I.V.

Spasokukotsky Moscow Scientific Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine

Kostenko E.V.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department;
The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov

Rassulova M.A.

Spasokukotsky Moscow Scientific Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine

Makarova M.R.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department

Egorov P.D.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department

Ideomotor training combining the use with integrated application of electromyostimulation and a robotic brain-computer interface in post-stroke upper limb dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial

Authors:

Filippov M.S., Pogonchenkova I.V., Kostenko E.V., Rassulova M.A., Makarova M.R., Egorov P.D.

More about the authors

Journal: Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2025;102(5): 5‑19

DOI: 10.17116/kurort20251020515

Read: 1456 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

IDEOMOTOR TRAINING COMBINING THE USE WITH INTEGRATED APPLICATION OF ELECTROMYOSTIMULATION AND A ROBOTIC BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE IN POST-STROKE UPPER LIMB DYSFUNCTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
IDEOMOTOR TRAINING COMBINING THE USE WITH INTEGRATED APPLICATION OF ELECTROMYOSTIMULATION AND A ROBOTIC BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE IN POST-STROKE UPPER LIMB DYSFUNCTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

To cite this article:

Filippov MS, Pogonchenkova IV, Kostenko EV, Rassulova MA, Makarova MR, Egorov PD. Ideomotor training combining the use with integrated application of electromyostimulation and a robotic brain-computer interface in post-stroke upper limb dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2025;102(5):5‑19. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort20251020515

Подписка 2026 Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры (Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Promising models of sana­torium-resort provision orga­nization in the Armed Forces of the Russian Fede­ration. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2025;(1):5-11
Effe­ctiveness of muscles’ preoperative preparation for reco­nstruction of ante­rior cruciate liga­ment of knee. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2025;(1):51-57
Adju­vant pharmacological modu­lation with Cyto­flavin in reha­bilitation at stages 2—3 in patients with acute cere­bral insu­fficiency and post-intensive care syndrome. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(3):78-85
Anesthetic mana­gement of endo­vascular procedures in patients with ischemic stroke. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(2):20-25
Comparison of fluoroscopy and intracardiac echo­cardiography for control of endo­vascular closure of patent fora­men ovale. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(1):64-69
Mathematical mode­ling of outcomes in patients with clinical combination of ischemic stroke and COVID-19 complicated by multiple organ failure. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(3):42-49
Socio-economic damage caused by elevated low-density lipo­protein cholesterol levels. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2025;(2):88-98
Proinflammatory cyto­kines — as a marker of the effe­ctiveness of neuroprotection in children with peri­natal nervous system damage. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):62-66
Cere­brolysin with repe­rfusion therapy in ischemic stroke: a prospective analysis of multimodal brain imaging data from the CERE­HETIS trial. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):84-98
Prediction of mortality in severe ischemic stroke during COVID-19 in patients with multiorgan dysfunction. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):120-127
Abstract:

One of the leading causes that disrupt human interaction with the environment is upper limb (UL) dysfunction, which develops in 48—77% of cases after a stroke. The combination of electromyostimulation (EMS) with neurocomputer interface (NCI) technology demonstrates the greatest clinical effectiveness among various types of sensorimotor BOS, the study of which seems promising.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of combined use the integrated of EMS and robotic NCI on the functioning of UL in post-stroke spastic paresis in the early recovery period of ischemic stroke (IS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized controlled trial involved 120 patients in the early recovery period of IS with moderate to severe spastic paresis of UL, with an average age of 57.43±3.68 years. By simple randomization, the patients were divided into 4 groups of 30 people each, depending on the medical rehabilitation program (MR). All patients received a basic MR program: therapeutic gymnastics for 30 minutes; magnetic field therapy on the neck and collar area for 20 minutes; therapeutic massage for 20 minutes. The patients of the control group (GC) received only the basic program; The main group (MG) — interval complex multi-purpose EMS of the agonist muscles and antagonist muscles of the forearm in combination with the use of NCI with exoskeletons of both hands; comparison group 1 (CG-1) — training using a robotic NCI; comparison group 2 (CG-2) — EMS. The duration of the MR course is 2 weeks, daily, 5 days a week, 10 treatments for each factor. The effectiveness of MR was evaluated at three control points (T): after completion of 5 procedures (T1) and 10 procedures (T2), 3 months after completion of MR (T3). Assessment tools: Medical Research Committee Scale (MRCs), Modified Ashworth Scale (mAs), The Fugl—Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE), The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT).

RESULTS

Patients with MG demonstrated significant (p<0.05) positive dynamics of recovery of UL function at the end of the MR course and after 3 months. The increase in muscle strength in MG and CG-1 averaged 0.77 and 0.59 points (p<0.05) in the distal muscle group, in CG-2 (0.24 points) and GC (0.21 points), p>0.05 compared with baseline values. Only patients with MG (+7.7 points) achieved a clinically significant difference (Δ) in FMA-UE-total at the end of MR, while patients with CG-1 achieved Δ=+4.9 points. In patients with GC and CG-2, the values of Δ according to FMA-UE-total were comparable (+2.3 and 2.6 points, respectively). According to the ARAT test, only MG patients also achieved a clinically significant difference (+6.2 points). Patients with CG-1 — Δ=+3.5 points. In patients with GC and CG-2, Δ values were comparable (+1.3 and 2.2 points, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Ideomotor training with EMS in MR of impaired VC function in patients with IS, combining stimulation of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive analyzers with training of cognitive functions, promotes regression of sensorimotor disorders of UL and restoration of manipulative activity.

Keywords:

medical rehabilitation
ischemic stroke
electromyostimulation
brain-computer interface
hand exoskeleton

Authors:

Filippov M.S.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department

Pogonchenkova I.V.

Spasokukotsky Moscow Scientific Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine

Kostenko E.V.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department;
The Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov

Rassulova M.A.

Spasokukotsky Moscow Scientific Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine

Makarova M.R.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department

Egorov P.D.

Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department

Received:

01.10.2025

Accepted:

13.10.2025

Close metadata

References:

  1. Bushkova YuV, Ivanova GE, Stakhovskaya LV, Frolov AA. Brain–computer interface technology as a controlled ideomotor training in rehabilitation of patients after stroke. Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University. 2019; 6:28-34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24075/vrgmu.2019.078
  2. Levin OS, Bogolepova AN. Poststroke motor and cognitive impairments: clinical features and current approaches to rehabilitation. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020;120(11):99-107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202012011199/
  3. Kostenko EV, Petrova LV, Martynov MYu, Pogonchenkova IV. Effectiveness of rehabilitation with virtual reality and biofeedback in restoring hand function after stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(3 vol. 2):68-75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202312303268
  4. Nojima I, Sugata H, Takeuchi H, Mima T. Brain-Computer Interface Training Based on Brain Activity Can Induce Motor Recovery in Patients With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Feb;36(2):83-96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683211062895
  5. Peksa J, Mamchur D. State-of-the-Art on Brain-Computer Interface Technology. Sensors (Basel). 2023;Jun 28;23(13):6001. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136001
  6. Piradov MA, Maksimova MYu, Tanashyan MM. Stroke: step-by-step instruc tions. Guide for doctors. 2nd ed, revised and enlarged. Moscow: GEOTAR Media; 2020. (In Russ.).
  7. Lieshout ECCV, van de Port IG, Dijkhuizen RM, Visser-Meily JMA. Does upper limb strength play a prominent role in health-related quality of life in stroke patients discharged from inpatient rehabilitation? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020 Oct;27(7):525-533.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2020.1738662
  8. Espenhahn S, Rossiter HE, van Wijk BCM, et al. Sensorimotor cortex beta oscillations reflect motor skill learning ability after stroke. Brain Commun. 2020 Oct;2(2):fcaa161. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa161
  9. Khatkova SE, Kostenko EV, Akulov MA, Diaghileva VP, Nikolaev EA, Balbert AA, Orlova AS. Heterogeneity of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the development of spasticity syndrome in various central nervous system disease. Pharmateca. 2020;27(3):26-37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2020.3.26-37
  10. Edwards LL, King EM, Buetefisch CM, Borich MR. Putting the «Sensory» Into Sensorimotor Control: The Role of Sensorimotor Integration in Goal-Directed Hand Movements After Stroke. Front Integr Neurosci. 2019;22;13:16.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2019.00016
  11. Mahoney JR, Verghese J. Does Cognitive Impairment Influence Visual-Somatosensory Integration and Mobility in Older Adults? The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2020;75(3):581-588.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz117
  12. Jacquey L, Baldassarre G, Santucci VG, O’Regan JK. Sensorimotor Contingencies as a Key Drive of Development: From Babies to Robots. Frontiers in neurorobotics. 2019;13:98.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2019.00098
  13. Luft AR, Buitrago MM, Ringer T, et al. Motorskill learning depends on protein synthesis in motor cortex after training. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2004;24(29):6515-6520. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1034-04.2004
  14. Bertolucci F, Chisari C, Fregni F. The potential dual role of transcallosal inhibition in post-stroke motor recovery. Rest. Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36:83-97.  https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-170778
  15. Sasmita AO, Kuruvilla J, Ling APK. Harnessing neuroplasticity: modern approaches and clinical future. Int J Neurosci. 2018 Nov;128(11):1061-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2018.1466781
  16. Johnson BP, Cohen LG. Applied strategies of neuroplasticity. Handb Clin Neurol. 2023;196:599-609.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98817-9.00011-9
  17. Kotov SV, Isakova EV, Zaitseva EV, Egorova YuV. Multimodal stimulation in the neurorehabilitation of patients with poststroke cognitive impairment. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020;120(5):125-130. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2020120051125
  18. Premchand B, Zhang Z, Ang KK, et al. A Personalized Multimodal BCI-Soft Robotics System for Rehabilitating Upper Limb Function in Chronic Stroke Patients. Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Feb;10(2):94.  https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10020094
  19. Kostenko EV, Petrova LV, Pogonchenkova IV, Neprintseva NV, Shurupova ST, Kopasheva VD, Rylsky AV. Innovative technologies and multimodal correction in medical rehabilitation of motor and neuropsychological disturbances due to stroke. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2022;99(6):67-78. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort20229906167
  20. Gnasso R, Palermi S, Picone A, et al. Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation for Post-Stroke Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct;23(19):8239. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198239
  21. Chivukula S, Jafari M, Aflalo T, et al. Cognition in Sensorimotor Control: Interfacing With the Posterior Parietal Cortex. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:140.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00140
  22. Pulliam CL, Stanslaski SR, Denison TJ. Industrial perspectives on brain-computer interface technology. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168:341-352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63934-9.00025-1.
  23. Johnson BP, Cohen LG. Applied strategies of neuroplasticity. Handb Clin Neurol. 2023;196:599-609.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98817-9.00011-9
  24. Pankov MYu, Kostenko EV, Petrova LV, Filippov MS. The brain-computer interface in the recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika=Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2025;17(2):93-99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2025-2-93-99
  25. Manguerra MV, Baniqued PDE, Abad AC, et al. Active motor control for an upper extremity exoskeleton. Adv Sci Lett. 2018;24:9937-8840. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12357.
  26. Teplan M. Fundamentals of EEG Measurement. IEEE Measurement Science Review. 2002;2:1-11. 
  27. Graimann B, Allison B, Pfurtscheller G. Brain-computer interfaces: a gentle introduction. In: Graimann B, Pfurtscheller G, Allison B, editors. Brain-Computer Interfaces: Revolutionizing Human-Computer Interaction https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02091-9_1
  28. Li M, Xu G, Xie J, Chen C. A review: Motor rehabilitation after stroke with control based on human intent. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Apr;232(4):344-360.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918755828
  29. Medvedeva AS, Syrov NV, Yakovlev LV, Alieva YaA, Petrova DA, Ivanova GE, Lebedev MA, Kaplan AYa. Motion-related desynchronization of sensorimotor EEG rhythms in patients with hemiparesis as a result of stroke. IM. Sechenov Russian Journal of Physiology. 2024;110(10):1683-1700. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869813924100084
  30. Hosp JA, Mann S, Wegenast-Braun BM, et al. Region and task-specific activation of arc in primary motor cortex of rats following motor skill learning. Neuroscience. 2013;250:557-564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.06.060
  31. Li D, Li R, Song Y, et al. Effects of brain-computer interface based training on post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation: a meta-analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Mar;22(1):44.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01588-x
  32. Xie YL, Yang YX, Jiang H, et al. Brain-machine interface-based training for improving upper extremity function after stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug;16:949575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.949575
  33. Patent No. 2844844 C1 Russian Federation, IPC A61H 1/00, A61N 1/00. A method for restoring upper limb movements after an ischemic stroke using combined electromyostimulation and bimanual robotic mechanotherapy with brain-computer interface technology:application 07/04/2024:published on 08/07/2025/EV. Kostenko, IV. Pogonchenkova, LV. Petrova, GM. Lutokhin, MS. Filippov [et al.]; the applicant is the State Autonomous Healthcare Institution of the Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine named after SI. Spasokukotsky Department of Health of the city of Moscow. (In Russ.).
  34. Chasiotis A, Giannopapas V, Papadopoulou M, et al. The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Post-stroke Spasticity: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2022 Nov;14(11):e32001. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32001
  35. Ponomarenko GN. Physical and rehabilitation medicine: fundamental principles and clinical practice. Physiotherapy, balneology and rehabilitation. 2016;6:284-289. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1681-3456-2016-15-6-284-289
  36. Baklushina EA, Yastrebtseva IP. Electromyostimulation in neurorehabilitation. Fizioterapiya, bal’neologiya i reabilutatsiya. 2016;15(1):49-54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1681-3456-2016-15-1-49-54
  37. Khan MA, Fares H, Ghayvat H, et al. A systematic review on functional electrical stimulation based rehabilitation systems for upper limb post-stroke recovery. Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 8;14:1272992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1272992
  38. Order No. 364 of the Moscow City Department of Health dated 04/27/2024 On the Clinical Protocol for the Medical Rehabilitation of patients with post-stroke upper limb dysfunction using multimodal technologies in medical organizations of the Moscow City Public health System. Accessed April 14,2025. (In Russ.). https://cmrvsm.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Prikaz-DZM-02.05.24_EDO-2000_Hripun_AI._Arakelov_SE.pdf?ysclid=mbwgrravh7266813172
  39. Frolov A, Husek D, Bobrov PD, Korshakov A, Chernikova L, Konovalov R, Mokienko O. Sources of EEG activity most relevant to performance of brain-computer interface based on motor imagery. Neural Network World. 2012;22(1):21-37.  https://doi.org10.14311/Nnw.2012.22.002
  40. van der Ploeg RJ, Oosterhuis HJ. Fysische diagnostiek--het meten van spierkracht Physicalexamination--measurementofmusclestrength].NedTijdschrGeneeskd.2001Jan;145(1):19-23.
  41. Suponeva NA, Yusupova DG, Ilyina KA, Melchenko DA, Butkovskaya AA, Zhirova ES, Taratukhina AS, Zimin AA, Zaitsev AB, Klochkov AS, Lyukmanov RKh, Kotov-Smolensky AM, Khizhnikova AE, Gatina GA, Kutlubaev MA, Piradov MA. Validation of the Modified Ashworth Scale In Russia. Annals of clinical and experimental Neurology. 2020;14(1):89-96. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25692/ACEN.2020.1.10
  42. Suponeva NA, Yusupova DG, Zimin AA, Rimkevicius AA, Melchenko DA, Ilyina KA, Zhirova ES, Taratukhina AS, Zaitsev AB, Klochkov AS, Lyukmanov RKh, Kotov-Smolensky AM, Khizhnikova AE, Gatina GA, Kutlubaev MA, Piradov MA. Validation of the Russian version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Physical Performance for assessment of patients with post-stroke paresis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2021;121(8-2):86-90. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202112108286
  43. Lyle Ronald C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 1981;4(4):483-492.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001
  44. Fu J, Chen S, Jia J. Sensorimotor Rhythm-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Motor Tasks Used in Hand Upper Extremity Rehabilitation after Stroke: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2022 Dec;13(1):56.  https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13010056
  45. Kruse A, Suica Z, Taeymans J, Schuster-Amft C. Effect of brain-computer interface training based on non-invasive electroencephalography using motor imagery on functional recovery after stroke — a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2020 Oct;20(1):385.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01960-5
  46. Monge-Pereira E, Ibañez-Pereda J, Alguacil-Diego IM, et al. Use of Electroencephalography Brain-Computer Interface Systems as a Rehabilitative Approach for Upper Limb Function After a Stroke: A Systematic Review. PM R. 2017 Sep;9(9):918-932.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.04.016.
  47. Ren C, Li X, Gao Q, et al. The effect of brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation training on rehabilitation of upper limb after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep;18:1438095. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1438095
  48. Mansour S, Ang KK, Nair KPS, et al. Efficacy of Brain-Computer Interface and the Impact of Its Design Characteristics on Poststroke Upper-limb Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2022 Jan;53(1):79-90.  https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594211009065
  49. Chung E, Lee BH, Hwang S. Therapeutic effects of brain-computer interface-controlled functional electrical stimulation training on balance and gait performance for stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec;99(51):e22612. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022612
  50. Bai Z, Fong KNK, Zhang JJ, et al. Immediate and long-term effects of BCI-based rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Apr;17(1):57.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00686-2
  51. Biasiucci A, Leeb R, Iturrate I, et al. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):2421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z
  52. Patel P, Kaingade SR, Wilcox A, Lodha N. Force control predicts fine motor dexterity in high-functioning stroke survivors. Neurosci Lett. 2020;729:135015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135015
  53. Antipov VM, Smirnov NM, Badarin AA, Kiselev AR, Andreev AV, Kurkin SA, Hramov AE, Drapkina OM. The use of brain–computer interfaces for personalized neurorehabilitation: the role of subjective perception and neurophysiological indicators. The doctor and information technology. 2025;(2):84-97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25881/18110193_2025_2_84
  54. Rubakova AA, Ivanova GE, Bulatova MA. Activation of sensorimotor integration processes using the brain-computer interface. Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University. 2021;(5):29-35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24075/vrgmu.2021.039
  55. Mazurek KA, Richardson D, Abraham N, et al. Utilizing High-Density Electroencephalography and Motion Capture Technology to Characterize Sensorimotor Integration While Performing Complex Actions. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2020;28(1):287-296.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2941574
  56. Norman SL, McFarland DJ, Miner A, et al. Controlling pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm can improve finger extension after stroke. Journal of neural engineering. 2018;15(5):056026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aad724
  57. Gassert R, Dietz V. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective. Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):46.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0383-x
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.