The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Naumova I.V.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Voevodina K.I.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Kunitsyna V.G.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Pashkov A.V.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia;
Central State Medical Academy of Administrative Directorate of the President of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Rubinshtein P.A.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Namazova-Baranova L.S.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Vorobyeva P.L.

Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Pure-tone audiometry and ASSR to acoustic stimulation as predictors of speech intelligibility in ci-users

Authors:

Naumova I.V., Voevodina K.I., Kunitsyna V.G., Pashkov A.V., Rubinshtein P.A., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Vorobyeva P.L.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2026;91(2): 12‑18

Read: 309 times


To cite this article:

Naumova IV, Voevodina KI, Kunitsyna VG, Pashkov AV, Rubinshtein PA, Namazova-Baranova LS, Vorobyeva PL. Pure-tone audiometry and ASSR to acoustic stimulation as predictors of speech intelligibility in ci-users. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2026;91(2):12‑18. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/otorino20269102112

Recommended articles:
Correlation between endo­thelial dysfunction and sensorineural hearing loss. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(3):13-18
Intralabyrinthine schwannoma masking as Meniere’s disease. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(3):67-72
The effe­ctiveness of adequate correction of audi­tory function on cognitive function. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(4):105-111
Hearing impairment in children with cystic fibrosis. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2026;(1):41-49
Elevated ABR thre­sholds in the presence of otoacoustic emissions: case series. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2026;(1):76-85

References:

  1. Killan CF, Killan EC, Raine CH. Changes in children’s speech discrimination and spatial release from masking between 2 and 4 years after sequential cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International. 2015;16(5):270-276.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1754762815Y.0000000001
  2. Ching TY, Zhang VW, Flynn C, Burns L, Button L, Hou S, McGhie K, Van Buynder P. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology. 2018;57(sup2):S70-S80.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2017.1346307
  3. Nicastri M, Dincer D’Alessandro H, Baccolini V, Migliara G, Sciurti A, De Vito C, Ranucci L, Giallini I, Greco A, Mancini P. Executive functions in preschool and school-age cochlear implant users: do they differ from their hearing peers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2024;281(2):579-600.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08260-x
  4. Kaandorp MW, Smits C, Merkus P, Festen JM, Goverts ST. Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Trends in Hearing. 2017;21:2331216517743887. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517743887
  5. Hey M, Hocke T, Ambrosch P. Speech audiometry and data logging in CI patients: Implications for adequate test levels. HNO. 2018;66 (Suppl 1):22-27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-017-0419-8
  6. Boboshko MYu, Savenko IV, Garbaruk ES, Zhuravskij SG, Mal`ceva NV, Berdnikova IP. Prakticheskaya surdologiya. SPb.: Dialog; 2021. (In Russ.).
  7. Dziemba OC, Oberhoffner T, Müller A. [OLSA level control in monaural speech audiometry in background noise for the evaluation of the CI fitting result]. HNO. 2023;71(2):100-105.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-022-01251-0
  8. Watts NR, Montes ML. Adult Cochlear Implant Programming: A Basic Introduction. Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Hearing Devices. Second edition. Plural Publishing; 2020.
  9. Ordoñez Luna AC, Lazarte Villarroel IT. Rehabilitación auditiva posterior a un implante coclear métodos tradicionales y método novedoso. Revista Científica de Salud UNITEPC. 2020;7(2):20-33.  https://doi.org/10.36716/unitepc.v7i2.71
  10. Costa LBAD, Vicente LC, Silva LTDN, Alvarenga KF, Salgado MH, Costa OA, Brito R. Analysis of aided thresholds in children who have undergone cochlear reimplantation: a ten-year follow-up. CoDAS. 2023;35(6):e20210293. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232021293ende
  11. de Graaff F, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Kaandorp MW, Merkus P, Goverts ST, Kramer SE, Smits C. Relationship Between Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise and Fitting Parameters, Impedances and ECAP Thresholds in Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Ear and Hearing. 2019;41(4):935-947.  https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000814
  12. Koroleva IV, Pudov VI, Kliachko DS, Levin SV, Levina EA, Kuzovkov VE, Zontova OV. Nastrojka protsessora kokhlearnogo implanta u osobykh grupp patsientov. Pod red. IV Korolevoj. SPb.: Poliforum Grupp; 2019. (In Russ.).
  13. Gojxburg MV. The results of rehabilitation after cochlear implantation. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2013;(Prilozhenie 5):219-220. (In Russ.).
  14. Spivak LG, Chute PM. The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear and Hearing. 1994;15(2):184-192.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199404000-00008
  15. Klyachko DS, Pashkov AV, Gadaleva SV, Naumova IV. The electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve. Literature review. Rossijskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2018;95(4):99-120. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18692/1810-4800-2018-4-99-120
  16. Pashkov AV. Frequency-specific assessment of hearing function based on data from recording the auditory response to a constant modulated tone. Rossiiskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2004;2(9):86-88. (In Russ.).
  17. Naumova IV, Gadaleva SV, Pashkov AV. Auditory steadystate responses. Literature review. Rossiiskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2018;3(94):115-129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18692/1810-4800-2018-3-115-129
  18. Pashkov AV, Naumova IV, Zelenkova IV, Rusetsky YuYu, Voevodina KI. Registration of stationary auditory potentials in patients with cochlear implants. Kremlevskaya meditsina. Klinicheskij vestnik. 2021;2:24-28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26269/vnae-yd85
  19. Pashkov AV, Naumova IV, Voevodina KI, Pashkova AE, Popadyuk VI, Ustinova NV, Mamedyarov AM. Psychophysical and electrophysiological parameters of the auditory analyzer as indicators of the effectiveness of cochlear implantation in children with bilateral deafness. Vestnik RAMN. 2023;78(5):400-407. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn10922
  20. Van Eijl RH, Buitenhuis PJ, Stegeman I, Klis SF, Grolman W. Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(2):476-487.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26154
  21. Schrank L, Nachtigäller P, Müller J, Hempel JM, Canis M, Spiegel JL, Rader T. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2024;281(7):3461-3473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08444-5
  22. Videhult Pierre P, Eklöf M, Smeds H, Asp F. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology. 2019;24(6):299-308.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000504592
  23. Rüegg U, Dalbert A, Veraguth D, Röösli C, Huber A, Pfiffner F. Correlation between Speech Perception Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation and Postoperative Acoustic and Electric Hearing Thresholds. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021;10(2):324.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020324
  24. Pashkov AV, Naumova IV, Pashkova AE, Voevodina KI, Popadyuk VI. Relationship between speech intelligibility, maximumcomfort levels, and evoked compound action potentialthresholds in patients with cochlear implants. Head and Neck. Golova i sheya. Rossijskij zhurnal. 2024;12(2):80-85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25792/hn.2024.12.2.80-85
  25. Supin AYa. Acute Hearing: What is It? Indicators of Frequency Resolving Power of Hearing. Rossijskij fiziologicheskij zhurnal im. I.M. Sechenova. 2020;106(4):436-447. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869813920040093
  26. Jeon EK, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Henry BA, Gantz BJ. Cochlear implant users’ spectral ripple resolution. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2015;138(4):2350-2358. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4932020
  27. Marinelli JP, Reed NS, Lohse CM, Fussell WL, Petersen RC, Machulda MM, Vassilaki M, Carlson ML. Cognitive Performance, Sociodemographic Factors, Pure-Tone Audiometry, and their Association with Speech Discrimination: A Prospective Population-Based Study of 1,061 Older Adults. Otology and Neurotology. 2023;44(9):860-865.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004003

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.