New technologies for stomach resection surgery in atypical conditions

Vlasov A.P.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202009120

Vlasov A.P.

Ogarev Mordovia State University

ORCID: 0000-0003-4731-2952

New technologies for stomach resection surgery in atypical conditions

Authors:

Vlasov A.P.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(9): 20‑27

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202009120

Read: 3672 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Vlasov AP. New technologies for stomach resection surgery in atypical conditions. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(9):20‑27. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202009120

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To develop original technologies that simplify and increase an effectiveness of stomach resection in case of «difficult» duodenal ulcers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Healing of gastroduodenostomy was experimentally observed under tension of anastomosed segments. In the first group (12), gastric resection was performed in a volume of 2/3 without tension of the anastomosed sections using a two-row suture. In the second group (12), stomach resection was accompanied by modeling of tension of the anastomosed sections under a pressure equal to 2.5—3.6 N (245—350 g). In the third group (12), gastric resection was performed in the same fashion as in the second group, but gastroduodenostomy was sutured using a single-row everted seams and hypotraction serous-muscular sutures. The results of Billroth-I gastrectomy using traditional (n=86) (classic double-row Lambert-Albert suture) and developed technologies (n=112) were analyzed in patients with complicated gastric and duodenal ulcers.

RESULTS

The obvious advantages of the developed technologies have been experimentally proved for gastric resection under tension of anastomosed sections. There was no inconsistency of gastroduodenostomy, whereas traditional two-row suture was followed by this complication in 58,3% of cases. A favorable course was based on the relatively low inhibition of tissue blood supply in regenerating structures that was manifested by significantly less redox potential. Reduced lipid peroxidation and phospholipase activity in tissue structures along the suture line was also recorded. We obtained the positive clinical results of this approach in patients with complicated course of duodenal ulcer. Billroth-I gastrectomy was performed in all patients. Gastroduodenostomy failure was absent. Overall postoperative morbidity was 6,3%. In case of double-row anastomosis, suture failure occurred in 9,3% of cases, incidence of complications — 57,0%. This procedure was performed for gastric ulcer as a rule.

CONCLUSION

The developed technologies greatly simplify resection of stomach and duodenum in the most difficult atypical conditions and ensure physiological Billroth-I surgery. The obvious benefit of this technology is simplified resection per se that makes it accessible to novice surgeons.

Keywords:

gastric resection

everted suture

hypotraction sutures

regeneration

postoperative complications

Authors:

Vlasov A.P.

Ogarev Mordovia State University

ORCID: 0000-0003-4731-2952

Received:

18.04.2020

Accepted:

28.04.2020

Close metadata

References:

Abdullazhanov BR, Abdirajimov BA, Bozorov NJe, Nishanov MF. Primary resection of the stomach with perforated duodenal ulcers. Gastrojenterologija Sankt-Peterburga. 2011;2-3:1-2. (In Russ.).
Kulikov EP, Mercalov SA. The use of gastric resection with preservation of the pylorus in patients with gastric cancer. Onkologija. Zhurnal im. PA Gercena. 2013;1(6):18-21. (In Russ.).
Sazhin VP, Naumov IA, Klimov DE, Nuzhdihin AV. Laparoscopic resection of the stomach according to Billroth-1. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. NI Pirogova. 2005; 1:21-24. (In Russ.).
Sazhin AV, Ivahov GB, Stradymov EA, Petuhov VA. Surgical treatment of perforated ulcers of the stomach and duodenum complicated by peritonitis: laparotomy or laparoscopy? (message 1). Jendoskopicheskaja hirurgija. 2019;25(3):51-58. (In Russ.).
Brekhov EI, Repin IG, Kalinnikov VV, Repin DI, Timoshkin SP. The role of the rockall and Glasgow — blatchford integral scales in predicting recurrence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dokazatel’naya gastroenterologiya. 2019;8(3):20-26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/dokgastro2019803120
Skarstein A, Hoisaeter PA. Perforated peptic ulcer: a comparison of long term results following partial gastric resection or simple closure. British Journal of Surgery. 2005;63(9):700-703.
Vlasov AP, Kukosh MV, Saraev VV, Stepanov JuP. Gastric resection surgery. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NGMA; 2005.
Zajcev OV, Tarasenko SV, Natal’skij AA, Morozov KS. Technical aspects of gastric resection in difficult duodenal ulcers//Tihookeanskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2011; 3:75-79. (In Russ.).]
Lubjanskij VG, Nasonov SV. Acute pancreatitis after gastrectomy with low duodenal ulcers. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. NI Pirogova. 2001; 3:8-11. (In Russ.).
Volostnikov EV, Linchenko VI, Shopen GN. Ischemic necrosis of the stomach stump after subtotal distal gastric resection. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. NI Pirogova. 2013; 11:61-62. (In Russ.).
Brehov EI, Mizin SP, Repin IG, Shipova AA. The rationale for the method of restoring the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract after resection of the stomach. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. NI Pirogova. 2013; 6:8-13. (In Russ.).
Fedoseev AV, Luzgin DA. The rationale for the method of restoring the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract after resection of the stomach. Palliativnaja medicina i reabilitacija. 2005; 2:28. (In Russ.).
Vlasov AP, Saraev VV, Stepanov JuP, Rubcov OJu. New technologies in the surgery of «difficult» duodenal ulcers. Hirurgija. 2008; 8:44-48. (In Russ.).
Gorskij VA, Agapov MA, Klimov AE i dr. The problem of the consistency of the intestinal suture//Prakticheskaja medicina. Hirurgija. 2015;5(81):35-40. (In Russ.).