The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Avetisov K.S.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN

Yusef Yu.N.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Smirnova T.V.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Sakalova E.D.

Research Institute of Eye Disease, 11 A,B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russia, 119021

Avetisov S.E.

FGBU "Nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ institut glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Morphological and functional condition of the macula after different types of phaco cataract surgeries

Authors:

Avetisov K.S., Yusef Yu.N., Smirnova T.V., Sakalova E.D., Avetisov S.E.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(1): 4‑16

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma20201360114

Read: 1976 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CONDITION OF THE MACULA AFTER DIFFERENT TYPES OF PHACO CATARACT SURGERIES
MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL CONDITION OF THE MACULA AFTER DIFFERENT TYPES OF PHACO CATARACT SURGERIES

To cite this article:

Avetisov KS, Yusef YuN, Smirnova TV, Sakalova ED, Avetisov SE. Morphological and functional condition of the macula after different types of phaco cataract surgeries. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(1):4‑16. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma20201360114

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Obje­ctive stru­ctural and functional moni­toring of poly­peptide reti­nal neuroprotective therapy in diabetic reti­nopathy. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):97-104
Non-invasive auto­mated methods for the diagnosis of periorbital skin tumors. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):137-145
Effi­cacy of brolucizumab in the treatment of reti­nal pathologies: a review of post-marketing studies. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):154-161
Pathogenetic aspe­cts of diffuse lame­llar kera­titis after laser corneal refractive surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(6):131-137
Cyto­megalovirus chorioretinitis in human immu­nodeficiency virus (case study). Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):62-68
The role of the stru­cture of the lamina cribrosa in the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma. Stru­ctural and circulatory changes in the lamina cribrosa with aging and elevated intraocular pressure. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):76-82
Choroidal neovascularization asso­ciated with choroidal nevi. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):104-112
Morphometric analysis of small reti­noblastomas following combination chemotherapy. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(2):38-43
Diagnostic capa­bilities of opti­cal cohe­rence tomo­graphy in obstruction of the upper lacrimal pathway. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(3):37-47
Intravascular physiology and imaging in dete­rmining the indi­cations for reva­scularization in patients with inte­rmediate coro­nary stenosis. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):255-260
Abstract:

One of the directions of advancing phaco technology is related to adoption of hybrid phacoemulsification for clinical practice. Potential postsurgical changes in the macular area, when other factors are equal, can be seen as a conditional criterion for the injury rate of phaco surgeries. Purpose – to evaluate morphological and functional condition of the macular area after different types of phaco cataract surgeries. Material and methods. Two groups were formed for comparative study in accordance with criteria for standardization and maximum mitigation of the impact of other factors on the condition of the retina – with standard ultrasound and hybrid (femtolaser-assisted) phacoemulsification (30 operations in each group). Examinations were performed initially, then 7–10 days, and 2–3 month after the surgery. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) were performed for evaluation of the morphological and functional condition of the macular area. Results. There was no statistically significant dependence of linear and volumetric measures in the macular area on phaco surgery method, and the few variations were most likely related to increasing the time of ultrasound action in standard phacoemulsification. Revealed changes turned out to be significantly less marked than what is considered critical for development of macular edema. Improvement of baseline multifocal electroretinography measurements (increase of the density of retinal biopotential and decrease of latent time) just after the surgery results from the effect the lens opacification has on basic parameters, regardless of phacoemulsification technique. There were no significant differences in postsurgical measurements of multifocal electroretinography obtained in similar periods of postsurgical assessment after standard ultrasound and hybrid phacoemulsification. Conclusion. The results prove the safety of phaco surgery methods and the absence of negative impact of femtolaser component of hybrid phacoemulsification on structural and functional condition of central retina.

Keywords:

macular area
phaco surgery
optical coherence tomography
multifunctional electroretinography

Authors:

Avetisov K.S.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN

Yusef Yu.N.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Smirnova T.V.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Sakalova E.D.

Research Institute of Eye Disease, 11 A,B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russia, 119021

Avetisov S.E.

FGBU "Nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ institut glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Close metadata

References:

  1. Malyugin BE. State-of-the-art cataract surgery and intraocular optical correction. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2014; 130(6): 80–88. (In Russ.).
  2. Avetisov SE, Mamikonyan VR, Yusef YuN, Yusef SN, Ivanov MN, Avetisov KS. Hybrid phacoemulsification: a new stage in the improvement of cataract surgery. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2014; 130(2):4–8. (In Russ.).
  3. Teplovodskaya VV, Husanbaev HSh, Morina NA, Sudakova EP. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2019; 135 (3):128–136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2019135031128
  4. Gass JD. Fluorescein studies of patients with macular edema and papilledema following cataract surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1966; 64:232–239.
  5. Irvine AR. Cystoid maculopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1976; 21(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(76)90045-x
  6. Flach AJ. The incidence, pathogenesis and treatment cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery. Trans Am Opthalmol Soc. 1998; 96: 557–664.
  7. Henderson BA, Kim JY, Ament CS, Ferrufino-Ponce ZK, Grabowska A, Cremers SL. Clinical pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Risk factors for development and duration after treatment. Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33 (9): 1550–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.013
  8. Rossetti L, Autelitano A. Cystoid macular edema following cataract surgery. Opin Ophthalmol. 2000; 11:65–72.
  9. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcap SM, Nussenblatt RB. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: relationship to blood-aqueous barrier damage and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25(6):1492–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00196-0
  10. Von Jagow B, Ohrloff C, Kohnen T. Macular thickness after uneventful cataract surgery determined by optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007; 245 (12): 1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0605-6
  11. Bergman M, Laatikainen L. Cystoid macular edema after complicated cataract surgery and implantation of an anterior chamber lens. Acta Opthalmol. 1994; 72:178–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb05013.x
  12. Falcao M, Goncalves N, Freitas-Costa P, Beato JB, Rocha-Sousa A, Carneiro A, Brandao EM, Falcao-Reis FM. Chorioidal and macular thikness changes induced by cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014; 8:55–60. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S53989
  13. Miyake K, Ibaraki N. Prostoglandins and cystoid macular edema. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002; 47 (Suppl 1):203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00294-1
  14. Biro Z, Balla Z, Kovacs B. Change of foveal and perifoveal thickness measured by OCT after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Eye. 2008; 22(1): 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702460
  15. Ghosh S, Roy I, Biscwas PN, Maji D, Mondal LK, Mukhopadhyay S, Bhaduri G. Prospective randomized comparative study of macular thickness following phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010; 88(4):102–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01896.x
  16. Mentes J, Erakgun T, Afrashi F, Kerci G. Incidence of cystoid macular edema after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Ophthalmologica. 2003; 217 (6): 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1159/000073070
  17. Shpak AA. Opticheskaja kogerentnaja tomografija: problemy i reshenija. M.: Oftal’mologija; 2019. (In Russ.).
  18. Ching HY, Wong AC, Wong CC, Woo DC, Chan CW. Cystoid macular edema and changes in retinal thickness after phacoemulsification with optical coherence tomography. Eye. 2006; 20 (3): 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701864
  19. Cabrera Fernandes D, Salinas HM, Puliafito CA. Automated detection of retinal layer structures on optical coherence tomography images. Opt Express. 2005; 13: 10200–10216. https://doi.org/10.1364/opex.13.010200
  20. Hee M, Puliafito CA, Wong C, Duker JS, Reichel E, Rutledge B, Schuman JS, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Quantitative assessment of macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Arch ophthalmol. 1995; 113: 1019–1029. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100080071031
  21. Hee M, Izatt J, Swanson E, Huang D, Schuman JS, Lin CP, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113 (3): 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100030081025
  22. Huang D, Swanson E, Lin C, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991; 254: 1178–1181. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1957169
  23. Nussenblatt RB, Kaufman SC, Palestine AG, et al. Macular thickness and visual acuity. Measurement in patients with cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1987; 94: 1134–1139.
  24. Lederer D, Schuman J, Hertzmark E, Heltzer J, Velazques LJ, Fujimoto JG, Mattox C. Analysis of macular volume in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135 (6): 838–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02277-8
  25. Shamshinova AM, Volkov VV. Funktsionalnye metody issledovaniya v oftalmologii. M.: Meditsina; 2014. (In Russ.).
  26. Shamshinova AM. Elektroretinografiya v oftalmologii. M.: Medika; 2009. (In Russ.).
  27. Wordehoff UV, Palmowski AM, Heinemann-Vernaleken B, Allgayer R, Ruprecht KW. Influence of cataract on the multifocal ERG recording – a pre- and postoperative comparison. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004; 108 (1): 67–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DOOP.0000018394.84831.40
  28. Palmowski-Wolfe AM, Wordehoff UV. A comparison of the fast stimulation multifocal-ERG in patients with an IOL and control groups of different age. Ophthalmol. 2005; 111 (2): 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-005-4506-x
  29. Palmowski AM, Sutter EE, Bearse MA, Fung W. Multifocal electroretinogram (MF-ERG) in diagnosis of macular changes. Example: senile macular degeneration. Ophthalmologe. 1999; 96 (3):166–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003470050389
  30. Tam VK, Chan H, Brown B, Yap M. Effects of different degrees of cataract on the multifocal electroretinogram. Eye (Lond). 2004; 18 (7): 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701318
  31. Tam WK, Chan H, Brown B, Leung KW, Woo V, Yap M. Comparing the multifocal electroretinogram topography before and after cataract surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2005; 30 (7): 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680590968565
  32. Mendoza-Santiesteban CE, Fernandes-Cherkasova L, Echavarria OH, et al. Multifocal electroretinography. Semin Ophthalmol. 2010; 25 (4): 155–164. https://doi.org/10/3109/08820538.2010.500210
  33. Hedges TR, Quireza ML. Multifocal visual evoked potential, multifocalelectroretinography, and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical loss of vision. Opthalmol Clin North Am. 2004; 17(1): 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-1549(03)00104-4
  34. Yavas GF, Kusbeci T, Inan UU. Multifocal electroretinography in subjects with age-related macular degeneration. Doc Opthalmol. 2014; (3): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-014-9460-z
  35. Sheludchenko VM, Ronzina IA, Galoyan NS. A case of bilateral cystoid macular edema (Irvine-Gass) after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2015; 131(1):82–89. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2015131182-89
  36. Avetisov KS. Acoustic density of cataracts. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2015; 131(2):38–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2015131238-44
  37. Ewe S, Oakley C, Abell R, Allen PL, Vote BJ. Cystoid macular edema after femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery. J.Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(12): 2373–2378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.031
  38. Levitz L, Reich J, Roberts T, Lawless M. Incidence of cystoid macular edema: femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus manual cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(3):683–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.11.039
  39. Ecsedy M, Mihaltz K, Kovacs I, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Nagy ZZ. Effect of femtosecond laser cataract surgery on the macula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37 (10):717–722.  https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20110825-01
  40. Nagy ZZ, Ecsedy M, Kovacs I, Takacs A, Tatrai E, Somfai GM, Cabrera DBD. Macular morphology assessed by optical coherence tomography image segmentation after femtosecond laser-assisted and standard cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38 (6): 941–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.02.031
  41. Verdina T, Date P, Benatti C, Lazzerini A, Fornasari E, De Maria M, Pellacani E, Forlini M, Cavallini GM. Evaluation of macular pigment optical density following femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 6 (13):821–828. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S196061
  42. Renones de Abajo J, Estevez Jorge B, Gonzalez Martín J, Carreras Diaz H, Loro Ferrer JF, Anton Lopez A. Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery on the optic nerve head and the macula. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019; 12(6): 961–966. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.06.13
  43. Enz TJ, Faes L, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA, Howell JP, Boehni SC, Bittner M, Schmid MK. Comparison of macular parameters after femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgery in age-related macular degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018; 44 (1):23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.09.030
  44. Wang Y, Du J, Yang M, Xu Y, Guan H, Wu J. Distinct macular thickness changes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery of age-related cataract and myopia with cataract. Sci Rep. 2018; 19(8):3279–3283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21698-y
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.