Short-term outcomes of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal junction cancer

Kit O.I.; Kolesnikov E.N.; Katsieva T.B.; Kozhushko M.A.; Myagkov R.E.; Sanamyants S.V.; Snezhko A.V.; Trifanov V.S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201908117

Kit O.I.

Rostov Research Institute of Oncology, Rostov-na-Donu, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-3061-6108

Kolesnikov E.N.

Rostov Research Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rostov

Katsieva T.B.

Rostov Research Institute for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Kozhushko M.A.

Rostov Research Cancer Institute of Health Ministry of the Russian Federation, Russia

Myagkov R.E.

Rostov Research Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rostov

Sanamyants S.V.

Rostov Research Institute for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Snezhko A.V.

Rossiĭskiĭ nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ onkologicheskiĭ institut Rosmedtekhnologiĭ, Rostov-na-Donu

Trifanov V.S.

Rostov Research Institute for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Short-term outcomes of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal junction cancer

Authors:

Kit O.I., Kolesnikov E.N., Katsieva T.B., Kozhushko M.A., Myagkov R.E., Sanamyants S.V., Snezhko A.V., Trifanov V.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;(8): 17‑21

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201908117

Read: 7956 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Kit OI, Kolesnikov EN, Katsieva TB, et al. . Short-term outcomes of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal junction cancer. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;(8):17‑21. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201908117

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

Objective — to confirm simplicity, safety and efficacy of stapling devices for gastroesophageal anastomosis (including those formed in mediastinum) in the treatment of gastroesophageal junction cancer. Material and methods. There were 147 patients with cardioesophageal cancer. Tumors Siewert type II and III were predominant (44.2 and 40.3%, respectively). Simultaneous procedures were performed in 30.6% of cases. Results. Postoperative complication rate was 42.2%. Pneumonia was the most common. Postoperative mortality was 2.7%.

Keywords:

oncology

esophagus

anastomosis

Authors:

Kit O.I.

Rostov Research Institute of Oncology, Rostov-na-Donu, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-3061-6108

Kolesnikov E.N.

Rostov Research Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rostov

Katsieva T.B.

Rostov Research Institute for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Kozhushko M.A.

Rostov Research Cancer Institute of Health Ministry of the Russian Federation, Russia

Myagkov R.E.

Rostov Research Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Rostov

Sanamyants S.V.

Rostov Research Institute for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Snezhko A.V.

Rossiĭskiĭ nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ onkologicheskiĭ institut Rosmedtekhnologiĭ, Rostov-na-Donu

Trifanov V.S.

Rostov Research Institute for Oncology, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Close metadata

References:

Ibrayev MA. Cardioesophageal and gastroesophageal cancer: features of lymphogenous metastasis, principles of surgical treatment and factors of prognosis. Vestnik RONS N.N. Blokhin RAMN. 2015;1(26):23-32. (In Russ.)
Kit O, Snezhko A, Maximov A, Kolesnikov E, Trifanov V, Myagkov R, Chizhikov N, Fomenko Y, Kozhushko M. Personalisation approach to surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014;40(11):S154-S154.
Volkov MYu. Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical treatment and quality of life in patients with cardioesophageal cancer: PhD thesis. Tomsk. 2014. (In Russ.)
Turkin IN. Strategy of stomach cancer surgery: Dis... Dr. honey. Sciences. M. 2013. (In Russ.)
Kshirsagar AY, Karan S, Phadke A, Bhagaria G. Comparison of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomoses in GI Surgeries Based on Clinical Practice at Krishna Hospital. Karad International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value. 2015;6(1), January 2017 www.ijsr.net
Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008;91(5):681-685.
Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(4):1154-1160.
Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1043-1050.
Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, et al. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(6):915-921.