Comparative analysis of results of radical surgical treatment of patients with cancer of left half of the colon and rectum with laparoscopic and open surgical procedures as part of Fast Track Surgery

Negardinov A.Z.

JSC MEDSI Group of Companies, Clinical Hospital No. 1

Kochatkov A.V.

M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University;
JSC MEDSI Group of Companies, Clinical Hospital No. 1

Comparative analysis of results of radical surgical treatment of patients with cancer of left half of the colon and rectum with laparoscopic and open surgical procedures as part of Fast Track Surgery

Authors:

Negardinov A.Z., Kochatkov A.V.

More about the authors

Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2020;9(4): 11‑17

DOI: 10.17116/onkolog2020904111

Downloaded: 24

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Negardinov AZ, Kochatkov AV. Comparative analysis of results of radical surgical treatment of patients with cancer of left half of the colon and rectum with laparoscopic and open surgical procedures as part of Fast Track Surgery. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2020;9(4):11‑17. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog2020904111

Close metadata

AIM OF STUDY

Analysis of results of radical surgical treatment of patients with cancer of left half of the colon and rectum with laparoscopic and open surgical procedures as part of Fast Track Surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis of treatment of 339 patients who underwent radical colon surgery performed by laparoscopic and open method using Fast Track was made. The number of repeated operations, the volume of blood loss, the number of complications and the timing of the recovery postoperative period with open and laparoscopic interventions are analyzed.

RESULTS

According to the results, minimally invasive surgeries are comparable to open surgeries, they have fewer complications, low blood loss, reduce the patient’s need for postoperative pain management, significantly reliably restore intestinal motility, which ensures timely transition to enteral nutrition, and also reduces the recovery time for physical activity and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The use of laparoscopic interventions helps to reduce the number of postoperative complications, as well as accelerate the rehabilitation process and improve the quality of life of patients after radical surgical treatment.

Keywords:

colorectal cancer

colon cancer

rectal cancer

laparoscopic surgery

open surgery

Fast Track

Authors:

Negardinov A.Z.

JSC MEDSI Group of Companies, Clinical Hospital No. 1

Kochatkov A.V.

M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University;
JSC MEDSI Group of Companies, Clinical Hospital No. 1

Received:

13.01.2020

Accepted:

15.03.2020

List of references:

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606-617.
Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis P. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta- analysis update. Int Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(10):1119-1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0703-5
Brown S, Goodfellow P. Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD005199.
Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):704-717. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.704
Allaix M, Furnée E, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Morino M. Energy sources for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is one better than the others? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26(4):264-269. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0076
Haverkamp M, de Roos M, Ong K. The ERAS protocol reduces the length of stay after laparoscopic colectomies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):361-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1877-9
Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop W, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta M, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ; Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3
Green B, Marshall H, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne D, Brown J. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(1):75-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8945
Spanjersberg W, van Sambeeck J, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven C. Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(12):3443-3453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3
Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C, Fazio V. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):83-91.

Close metadata