The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Osipian G.A.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Sheludchenko V.M.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Khraystin Kh.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

Modern methods of surgical treatment of keratectasias

Authors:

Osipian G.A., Sheludchenko V.M., Khraystin Kh.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(2): 138‑143

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2019135021138

Read: 897 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

MODERN METHODS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF KERATECTASIAS
MODERN METHODS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF KERATECTASIAS

To cite this article:

Osipian GA, Sheludchenko VM, Khraystin Kh. Modern methods of surgical treatment of keratectasias. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(2):138‑143. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2019135021138

Подписка 2025-2 (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Mediasphera_Net
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Comparative asse­ssment of the state of the cornea after YAG-laser inte­rventions on ante­rior segment stru­ctures. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):17-25
Puru­lent scle­ritis following pene­trating kera­toplasty for acanthamoeba kera­titis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):74-79
Options for contact correction after kera­toplasty. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):98-103
Biomechanical control of myopia: pote­ntial of bidi­rectional corneal applanation with high-speed video reco­rding. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):25-32
Clinical outcomes of SMILE Xtra for myopia correction. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):87-96
Aberrometry in the diagnosis and treatment of kera­toconus. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):162-168
Combined approach to cata­ract surgery in kera­toconus. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(6):107-111

Keratectasia (KE) ranks as one of the main causes of impaired vision. The pathology is characterized by progressive thinning of the cornea, which causes its deformation, the appearance of irregular astigmatism, and the reduction of vision acuity. The article reviews modern surgical methods that can be used to prevent the progression and treat various types of KE.

Keywords:

cornea
keratoconus
pellucid marginal corneal degeneration
penetrating keratoplasty
bandage therapeutic-optical keratoplasty
corneal collagen cross-linking

Authors:

Osipian G.A.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Sheludchenko V.M.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Khraystin Kh.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A, B, Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021

List of references:

  1. Leccisotti A, Aslanides IM, Keratoconus and Keratoectasia: Advancements in Diagnosis and Treatment. J Ophthalmol. 2012;29(2). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/526058
  2. Pron G, Ieraci L. Collagen cross-linking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-a for corneal thinning disorders: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2011;11(5):1-89.
  3. Balparda K, Maldonado MJ. Corneal collagen cross-linking. A review of its clinical applications. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2017;92(4):166-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2016.10.003
  4. Hassan Z, Nemeth G. Collagen cross-linking in the treatment of pellucid marginal degeneration. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(3):367-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.109523
  5. Mackool RJ. Crosslinking for iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK and for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.02.027
  6. Koller T, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(8):1358-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.03.035
  7. Kasparova EA, Kurenkov VV. Combination of photorefractive and phototherapeutic keratoectomy in the treatment of keratoconus. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2000;116(4):10-12. (In Russ.)
  8. Sitnik GV, Slonimsky AYu, Slonimsky YuB, Imshenetskaya TA. Femtolaser refractive autokeratoplasty — a new way of surgical treatment of keratoconus. Tochka zrenia. Vostok—Zapad. 2016;1:42-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2016.62012
  9. Panda A, Gupta AK, Sharma N. Anatomical and functional graft survival, 10 years after epikeratoplasty in keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(1):18-22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.105049
  10. Bikbova GM. Epikeratoplasty using the frozen donor cornea in the treatment of keratoconus: Dis... kand. med. nauk. M. 2008. (In Russ.)
  11. Blavatskaya ED. Aplication of intralamellar homoplasties for the purpose of cancellation of ocular refraction. Oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. 1966;7:530-537. (In Russ.)
  12. Beliaev VS, Kravchinina VV, Dushin NV. Interlamellar keratoplasty (current state and prospects). Oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. 1983;2:94-98. (In Russ.)
  13. Beliaev VS, Dushin NV, Kravchinina VV, Barashkov VI, Gonchar PA, Frolov MA. Interlamellar sectoral keratoplasty in the surgical correction of astigmatism. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1996;112(2):15-18. (In Russ.)
  14. Alio JL, Shabayek MH, Artola A. Intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus correction: longterm follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(6):978-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.044
  15. Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL, Brenner LF, Javaloy J, Plaza Puche AB. Outcome analysis of intracorneal ring segments for the treatment of keratoconus based on visual, refractive, and aberrometric impairment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(3):575-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.020
  16. Giacomin NT, Mello GR, Medeiros CS, Kiliç A, Serpe CC, Almeida HG, Kara-Junior N, Santhiago MR. Intracorneal Ring Segments Implantation for Corneal Ectasia. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):829-839. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20160822-01
  17. Daxer A. MyoRing for central and noncentral keratoconus. International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2012;1:117-119.
  18. El-Husseiny M, Daas L, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Intracorneal Ring Segments to Treat Keratectasia — Interim Results and Potential Complications. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016;233(6):722-726. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-108653
  19. Torquetti L, Berbel RF, Ferrara P. Long-term follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(10):1768-1773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.036
  20. Kalinnikov YuYu, Ioshin IE, Grigoryan AR, Bezzabotnov AI. Femtolazernaya keratoplastika s ispol’zovaniyem kol’tsevidnogo rogovichnogo implantata 359° v prostranstve keratokonusa. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2017;9(1):15-18. (In Russ.)
  21. Barbara A, Shehadeh-Masha’our R, Zvi F, Garzozi HJ. Management of pellucid marginal degeneration with intracorneal ring segments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;21:296-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.034
  22. Mojaled Nobari S, Villena C, Jadidi K. Full-Ring Intracorneal Implantation in Corneas With Pellucid Marginal Degeneration. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(12):274-289. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.28974
  23. Lovisolo CF, Fleming JF. Intracorneal ring segments for iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2002;18(5):535. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00825-2
  24. Nicula C, Pop RN, Nicula DV. Comparative Results in a Combined Procedure of Intrastromal Corneal Rings Implantation and Cross-linking in Patients with Keratoconus: A Retrospective Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2017;6(2):313-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-017-0112-8
  25. Rabinowitz YS, Li X, Ignacio TS, et al. Intacs incerts using the femtosecond laser compared spreader in treatment of keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(8):764-771. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-200604630-00009
  26. Pinero DP, Alio JL, El Kady B, Coskunseven E, et al. Refractive and aberrometric outcomes of intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus: mechanical versus femtosecond-assisted procedures. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1675-1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.016
  27. Chan K, Hersh PS. Removal and Repositioning of Intracorneal Ring Segments: Improving Corneal Topography and Clinical Outcomes in Keratoconus and Ectasia. Cornea. 2017;36(2):244-248. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001075
  28. Torquetti L, Ferrara P. Reasons for intrastromal corneal ring segment explantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(11):2014-2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.025
  29. Chaudhry IA, Al-Ghamdi AA. Bilateral infectious keratitis after implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments. Cornea. 2010;29(3):339-341. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3181a87b35
  30. Kugler LJ, Hill S, Sztipanovits D. Corneal melt of incisions overlying corneal ring segments: case series and literature review. Cornea. 2011;30(9):968-971. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3182031ca0
  31. Coskunseven E, Kymionis GD, Tsiklis NS, Atun S, et al. Complications of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation using a femtosecond laser for channel creation: a survey of 850 eyes with keratoconus. Acta ophthalmologica. 2011;89(1):54-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01605.x
  32. Dushin NV, Belyaev VS, Gonchar PA, Frolov MA. Clinical possibilities of interlayer keratoplasty. Klinicheskaya oftalmologiya. 2000;1(3):72-77. (In Russ.)
  33. Mamikonyan VR, Avetisov SE, Osipyan GA. Interlamellar bandage keratoplasty for the treatment of progressive keratoconus (preliminary report). Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2015;1:18-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2015131118-23
  34. Jabbarvand M, Hashemian H. Intrastromal lamellar keratoplasty in patients with pellucid marginal degeneration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(1):2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.11.030
  35. Mastropasqua L, Nubile M. Femtosecond Laser — Assisted Stromal Lenticule Addition Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Advanced Keratoconus: A Preliminary Study Niccolò Salgari. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(1):36-44. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20171004-04
  36. Jacob S, Patel SR. Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (CAIRS) Combined With Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(5):296-303. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20180223-01
  37. Sharma B, Dubey A. Bowman’s layer transplantation: evidence to date. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12(5):433-437. https://https://doi.org/ 10.2147/OPTH.S141127
  38. Getadaryan VR, Oganesyan OG. Crossing of the Bowman membrane with subsequent transplantation (preliminary communication). Sovremennii tekhnologii v ophthalmologii. 2018;(4):57-59. (In Russ.)
  39. Slonimsky AYu, Slonimsky YuB, Jafarli TB, Vdovina GA. Refractive status and its dynamics after a through corneal transplant. Analysis of long-term observations. Proceedings of the IV Russian Symposium on Refractive and Plastic Eye Surgery. 2002;27-29. (In Russ.)
  40. Salvetat ML, Brusini P. Higher order aberrations after keratoplasty for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(3):293-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e318281980f
  41. Skeens HM, Holland EJ. Large-diameter penetrating keratoplasty: indications and outcomes. Cornea. 2010;29(3):296-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e3181b6489e
  42. Moshirfar M, Edmonds JN, Behunin NL, Chistiansen SM. Current options in the management of pellucid marginal degeneration. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:474-485. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20140429-02
  43. Birnbaum F, Wiggermann A, Maier PC, Böhringer D, Reinhard T. Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(1):95-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2054-0
  44. Daniel MC, Böhringer D, Maier P, Eberwein P, Birnbaum F, Reinhard T. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Keratoplasty with Conventional Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2016;35(3):293-298. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000739
  45. Barraquer JI. Lamellar keratoplasty (special techniques). Ann Ophthalmol. 1972;4:437-469.
  46. Anwar M, Teichmann K. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellarkeratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:398-403.
  47. Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology. 2013;120(9):1778-1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.018
  48. Mamikonyan VR, Osipyan GA, Avetisov KS. A new modification of the operation of complete stromoplasty of the cornea. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2010;126(4):35-37. (In Russ.)
  49. Liu H, Chen Y, Wang P, et. al. Efficacy and safety of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty vs. penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):207-211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113332
  50. Seitz B, Cursiefen C. DALK and penetrating laser keratoplasty for advanced keratoconus. Ophthalmologe. 2013;110(9):839-848.
  51. Ardjomand N, Hau S, McAlister JC, et al. Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:228-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.043
  52. Al-Torbak AA. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for pellucid marginal degeneration. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2013;27(1):11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.04.001
  53. Mehta P, Rathi VM. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the management of iatrogenic keratectasia occurring after hexagonal keratotomy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(2):139-141. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.94058
  54. Khattak A, Nakhli FR. Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(3):985-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0548-9
  55. Theo S. The Significance of OCT in Performing DALK. Supplement to Cataract & Refractive Surgery. Today Europe. 2017;14-15.

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.