Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted procedures for chronic complications of diverticular disease

Achkasov S.I.

State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia

Shelygin Yu.A.

A.N. Ryzhikh State Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia;
Department of Coloproctology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia

Moskalev A.I.

Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Trubacheva Yu.L.

Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Senashenko S.A.

Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted procedures for chronic complications of diverticular disease

Authors:

Achkasov S.I., Shelygin Yu.A., Moskalev A.I., Trubacheva Yu.L., Senashenko S.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(3): 16‑23

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2018316-23

Downloaded: 14

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Achkasov SI, Shelygin YuA, Moskalev AI, Trubacheva YuL, Senashenko SA. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted procedures for chronic complications of diverticular disease. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(3):16‑23. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018316-23

Подписка 2025 (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)

Close metadata

Aim. To estimate efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted procedures for chronic complications of diverticular disease (DD). Material and methods. It was made a prospective comparative study within 2007—2015. Inclusion criteria were verified chronic DD (>6 weeks after the first attack) and bowel resection followed by primary anastomosis. Exclusion criteria: contraindications for pneumoperitoneum, BMI ≥35 kg/m2, infiltrate dimension >10 cm, preoperatively non-excluded neoplasm. Results. 233 patients with chronic DD underwent elective surgery, 136 (58.4%) of them were included in the study. There were 80 (58.8%) females aged 57.2±6.2 (24—83) years. Main group consisted of 75 patients after laparoscopic-assisted procedures, 61 were in control group (open ones). Both groups were homogeneous in age, gender, BMI, type of chronic complications, extent of inflammation, extent of bowel resection, surgery time (211.1 vs 206.3 min; p=0.16), incidence of preventive stoma (12.9 vs 19.7%; p=0.32) and complications rate (10.7 vs 14.7%; p=0.47). Maximal time of surgery was noted in case of chronic abdominal mass with statistically significance for main group (240.0±12.2 min vs 207.6±13.7 min; р=0.01). Conversion rate was 12.0% in main group. Main group showed significant higher rate of stapler anastomoses (66.7 vs 22.9%; р<0.0001), less intraoperative blood loss (100 ml vs 350 ml; р=0.001). Early postoperative period was significantly shorter in main group (9.5±0.4 days vs 12.9±1.2 days, р=0.02). Conclusion. Laparoscopic-assisted procedures for diverticular disease are associated with more favorable early postoperative period with the same complication rate. Technical complexity and operative time depend on the extent of pelvic inflammatory changes.

Keywords:

short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted procedures

surgical treatment

chronic complications of diverticular disease

Authors:

Achkasov S.I.

State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia

Shelygin Yu.A.

Moskalev A.I.

Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Trubacheva Yu.L.

Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Senashenko S.A.

Ryzhikh State Research Coloproctology Center of Healthcare Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

List of references:

Timerbulatov MV, Gaynutdinov FM, Mehdiyev DI, Khasanov SR, Timerbulatov ShV, Bagautdinov FZ. Diverticular disease of colon complicated by a fistula. Koloproktologiya. 2013;3(45):21-25. (In Russ.)
Achkasov SI, Moskalyov AI, Zhuchenko AP, Orlova LP, Zarodnyuk IV, Skridlevskij SN, Markova EV, Lihter MS, Trubachyova YuL, Dzhanaev YuA. Fistulas of the colon as a complication of diverticular disease. Koloproktologiya. 2011;4(38):11-19. (In Russ.)
Ivashkin VT, Shelygin YuA, Achkasov SI. Diagnostics and treatment of diverticular disease of the colon: guidelines of the Russian gastroenterological Association and Russian Association of Coloproctology. Ross z gastroenterol gepatol koloproktol. 2016;24(6):65-80. (In Russ.)
Salamov KN, Vorob’ev GI, Achkasov SI, Moskalyov AI, Bolihov KV. The definition of the boundaries of resection of the colon in diverticulosis. Hirurgiya. 2001;1:80-86. (In Russ.)
Shelygin YuA, Achkasov SI, Moskalev AI. Classification of diverticular disease. Coloproctology. 2014;4(50):5-13. (In Russ.)
Shelygin YuA, Achkasov SI, Orlova LP, Trubacheva YuL, Moskalev AI, Malynovska OA. The role of intraoperative ultrasound in chronic complications of diverticular disease. Annals of surgery. 2016;21:1-2:106-113. (In Russ.)
Alves A, Panis Y, Slim K, et al. French multicentre prospective observational study of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1520-1525.
Andeweg CS, Berg R, Staal JB, ten Broek RP, van Goor H. Patient-reported outcomes after conservative or surgical management of recurrent and chronic complaints of diverticulitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(2):183-190. Epub 2015 Aug 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.020
Gervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T, Schiffer E, Morel P. A prospective, randomized, single-blind trial of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg. 2010;252:3-8.
Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1179-1186.
Daher R, Barouki E, Chouillard E. Laparoscopic treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease: A review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(2):134-142. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i2.134
Jones OM. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. BMJ. 2011;343:8029. (Published 28 December 2011). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8029
Jones OM, Stevenson AR, Clark D, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1092-1097.
Feingold D, Steele SR, Lee S, Kaiser A, Boushey R, Buie WD, Rafferty JF. Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(3):284-294.
Klarenbeek BR, Samuels M, van der Wal MA, van der Peet DL, Meijerink WJ, Cuesta MA. Indications for elective sigmoid resection in diverticular disease. Ann Surg. 2010;251(4):670-674.
Klarenbeek BR, Veenhof AA, Bergamaschi R, et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial: short term results of the Sigma Trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249:39-44.
Purkayastha S, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic vs open surgery for diverticular disease: a metaanalysis of nonrandomized studies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:446-463.
Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Khatri K, Cheek E, Baig MK. Elective open versus laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis with the Sigma trial. World J Surg. 2010;34(12):2883-2901.
Simianu VV, et al. The impact of elective colon resection on rates of emergency surgery for diverticulitis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):123-129
Vennix S, Morton DG, Hahnloser D, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Research Committee of the European Society of Coloproctocology. Systematic review of evidence and consensus on diverticulitis: an analysis of national and international guidelines. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(11): 866-878.

Close metadata