The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Derzhavin V.A.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Bukharov A.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Yadrina A.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Erin D.A.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Elkhov D.O.

Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center

Results of invasive diagnosis of primary malignant bone tumors of the pelvis

Authors:

Derzhavin V.A., Bukharov A.V., Yadrina A.V., Erin D.A., Elkhov D.O.

More about the authors

Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;13(2): 9‑14

DOI: 10.17116/onkolog2024130219

Read: 1073 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

RESULTS OF INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY MALIGNANT BONE TUMORS OF THE PELVIS
RESULTS OF INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY MALIGNANT BONE TUMORS OF THE PELVIS

To cite this article:

Derzhavin VA, Bukharov AV, Yadrina AV, Erin DA, Elkhov DO. Results of invasive diagnosis of primary malignant bone tumors of the pelvis. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;13(2):9‑14. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog2024130219

Подписка 2026 Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена (P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Difficulties in life­time diagnosis of Creutzfeldt—Jakob disease. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11):19-27
Clinical case of auri­cular gouty tophi. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;(6):80-84
Dete­ction of mpox virus by enzyme immu­noassay in a no-instrumental format and after its inactivation with formaldehyde. Mole­cular Gene­tics, Microbiology and Viro­logy. 2024;(4):49-53
Labo­ratory diagnostics of monkeypox: basic methods and prospects for new deve­lopments. Labo­ratory Service. 2024;(4):57-64
Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome as a predictor of atrial fibrillation. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(1):109-114
Ultrastructural changes of skeletal muscle tissue of patients with dysferlinopathy. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2025;(1):28-36
Resu­lts of the All-Russian consensus conference on complications in bariatric surgery. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(1):15-24
X-ray endo­scopic classification of aspi­ration syndrome. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(1):31-37
Virus-associated progesterone-resistant chro­nic endo­metritis — the onco­risk situation?. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(1):25-30
Arti­ficial Inte­lligence in Dentistry: A Sign of the Times. Stomatology. 2025;(1):87-92
Abstract:

Performing invasive diagnosis in patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the pelvis is a challenging task due to the anatomical complexity of this area, deep-seated tumors in the acetabulum and ischial bone, and adjacent organs such as the bladder, rectum, parietal peritoneum, and major pelvic vascular bundle. The article presents comparative results of invasive diagnosis in patients with pelvic bone sarcomas using open and core needle biopsies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and compare the results of open biopsy and core needle biopsy in patients with malignant bone tumors of the pelvis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In patients (121 individuals, including 51 (42%) males and 70 (68%) females) with primary malignant bone tumors of the pelvis, 90 (74%) core needle biopsies and 31 (26%) open biopsies were performed for morphological diagnosis. The average age of patients was 45 years (18—73 years). Core needle biopsy was performed under computed tomography guidance in 52 (58%) patients, using ultrasound in 23 (26%) patients. Additional navigation during core needle biopsy was not performed in 15 (16%) patients.

RESULTS

The overall diagnostic accuracy using all types of biopsies was 91%. The sensitivity of core needle biopsy was 87%, and open biopsy was 100%. Complications after core needle biopsy were diagnosed in 1% of patients, and after open biopsy in 9% of patients. The influence of navigation type, as well as the maximum tumor size and its localization in the pelvic bones on the sensitivity of core needle biopsy was identified.

CONCLUSION

The obtained results were consistent with data from other clinics. The sensitivity of the technique was 87%, similar to the results of other foreign clinics — 89 and 91%. The number of complications in our study did not exceed 1%. In similar studies, their frequency was 3—5%.

Keywords:

pelvic bone tumors
biopsy
diagnosis

Authors:

Derzhavin V.A.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Bukharov A.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Yadrina A.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Erin D.A.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Branch, National Medical Radiology Research Center

Elkhov D.O.

Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center

Received:

11.09.2023

Accepted:

03.11.2023

Close metadata

References:

  1. Kaprin AD, Starinskii VV, Petrova GV, eds. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2014 godu (zabolevaemost’ i smertnost’). Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU «NMITs radiologii» Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya Rossiiskoi federatsii; 2016. (In Russ.).
  2. Delling G. Diagnostik von Knochentumoren [Diagnosis of bone tumors]. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1998;82:121-132. (In German).
  3. Jansen JA, van de Sande MAJ, Dijkstra PDS. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(1):324-331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2631-x
  4. Mitsuyoshi G, Naito N, Kawai A, Kunisada T, Yoshida A, Yanai H, Dendo S, Yoshino T, Kanazawa S, Ozaki T. Accurate diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions by core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94(1):21-27.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20504
  5. Zerbino DD. Biopsiya: istoriya, sovremennost’, perspektivy [Biopsy: its history, current and future outlook]. Lik Sprava. 1994;(3-4):1-9. (In Russ.).
  6. Cerci J, Bogoni M, Delbeke D. History of image-guided biopsy. In: Cerci J, Fanti S, Delbeke D, eds. Oncological PET/CT with histological confirmation. Springer; 2016;1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27880-3
  7. Craver LF. Diagnosis of malignant lung tumors by aspiration biopsy and by sputum examination. Surgery. 1940;8:947-960. 
  8. Alfi di RJ, Haaga J, Meaney TF, MacIntyre WJ, Gonzalez L, Tarar R, Zelch MG, Boller M, Cook SA, Jelden G. Computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen; a preliminary report. Radiology. 1975;117(2):257-264.  https://doi.org/10.1148/117.2.257
  9. Kasraeian S, Allison DC, Ahlmann ER, Fedenko AN, Menendez LR. A comparison of fine-needle aspiration, core biopsy, and surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of extremity soft tissue masses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(11):2992-3002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1401-x
  10. Maciel MJ, Tyng CJ, Barbosa PN, Bitencourt AG, Matushita Junior JP, Zurstrassen CE, Chung WT, Chojniak R. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of bone lesions: rate of diagnostic success and complications. Radiol Bras. 2014;47(5):269-274.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.0004
  11. Bukharov AV, Karasev AL, Karpenko VYu, Derzhavin VA, Zakharova MA. Minimally invasive biopsy of bone tumors: technical aspects. Oncology. P.A. Hertsen Journal. 2018;(4):52-57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20187452
  12. Mendenhall WM, Indelicato DJ, Scarborough MT, Zlotecki RA, Gibbs CP, Mendenhall NP, Mendenhall CM, Enneking WF. The management of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009;32(4):436-442.  https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e318173a54f
  13. Cormier JN, Pollock RE. Soft tissue sarcomas. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004,54(2):94-109.  https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.54.2.94
  14. Traina F, Errani C, Toscano A, Pungetti C, Fabbri D, Mazzotti A, Donati D, Faldini C. Current concepts in the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(2):e7.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00661
  15. Pohlig F, Kirchhoff C, Lenze U, Schauwecker J, Burgkart R, Rechl H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R. Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res. 2012;17(1):29.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783x-17-29
  16. Hau A, Kim I, Kattapuram S, Hornicek F, Rosenberg AE, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Accuracy of CT-guided biopsies in 359 patients with musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31(6):349-353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-002-0474-3
  17. Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Rose SC; Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):969-975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.011
  18. Veltri A, Bargellini I, Giorgi L, Almeida PAMS, Akhan O. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(10):1501-1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1658-5
  19. Sung KS, Seo SW, Shon MS. The diagnostic value of needle biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1701-1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0835-9
  20. McCarthy EF. CT-guided needle biopsies of bone and soft tissue tumors: a pathologist’s perspective. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(3):181-182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0244-8
  21. Le HB, Lee ST, Munk PL. Image-guided musculoskeletal biopsies. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2010;27(2):191-198.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1253517
  22. Issakov J, Flusser G, Kollender Y, Merimsky O, Lifschitz-Mercer B, Meller I. Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for bone and soft tissue tumors. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003;5(1):28-30. 
  23. Yang YJ, Damron TA. Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128(7):759-764.  https://doi.org/10.5858/2004-128-759-CONCBA
  24. Bickels J, Jelinek JS, Shmookler BM, Neff RS, Malawer MM. Biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. Current concepts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(368):212-219. 
  25. Barrientos-Ruiz I, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, Serrano-Montilla J, Bernabeu-Taboada D, Bernabeu-Taboada JJ. Are biopsy tracts a concern for seeding and local recurrence in sarcomas? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(2):511-518.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5090-y
  26. Ribeiro MB, de Oliveira CR, Filippi RZ, Baptista AM, Caiero MT, Saito CF, Barbosa do Nascimento SA, de Camargo OP. Histopathological study on biopsy track in malignant musculoskeletal tumors. Acta Ortop Bras. 2009;17(5):279-281. 
  27. Adams SC, Potter BK, Pitcher DJ, Temple HT. Office-based core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissue malignancies: an accurate alternative to open biopsy with infrequent complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(10):2774-2780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1422-5
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.