The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Zheleznyakova I.A.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Volkova O.A.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care

Fedyaev D.V.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education;
Research Financial Institute

Plakhotnik O.S.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care

Mazurov A.M.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care

Lazareva M.L.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care

Kotsenbina E.V.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care

Improving the model of payment for medical care for infertility using assisted reproductive technologies in the program of state guarantees of free medical care to citizens for 2023 and 2024—2025

Authors:

Zheleznyakova I.A., Volkova O.A., Fedyaev D.V., Plakhotnik O.S., Mazurov A.M., Lazareva M.L., Kotsenbina E.V.

More about the authors

Read: 2274 times


To cite this article:

Zheleznyakova IA, Volkova OA, Fedyaev DV, Plakhotnik OS, Mazurov AM, Lazareva ML, Kotsenbina EV. Improving the model of payment for medical care for infertility using assisted reproductive technologies in the program of state guarantees of free medical care to citizens for 2023 and 2024—2025. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2023;45(2):23‑31. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20234502123

Recommended articles:
Cost of supportive cancer care in the Russian Fede­ration. Part 2. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2024;(4):63-73
Changes in diagnosis-related group payment model in the Russian Fede­ration in 2025. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2025;(2):18-30
Medi­cal and social characteristics of mate­rnal deaths after extracorporeal fertilization. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):5-14

References:

  1. Connolly MP, Panda S, Mburu G, Matsaseng T, Kiarie J. Estimating the government public economic benefits attributed to investing in assisted reproductive technology: a South African case study. Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online. 2020;12:14-21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.001
  2. Bezad R, Omrani SE, Benbella A, Assarag B. Access to infertility care services towards Universal Health Coverage is a right and not an option. BMC Health Services Research. 2022;22(1):1089. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08456-7
  3. Isupova OG. Assisted reproductive technologies: new opportunities. Demograficheskoe obozrenie. 2017;4(1):35-64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v4i1.6987
  4. Klitzman R. How much is a child worth? Providers’ and patients’ views and responses concerning ethical and policy challenges in paying for ART. PLoS One. 2017;12 (2):e0171939. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171939
  5. Prag P, Mills MC. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe: Usage and Regulation in the Context of Cross-Border Reproductive Care. Families and Societies. 2015;43:1-23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_14
  6. Bjelica A. [Comparison of in vitro fertilization policy in Serbia and other European countries]. Timočki medicinski glasnik. 2017;42(4):236-244.  https://doi.org/10.5937/tmg1704236B
  7. How much does IVF cost? By Single Care Team, Updated on Aug. 20, 2020. Medically reviewed by Walsh M. Accessed January 01, 2023. https://www.singlecare.com/blog/ivf-cost
  8. The European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE); Wyns C, De Geyter Ch, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Motrenko T, Smeenk J, et al. ART in Europe, 2017: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Human Reproduction Open. 2021;3:hoab026. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab026
  9. European IVF Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE); Wyns C, De Geyter Ch, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Motrenko T, Smeenk J, et al. ART in Europe, 2018: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Human Reproduction Open. 2022;3:hoac022. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac022
  10. Rusanova NE, Gordeeva VL. Assisted reproductive technologies: needs and regulation in low birth rates. Narodonaselenie. 2016;73(3):34-46. (In Russ.).
  11. Schetnaya palata Rossijskoj Federatsii. Otchet o rezul’tatakh ekspertno-analiticheskogo meropriyatiya «Analiz effektivnosti raskhodovaniya sredstv obyazatel’nogo meditsinskogo strakhovaniya v 2019 godu i istekshem periode 2020 goda pri provedenii protsedury ekstrakorporal’nogo oplodotvoreniya». Accessed January 24, 2023. (In Russ.). https://ach.gov.ru/upload/iblock/9b0/9b06bc06ddedb49a807822ad7cd21621.pdf
  12. Omelyanovskiy VV, Avxentyeva MV, Zheleznyakova IA, Zuev AV, Zueva YuS, Lazareva ML, et al. Main changes in the model of diagnosis-related groups in 2022. Meditsinskie tekhnologii. Otsenka i vybor. 2022;44(2):8-21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech2022440218
  13. Kravchuk YaN, Kalugina AS, Bystrova OV, Shlykova SA. Efficiency and outcomes of programs with cryopreservation of embryos in the protocols of assisted reproductive technologies. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznej. 2014;63(4):39-46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD63439-46

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.