Eras protocol for laparoscopic Frey procedure

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Synchronous primary multiple cancer: distal cholangiocarcinoma of the intrapancreatic common bile duct and intraductal papillary mucinous tumor associated with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8):57-63

Robotic enucleation of pancreatic insulinoma. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8):64-68

Strangulated hernia of the foramen of Winslow complicated by acute colonic obstruction. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8):92-95

Severe combined injury of the rectum and bladder in a child. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8):101-107

Effectiveness of organizational-functional model for complex rehabilitation of children requiring upper limb replacement for congenital diseases. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2024;(2):40-47

Effectiveness of physical rehabilitation methods based on the impact of eccentric load in upper limb injuries. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(3):13-17

Rehabilitation of patients with facial neuropathy. Regenerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digital and Predictive Medicine. 2024;(2):28-41

A clinical case of parasitic fibroids on the mesentery of the sigmoid colon. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(3):105-110

Possibilities of mirror therapy in cognitive rehabilitation after stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(8-2):64-71

Results of the impact of personalized rehabilitation on the quality of life of men after laparoscopic prostatectomy. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;(4):22-28

Aim — to assess the use of ERAS in laparoscopic Frey procedure. Material and methods. From August 2012 to November 2017 laparoscopic Frey procedure were performed in 35 patients. Fully laparoscopic were performed 31 (88.5%) procedures. We use fast-track protocol from 13 patients. We included from statistic analyses patients where procedure was changed or was conversion or was simultaneous procedure. The total number of patients analyzed was 27. The patients were divided into two groups: I — before the fast-track protocol (n=11), II — after the protocol implementation (n=16). Results. The operating time was 460 (365—530) minutes in I group and 420 (295—540) minutes in II group. Blood loss was 150 (5—300) and 150 (40—700) ml. The median postoperative stay period was 10 (5—25) days and 6.5 (3—11) days (p=0.007). Conclusion. The combination of laparoscopic technologies and fast-track protocol reduces the duration of the postoperative stay period.

Keywords:

laparoscopy

Frey procedure

rehabilitation

ERAS

fast-track

pancreas

Authors:

Izrailov R.E.

kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii #2 MGMSU

SPIN RSCI: 7121-2776
Scopus AuthorID: 56571607000
ORCID: 0000-0001-7254-5411

Tsvirkun V.V.

KB #119 FMBA RF

Alikhanov R.B.

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center;
Department of Surgery, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Andrianov A.V.

Moscow Clinical scientific and practical center;
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A.I. Evdokimov, Moscow

List of references:

Hendry PO, van Dam RM, Bukkems SFFW, McKeown DW, Parks RW, Preston T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laxatives and oral nutritional supplements within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following liver resection. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1198-1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7120
Schoetz DJ, Bockler M, Rosenblatt MS, et al. «Ideal» length of stay after colectomy: whose ideal? Dis. Colon. Rectum. 1997;40:806-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02055437
Douglas WW, Henrik K. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001;322:473-476. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473
Dorcaratto D, Grande L, Pera M. Enhanced recovery in gastrointestinal surgery: upper gastrointestinal surgery. Dig Surg. 2013;30:70e8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000350701
Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G. Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:318e26. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588412x13171221592410
Izbicki JR, et al. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. Annals of surgery. 1995;221(4):350-358. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199504000-00004
Izbicki JR, et al. Extended drainage versus resection in surgery for chronic pancreatitis. A prospective randomized trial comparing the longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy combined with local pancreatic head excision with the pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Annals of surgery. 1998;228(6):771-779. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199812000-00008
Khat’kov IE, Tsvirkun VV, Izrailov RE, Alikhanov RB, Andrianov AV. The first experience of laparoscopic operations for patients with chronic pancreatitis. Resection of the head of the pancreas by chronic pancreatitis. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2014;19(3):10-15. (In Russ.)
Cooper MA, Tejwant SD, Makary MA. Laparoscopic Frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis. Surg Laparasc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24 e16-e20. https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0b013e31828f6edf
Chun-Lu Tan, Hao Zhang, Ke-Zhou Li. Single center experience in selecting the laparoscopic Frey procedure for chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterology. 2015;21(44):1007-9327. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12644
Kilburn DJ, et al. Early Experience with Laparoscopic Frey Procedure for Chronic Pancreatitis: a Case Series and Review of Literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3343-4
Büchler MW, et al. A proposal for a new clinical classification of chronic pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterology. 2009;9:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230x-9-93
Khatkov IE, Khisamov AA, Izrailov RE, Tsvirkun VV. Fast-track Protocol for Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenal Resection: the First Experience. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii. 2014;4:71-75. (In Russ.)
Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Badran A, et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery programme after pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-centre UK pilot study. Pancreatology. 2013;13(1):58-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2012.11.312
Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, et al. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg. 2008;95(11):1387-1393. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6324
Barton JG. Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Pancreatic Surgery. Surg Clin N Am. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.07.003
Berberat PO, Ingold H, Gulbinas A, et al. Fast track–different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(7):880-887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0167-2
Coolsen MM, van Dam RM, Chigharoe A, et al. Improving outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: experiences with implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Dig Surg. 2014;31(3):177-184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363583
di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, et al. A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396(3):345-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0707-1
Kennedy EP, Grenda TR, Sauter PK, et al. Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(5):938-944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0803-0
Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK, et al. Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution — the first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(5):917-923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.057
Nikfarjam M, Weinberg L, Low N, et al. A fast track recovery program significantly reduces hospital length of stay following uncomplicated pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP. 2013;14(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/1223
Porter GA, Pisters PW, Mansyur C, et al. Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(7):484-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0484-0
Robertson N, Gallacher PJ, Peel N, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery programme following pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(10):700-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00521.x
Vanounou T, Pratt W, Fischer JE, et al. Deviation-based cost modeling: a novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(4):570-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.025
Xueli Bai, Xiaoyu Zhang, Fangyan Lu, Guogang Li, Shunliang Gao, Jianying Lou, Yun Zhang, Tao Ma, Ji Wang, Wei Chen, Bingfeng Huang, Tingbo Liang. The implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program following pancreatic surgery in an academic medical center of China. Pancreatology. xxx. 2016:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2016.03.018

Close metadata