OBJECTIVE
To study the possibilities and results of reconstruction of caval veins.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We analyzed the results of reconstruction of caval veins in 31 patients (19 men and 12 women) including superior vena cava (SVC) in 5 cases and inferior vena cava (IVC) in 26 cases. Penetrating wounds with vascular damage were found in 8 patients. Iatrogenic damage to IVC was observed in 19 patients (nephrectomy for kidney cancer — 2, nephrectomy for secondary kidney wrinkling — 1, echinococcectomy from retroperitoneal space — 1, adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors — 5, right-sided lumbar sympathectomy — 1, resection of abdominal aortic aneurysm — 1, resection of a large retroperitoneal tumor — 6). Iatrogenic damage to SVC occurred in 2 patients during resection of mediastinal tumor. In other 4 cases, elective surgery for mediastinal tumor (1), pancreatic head cancer (2) and liver alveococcosis (1) was accompanied by resection and replacement of caval veins.
RESULTS
All interventions for caval vein injury were performed under adequate infusion therapy. Seven (22.6%) patients died. One patient with blunt chest trauma and damage to SVC died during thoracotomy. In another patient, infrarenal IVC was intersected during mobilization of retroperitoneal hydatid cyst that required ligation for vital indications. High venous hypertension below the ligature led to eruption of sutures on the venous stump. The patient died from hypovolemia after additional IVC ligation. Other 5 patients died in early postoperative period without leaving the state of shock. These patients had damage to retrohepatic segment of IVC (1), vascular-organ (1) and iatrogenic (3) injuries. One patient died from pulmonary embolism, two patients — from venous bleeding between the 2nd and the 5th postoperative days. Patients died before reoperations. Two patients with postoperative bleeding underwent redo surgery with favorable outcomes. One patient underwent redo surgery for peritonitis with a favorable result. Thus, 7 (22.6%) patients with caval vein injury died in intraoperative and early postoperative period. Non-specific complications occurred in 4 (12.9%) patients. These events were corrected by conservative measures. Other 24 (77.4%) patients with traumatic and iatrogenic injuries of caval veins were discharged.
CONCLUSION
Caval vein injury is less common event compared to other vascular damages. Nevertheless, this complication is accompanied by severe blood loss, shock and hypovolemia. We can only assume damage to a great vessel in patients with penetrating wounds before surgery and appropriate symptoms of internal bleeding. However, final diagnosis is made during surgery. Hemostasis is a responsible and difficult surgical stage in these patients. There is usually no alternative to reconstructive surgery in these cases. However, ligation is permissible in extremely ill patients and only in infrarenal segment of IVC. Vascular suture is a more acceptable and effective option for reconstruction. However, patch repair is advisable for large defects. In our opinion, this approach is better regarding long-term patency compared to total replacement with synthetic prostheses.
