The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kalashnikov S.A.

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Konoplyannikov A.G.

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Nasledova D.A.

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Surgical delivery of the second twin: cesarean section or combined external – internal podalic version and breech extraction

Authors:

Kalashnikov S.A., Konoplyannikov A.G., Nasledova D.A.

More about the authors

Read: 136 times


To cite this article:

Kalashnikov SA, Konoplyannikov AG, Nasledova DA. Surgical delivery of the second twin: cesarean section or combined external – internal podalic version and breech extraction. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;25(5):60‑66. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20252505160

References:

  1. Kurtser MA, Sichinava LG, Shishkina DI, Latyshkevich OA, Breusenko LE, Spiridonov DS. Fetal growth restriction: current diagnostic criteria, management of pregnancy and labor. Voprosy ginekologii akusherstva i perinatologii. 2023;22:1:5-11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2023-1-5-11
  2. Cha W, Yun I, Nam CM, Nam JY, Park EC. Evaluation of assisted reproductive technology health insurance coverage for multiple pregnancies and virths in Korea. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6:6:e2316696. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16696
  3. European IVF Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE); Smeenk J, Wyns C, De Geyter C, Kupka M, Bergh C, Cuevas Saiz I, De Neubourg D, Rezabek K, Tandler-Schneider A, Rugescu I, Goossens V. ART in Europe, 2019: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:12:2321-2338. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead197
  4. Barnea ER, Inversetti A, Di Simone N; FIGO Childbirth and Postpartum Hemorrhage Committee. FIGO good practice recommendations for cesarean delivery: Prep-for-Labor triage to minimize risks and maximize favorable outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;163 Suppl 2:57-67.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15115
  5. Bevilacqua E, Torcia E, Meli F, Josse J, Bonanni G, Olivier C, Romanzi F, Carlin A, Familiari A, Jani JC, Lanzone A, Badr DA. Maternal and fetal outcomes after planned cesarean or vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy: a comparison between 2 third level birth centers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024;37:1:2350676. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2350676
  6. Gauthier S, Jeanneteau P, Legendre G, Boulvais E, Collin R, Malo L, Rolland D, Courtin O, Thubert T, Winer N, Dochez V. Vaginal delivery of the second twin: A simulation program for residents in obstetrics and gynecology in a type III university maternity hospital. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022;51:8:102434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102434
  7. Justman N, Goldfriend R, Rosh B, Wolfovitch A, Siegler Y, Tzur L, Bachar G, Buchnik G, Zipori Y, Khatib N, Weiner Z, Vitner D. Exploring the optimal intertwin delivery interval for vaginal delivery. Reprod Sci. 2024;31:6:1551-1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01497-9
  8. Schmitz T, Goffinet F. L’accouchement des femmes enceintes de jumeaux : les enseignements de l’étude nationale observationnelle prospective comparative JUMODA [Delivery of twins : lessons learnt from the national observational prospective comparative study JUMODA]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2024;52:6:410-417. (In French). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2023.11.005
  9. Felder L, McCurdy R, Berghella V. External cephalic version of the non-cephalic presenting twin: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:9:1712-1718. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1768237
  10. Mei JY, Muñoz HE, Kim JS, Szlachta-McGinn A, Blat C, Rao R, Han CS, Irani RA, Afshar Y. Rates of cesarean conversion and associated predictors and outcomes in planned vaginal twin deliveries. Am J Perinatol. 2022;39:6:601-608.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718368
  11. Rottenstreich M, Rotem R, Glick I, Reichman O, Rottenstreich A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Sela HY. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin deliveries with prolonged second-stage duration of the presenting twin: a Retrospective cohort study. Reprod Sci. 2022;29:1:143-153.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00798-7
  12. Kalashnikov SA. Parameters of neonate serum acid-base state and gas composition in multifetal pregnancy. Akusherstvo, ginekologia i reproduktsiya. 2020;14:6:612-621. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2020.175
  13. Clinical recommendations «Multiple pregnancy» dated 24.06.2021. https://disuria.ru/_ld/11/1181_kr21O30O31MZ.pdf?ysclid=m5xixmy86v904934178(InRuss.).
  14. Zidan R, Saad N, Siegler Y, Justman N, Mick I, Ben-Asher H, Beloosesky R, Ginsberg Y, Weiner Z, Zipori Y. The impact of prolonged second stage in twins on perinatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;157:2:347-352.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13787
  15. Aviram A, Barrett J, Mei-Dan E, Yoon EW, Melamed N. A prediction tool for mode of delivery in twin pregnancies-a secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;231:1:124.e1-124.e11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1230
  16. Justman NN, Goldfreind R, Abu-Rass H, Siegler Y, Shahak G, Wolfovitz A, Ginsberg Y, Zipori Y, Khatib N, Weiner Z, Vitner D. Risk factors for prolonged intertwin delivery interval and associated maternal and second twin morbidity. Am J Perinatol. 2024;41:(S 01):e2587-e2592. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772229
  17. Anur’ev AM, Gorbachev VI. Hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in premature newborns. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019;119:8 vyp. 2:63-69. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201911908263
  18. Loussert L, Laur J, Paret L, Parant O, Dupuis N, Guerby P. Factors associated with cesarean delivery of the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin: A case-control study. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2022;50:7-8:505-510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2022.03.003
  19. Mok SL, Lo TK. Vaginal delivery of second twins: factors predictive of failure and adverse perinatal outcomes. Hong Kong Med J. 2022;28:5:376-382.  https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj198038
  20. Yoles I, Sheiner E, Wainstock T. Long term respiratory morbidity of cesarean-delivered second twin compared to their vaginally-delivered sibling: A retrospective population-based cohort study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023;58:12:3542-3548. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.26688
  21. Frenken MWE, de Wit-Zuurendonk LD, Easter SR, Goossens SMTA, Oei SG. Simulation-based training of vaginal twin delivery for experienced gynaecologists: Useful or not? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;251:89-97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.020
  22. Arabin B, Kyvernitakis I, Hamza A, Maul H, Di Tommaso M, van Eyck J, Nizard J. Vaginal delivery of the second twin in unengaged cephalic presentation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34:1:112-116.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1590333
  23. Desseauve D, Daelemans C, Farin A, Jauvion IBM, Ceccaldi PF; Prise en charge des accouchements à risque eT des urgences maternelles PARTUM teaching program. Internal podalic version of second twin: Improving feet identification using a simulation model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;275:9-11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.036
  24. Mol BW, Bergenhenegouwen L, Ensing S, Ravelli AC, Kok M. The impact of mode of delivery on the outcome in very preterm twins. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33:12:2089-2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1540579

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.