Prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

Kriger A.G.; Gorin D.S.; Kaldarov A.R.; Galkin G.V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202011161

Kriger A.G.

Russian Research Center of Radiology;
Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0000-0002-4567-8312

Gorin D.S.

National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky of Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

SPIN RSCI: 4284-4275
Scopus AuthorID: 35299202200
ORCID: 0000-0002-6452-4458

Kaldarov A.R.

National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky of Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

Galkin G.V.

National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky of Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

Prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

Authors:

Kriger A.G., Gorin D.S., Kaldarov A.R., Galkin G.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(11): 61‑65

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202011161

Read: 2245 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Kriger AG, Gorin DS, Kaldarov AR, Galkin GV. Prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(11):61‑65. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202011161

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

Prospective randomized investigation of the efficiency of somatostatin analogues and glucocorticoids in pancreatic fistula prevention after pancreatoduodenectomy by using.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In period from December 2018 till March 2020 78 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatobilliary tumors in department of abdominal surgery of National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky. Intraoperative frozen section investigation of pancreatic functioning acinar structures (FAS) was held for all patients. 38 patients had more than 40% of FAC and were related with high risk of pancreatic fistula (PF), while 40 patients with less than 40% FAC were included in low risk of PF group. In both groups patients were randomized to main and control subgroups. In main subgroup of high risk group patients combination of somatostatin analogues and glucocorticoids was used, while in control subgroup patients received only somatostatin analogue. In low risk of PF group patients of main subgroup preventively got somatostatin analogue, while control group patients had no specific prophylaxis of PF. To assess the effect of drug prophylaxis on the development of pancreatic fistula we used logistic regression models with the inclusion of the drug use factor as an independent variable.

RESULTS

25 patients were included in main subgroup of high risk group. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CRPF) developed in 14 (56%) cases. From 13 patients of control subgroup CRPF developed in 5 (38%) cases. In main subgroup of low risk group 18 patients were included and 3 (16%) of them had CRPF. In control subgroup were 22 patients and there were no cases of CRPF.

CONCLUSION

In our series combination of somatostatin analogue and glucocorticoid didn’t show efficiency in prevention of CRPF in high risk patients, although difference between subgroups wasn’t statistically significant (p=0.34). In low risk group patients prophylactic use of somatostatin analogue also didn’t show decline of CRPF incidence and the difference between subgroups also wasn’t statistically significant (p=0.46).

Keywords:

pancreatoduodenectomy

pancreatic fistula

glucocorticoid

somatostatin analogue

Authors:

Kriger A.G.

Russian Research Center of Radiology;
Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education

ORCID: 0000-0002-4567-8312

Gorin D.S.

National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky of Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

SPIN RSCI: 4284-4275
Scopus AuthorID: 35299202200
ORCID: 0000-0002-6452-4458

Kaldarov A.R.

National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky of Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

Galkin G.V.

National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky of Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

Received:

14.09.2020

Accepted:

03.10.2020

Close metadata

References:

Kriger AG, Gorin DS, Kaldarov AR, Paklina OV, Raevskaya MB, Berelavichus SV, Akhtanin EA, Smirnov AV. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Methodological aspects and results. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gertsena. 2016;5(5):15-21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20165515-21
Deng LH, Xiong JJ, Xia Q. Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10(1):37-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12202
Grace PA, Pitt HA, Tompkins RK, DenBesten L, Longmire WP Jr. Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 1986;151:141-149.
Kriger AG, Ahtanin EA, Zemskov VM, Gorin DS, Smirnov AV, Berelavichus SV, Kozlova MN, Shishkina NS, Glotov AV. Risk Factors and prevention of postoperative pancreatitis after pancreatectomy. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2016;7:4-10. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201674-10
Alghamdi AA, Jawas AM, Hart RS. Use of octreotide for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Surg. 2007;50(6):459-466.
Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, Hermanek P, Sulkowski U, Becker H, Schafmayer A, Baca I, Lorenz D, Meister R, Kremer B, Wagner P, Witte J, Zurmayer EL, Saeger H-D, Rieck B, Dollinger P, Glaser K, Teichmann R, Konradt J, Gaus W, Dennler H-J, Welzel D, Hans G. Beger HG. Role of octreotide in prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg. 1992;163:125-130.
Laaninen M, Sand J, Nordback I, Vasama K, Laukkarinen J. Perioperative Hydrocortisone Reduces Major Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2016;264(5):696-702. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001883
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
Revishvili ASh, Kriger AG, Vishnevskij VA, Smirnov AV, Berelavichus SV, Gorin DS, Ahtanin EA, Kaldarov AR, Raevskaja MB, Zaharova MA. Current issues in pancreatic surgery. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2018;9:5-14. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20180915
Sarr MG. The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196(4):556-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00104-2
Antila A, Siiki A, Sand J, Laukkarinen J. Perioperative hydrocortisone treatment reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after open distal pancreatectomy. A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Pancreatology. 2019;19(5):786-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2019.05.457
Tarvainen T, Sirén J, Kokkola A, Sallinen V. Effect of Hydrocortisone vs Pasireotide on Pancreatic Surgery Complications in Patients With High Risk of Pancreatic Fistula: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(4):291-298. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6019