The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Yusef Yu.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Antonov A.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Makarova A.S.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Ovsepyan S.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Mozharovskaya M.V.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Modern devices for microinvasive glaucoma surgery

Authors:

Yusef Yu., Antonov A.A., Makarova A.S., Ovsepyan S.A., Mozharovskaya M.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;141(5): 101‑108

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2025141051101

Read: 354 times

Buy for 300₽
Contact the author
Table of contents

MODERN DEVICES FOR MICROINVASIVE GLAUCOMA SURGERY
MODERN DEVICES FOR MICROINVASIVE GLAUCOMA SURGERY

To cite this article:

Yusef Yu, Antonov AA, Makarova AS, Ovsepyan SA, Mozharovskaya MV. Modern devices for microinvasive glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;141(5):101‑108. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2025141051101

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Recommended articles:
Long-term outcomes of phakic intraocular lens implantation in high myopia. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):28-31
The resu­lts of fistulizing glaucoma surgeries in pseudophackic patients. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):45-52
Ciliochoroidal deta­chment as a complication of glaucoma surgery. Part 1. Theories of pathogenesis, symptoms and diagnosis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(3):79-84
Ciliochoroidal deta­chment as a complication of glaucoma surgery. Part 2. Treatment and prevention. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(3):85-91
The possibilities of antioxidant neuroretinoprotection in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(4):49-59
Electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis and moni­toring of glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(4):102-109
The effect of initial conservative hypo­tensive therapy on the outcomes of sele­ctive laser trabeculoplasty in primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(5):16-22
Surgical treatment of a patient with pancreatic trauma AAST grade IV. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(3):164-168
Abstract:

The main controllable factor in glaucoma is intraocular pressure, which is stabilized by medication, laser and surgical treatment methods. Over the past 20 years, advancements in surgical techniques for antihypertensive interventions have led to the emergence of a new class of procedures called microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). This review focuses on Russian and foreign microinvasive drainage devices that are currently the most widely used. For a large number of glaucoma patients, when traditional treatment methods are not effective and safe enough, MIGS using modern shunts is often the only way to stabilize intraocular pressure.

Keywords:

glaucoma
glaucoma surgery
intraocular pressure
microinvasive glaucoma surgery
drainage

Authors:

Yusef Yu.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Antonov A.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Makarova A.S.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Ovsepyan S.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Mozharovskaya M.V.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Received:

10.02.2025

Accepted:

09.04.2025

Close metadata

References:

  1. Egorov EA, Kuroedov AV, eds. Primary open-angle glaucoma. National leadership. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2023. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33029/9704-7661-1-LFP-2023-1-1032
  2. Erichev VP, Ermolaev AP, Antonov AA, Grigoryan GL, Kosova DV. New visual field testing possibilities (a preliminary report). Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2018;134(2):66-72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2018134266-72
  3. Lee RMH, Bouremel Y, Eames I, Brocchini S, Khaw PT. The Implications of an Ab Interno Versus Ab Externo Surgical Approach on Outflow Resistance of a Subconjunctival Drainage Device for Intraocular Pressure Control. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 2019;8:58.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12660
  4. Erichev VP, Antonov AA, Vitkov AA, Grigoryan LA. Static automated perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Part 2: Research protocol, glaucoma classifications, perimetric defects through the prism of structural-functional correlation. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(5-2):289-299. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2021137052289
  5. Goel M, Picciani RG, Lee RK, Bhattacharya SK. Aqueous humor dynamics: a review. Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2010;4:52-59.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101004010052
  6. Nesterov AP. Glaukoma. M.: Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo; 2008. (In Russ.).
  7. Eliseeva NV, Churnosov MI. Etiopathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(3):79-86. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202013603179
  8. Antonov AA, Vitkov AA, Agadzhanyan TM. The efficacy and safety of the domestic travoprost generic in various modes of therapy for primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal Glaucoma. 2021;20(4):50-56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2021-20-4-50-56
  9. Conlon R, Saheb H, Ahmed IIK. Glaucoma treatment trends: a review. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017;52:114-124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.07.013
  10. Mamikonian VR, Fisenko NV. Glaucoma surgery: from traditional filtration techniques to modern principles of bioengineering. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2018;134(5):111-117. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2018134051111
  11. Gedde SJ, Parrish RK, Budenz DL, Heuer DK. Update on aqueous shunts. Experimental Eye Research. 2011;93:284-290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2011.03.013
  12. Suleiman EA, Petrov SYu. Drainage glaucoma surgery. National Journal Glaucoma. 2022;21(2):67-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-2-67-76
  13. Lee RMH, Bouremel Y, Eames I, Brocchini S, Khaw PT. Translating minimally invasive glaucoma surgery devices. Clinical and Translational Science. 2020;13:14-25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12660
  14. Khalilova TA, Zaitseva AA, Koveshnikov AI. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2023;139(5):90-95. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202313905190
  15. Ivanova NV, Savchenko AV. Method of preventing late hemorrhagic complications after surgical treatment of secondary neovascular glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(2):12-15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913502112
  16. Erichev VP, Abdullaeva EH, Mazurova UV. Frequency and nature of intraoperative and early postoperative complications after glaucoma surgeries. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(1):54-59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202113701154
  17. Basinsky AS, Garkavenko VV, Karimov UR, Isakov IN, Zakhidov AB, Dovgileva OM, Yuldashev AM, Kuroedov AV, Seleznev AV, Brezhnev AYu. Drainage surgery of primary open-angle glaucoma: past, present, future. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2021;2:79-85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2021-2-79-85
  18. Sousa DC, Pinto LA. Trabeculectomy — prevention and management of complications. European Ophthalmic Review. 2018;12:98-101.  https://doi.org/10.17925/EOR.2018.12.2.98
  19. Koh V, Chew P, Triolo G, Lim KS, Barton K. Treatment outcomes using the PAUL glaucoma implant to control intraocular pressure in eyes with refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 2020;3:350-359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2020.05.001
  20. Chan JE, Netland PA. EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device: efficacy, safety, and predictability. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. 2015;8:381-388.  https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S63350
  21. Asratyan G.K. Development of a differentiated approach to drainage surgery of primary open-angle glaucoma: Diss. ... Candidate of Medical Sciences. M. 2015. (In Russ.).
  22. Shaarawy TM, Moschos MM, Sherwood MB. New glaucoma surgical alternatives. Glaucoma. 2nd ed. London, England, UK: Elsevier/Saunders; 2015.
  23. Schehlein EM, Kaleem MA, Swamy R, Saeedi OJ. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: an evidence-based assessment. Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2017;12:331-343.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2017.1335597
  24. Glaukos. Glaukos — iStent inject® W. 2021. https://www.glaukos.com/en-uk/healthcare-professionals/istent-inject-w
  25. Samet S, Ong JA, Ahmed IIK. Hydrus microstent implantation for surgical management of glaucoma: a review of design, efficacy and safety. Eye and Vision. 2019;6:32.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0157-y
  26. Chen DZ, Sng CCA. Safety and efficacy of microinvasive glaucoma surgery. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017;2017:3182935. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3182935
  27. Ahmed IIK, Fea A, Au L, Ang RE, Harasymowycz P, Jampel HD, Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Rhee DJ; COMPARE Investigators. A prospective randomized trial comparing Hydrus and iStent microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants for standalone treatment of open-angle glaucoma: the COMPARE study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:52-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.034
  28. Kumar V, Frolov MA, Dushina GN, Shradqa AS, Bezzabotnov AI. Reverse meridional cyclodialysis ab interno with implantation of a metallic implant in patients with glaucoma of different etiology (in Russian only). Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(3):10-19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913503110
  29. Caretti L, Buratto L. Glaucoma surgery: Treatment and Techniques. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
  30. García-Feijoo J, Rau M, Grisanti S, Grisanti S, Höh H, Erb C, Guguchkova P, Ahmed I, Grabner G, Reitsamer H, Shaarawy T, Ianchulev T. Supraciliary micro-stent implantation for open-angle glaucoma failing topical therapy: 1-year results of a multicenter study. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;159:1075-1081.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.02.018
  31. Shah M. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery — an interventional glaucoma revolution. Eye and Vision. 2019;6:29.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0154-1
  32. Figus M, Posarelli C, Passani A, Albert TG, Oddone F, Sframeli AT, Nardi M. The supraciliary space as a suitable pathway for glaucoma surgery: Ho-hum or home run? Survey of Ophthalmology. 2017;62:828-837.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.05.002
  33. Fili S, Wölfelschneider P, Kohlhaas M. The STARflo glaucoma implant: preliminary 12 months results. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2018;256:773-781.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3916-x
  34. Denis P, Hirneiß C, Reddy KP, Kamarthy A, Calvo E, Hussain Z, Ahmed IIK. A first-in-human study of the efficacy and safety of MINIject in patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (STAR-I). Ophthalmology Glaucoma. 2019;2:290-297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2019.06.001
  35. Fernández-García A, Zhou Y, García-Alonso M, Andrango HD, Poyales F, Garzón N. Medium-term clinical outcomes following Xen45 device implantation. International Ophthalmology. 2020;40:709-715.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01232-3
  36. Petrov SIu, Volzhanin AV. XEN-45 Gel Stent implant in glaucoma treatment. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2018;134(5):244-249. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2018134051244
  37. Sadruddin O, Pinchuk L, Angeles R, Palmberg P. Ab externo implantation of the MicroShunt, a poly (styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) surgical device for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: a review. Eye and Vision. 2019;6:36.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0162-1
  38. Batlle JF, Corona A, Albuquerque R. Long-term results of the PRESERFLO® microshunt in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma from a single-center non-randomized study. Journal of Glaucoma. 2020;30:281-286.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001734
  39. Wolters JEJ, van Mechelen RJS, Al Majidi R, Pinchuk L, Webers CAB, Beckers HJM, Gorgels TGMF. History, presence and future of mitomycin C in glaucoma filtration surgery. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2021;32: 148-159.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000729
  40. RF patent for invention No.2775705/06.07.2022 Bull. No.19. Yusef NYu. Device, kit and method for minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. (In Russ.). Accessed March 07, 2024. https://www.fips.ru/cdfi/fips.dll/ru?ty=29&docid=2775705
  41. Recieved 10.02.2025 
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.