The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

O. Shirinbek

SM-Clinic LLC

S.N. Odinokova

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Closure of Saphenous Veins

Authors:

O. Shirinbek, S.N. Odinokova

More about the authors

Journal: Journal of Venous Disorders. 2021;15(4): 297‑303

DOI: 10.17116/flebo202115041297

Read: 3396 times

Contact the author
Table of contents

CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVE CLOSURE OF SAPHENOUS VEINS
CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVE CLOSURE OF SAPHENOUS VEINS

To cite this article:

Shirinbek O, Odinokova SN. Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Closure of Saphenous Veins. Journal of Venous Disorders. 2021;15(4):297‑303. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202115041297

Подписка 2026 Флебология (Journal of Venous Disorders)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Inva­sive Treatment of Recu­rrent Vari­cose Veins in Patients with Femo­ral Vein Inco­mpetence. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2025;(3):156-163
A Topi­cal Agent Based on Reco­mbinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor and Silver Sulfadiazine Acce­lerates the Healing of Venous (Chronic) Ulcers: A Prospective Comparative Non-Randomized Study ESKIZ. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2025;(4):284-294
Diosmin and Other Venoactive Drugs: Mechanisms of Action, Current and Future Indi­cations for Use. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2025;(4):307-314
Hype­rsensitivity Skin Reactions After Cyanoacrylate Adhe­sive Closure of Vari­cose Veins: 5-Year Treatment Outcomes. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2026;(1):42-49
Effe­ctiveness of 600 mg Diosmin in Patients with Venous Edema and Symptoms in Real Life Practice. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2026;(1):50-56
Effi­cacy and Safety of Regu­latory Vascular Poly­peptides in Chro­nic Venous Diseases of the Lower Extremities: Resu­lts of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2026;(2):89-96
Treatment of giant vari­cose veins of the lower extremities using total endo­venous laser coagulation. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(8):125-130
Pharmacological support stra­tegies following endo­venous laser abla­tion in patients with vari­cose veins. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(12):119-130
Rela­tionship between chro­nic heart and venous insu­fficiency: possible mechanisms and clinical research findings. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2026;(2):103-108
The role of gene­tic poly­morphisms in deve­lopment and progression of vari­cose veins. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2026;(3):46-52
Abstract:

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is widespread among world population and has an important medical and socio-economic significance. Varicose veins of the lower extremities are one of the most common clinical forms of CVD characterized by primary dilatation of saphenous veins. The main concept of surgical treatment is elimination of abnormal venous reflux. Varicose vein treatment modalities are constantly evolving and undergo modifications. Endovenous technologies are gradually replacing open surgery. Thermal tumescent (TT) methods, including radiofrequency and laser ablation, have been preferred for elimination of abnormal venous reflux for more than two decades. However, TT methods have certain drawbacks that inspired development of new approaches in varicose vein treatment. Non-thermal non-tumescent methods, such as cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC), were introduced as a natural step towards minimally invasive surgical treatment. The basic principle of this procedure is targeted endovenous delivery of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate that leads to instant adhesion and vein occlusion. CAC is performed without tumescent anesthesia and thermal effect on the vein wall. The advantages of CAC are less perioperative pain, quickness of the procedure, no postoperative compression, fast recovery and high patient comfort. This review is dedicated to the advent of CAC, major international and Russian clinical results of its usage, advantages, side-effects and complications.

Keywords:

cyanoacrylate adhesive closure
cyanoacrylate embolization
varicose veins
non-thermal non-tumescent methods

Authors:

O. Shirinbek

SM-Clinic LLC

S.N. Odinokova

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Received:

03.09.2021

Accepted:

12.10.2021

Close metadata

References:

  1. Seliverstov EI, Avak’yants IP, Nikishkov AS, Zolotuhin IA. Epidemiology of Chronic Venous Disease. Flebologiya. 2016;10(1):35-42.  https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo201610135-42
  2. Robertson L, Evans C, Fowkes F. Epidemiology of chronic venous disease. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2008;23(3):103-111.  https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2007.007061
  3. Raetz J, Wilson M, Collins K. Varicose Veins: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(11):682-688. 
  4. Bootun R, Onida S, Lane T, Davies A. Varicose veins and their management. Surgery (Oxford). 2016;34(4):165-171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2016.02.002
  5. Sincos I, Baptista A, Coelho Neto F, Labropoulos N, Alledi LB, Marins EM, Puggina J, Belczak SQ, Cardoso MG, Aun R. Prospective randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and complete saphenous vein stripping in patients with mild to moderate chronic venous disease with a 3-year follow-up. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019;17(2):eAO4526. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4526
  6. Jaworucka-Kaczorowska A, Oszkinis G, Huber J, Wiertel-Krawczuk A, Gabor E, Kaczorowski P. Saphenous vein stripping surgical technique and frequency of saphenous nerve injury. Phlebology. 2015;30(3):210-216.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514539316
  7. Lurie F, Creton D, Eklof B. Prospective randomised study of Endovenous Radiofrequency Obliteration (Closure) Versus Ligation and Vein Stripping (EVOLVeS): 2-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(1):67-73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.04.007
  8. Rasmussen L, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, Eklof B. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. British Journal of Surgery. 2011;98(8):1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7555
  9. Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD005624. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3
  10. Stoyko YuM, Kirienko AI, Zatevakhin II, Pokrovsky AV, Karpenko AA, Zolotukhin IA, Sapelkin SV, Ilyukhin EA, Gavrilov SG, Porembskaya OYa, Borsuk DA, Seliverstov EI, Alukhanyan OA, Andriyashkin AV, Andriyashkin VV, Barinov VE, Belentsov SM, Bogdanets LI, Bredikhin RA, Bukina OV, Burleva EP, Vakhitov MSh, Vinogradov LA, Volkov AYu, Golovanova OV, Guzhkov ON, Ivanov EV, Katelnitskaya OV, Katorkin SE, Kletskin AE, Koshevoy AP, Krylov AYu, Kudykin MN, Kuzovlev SP, Laberko LA, Larin SI, Lishov DE, Lobastov KV, Mazayshvili KV, Markin SM, Parikov MA, Pelevin AV, Potapov MP, Pryadko SI, Rapovka VG, Sabelnikov VV, Slavin DA, Sokolov AL, Soldatsky EYu, Sonkin IN, Starodubtsev VN, Subbotin YuG, Suchkov IA, Sushkov SA, Tolstikhin VYu, Fokin AA, Khitariyan AG, Khodkevich MB, Khorev NG, Tsukanov YuT, Chabbarov RG, Chernookov AN, Chechetka DYu, Shevela AI, Shimanko AI, Shonov OA, Yashkin MN, Bogachev VYu, Bubnova NA, Dibirov MD, Zhukov BN, Kalinin RE, Katelnitsky II, Plechev VV, Shaydakov EV, Shulutko AM. Diagnostics and Treatment of Chronic Venous Disease: Guidelines of Russian Phlebological Association. Flebologiya. 2018;3:188. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo20187031146
  11. Varicose veins: diagnosis and management. NICE; 2013. Accessed August 14, 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG168
  12. Gloviczki P. Handbook of venous and lymphatic disorders: guidelines of the American Venous Forum. 4th ed. NY: CRC Press; 2017.
  13. Wittens C, Davies AH, Bækgaard N, Broholm R, Cavezzi A, Chastanet S, de Wolf M, Eggen C, Giannoukas A, Gohel M, Kakkos S, Lawson J, Noppeney T, Onida S, Pittaluga P, Thomis S, Toonder I, Vuylsteke M, Esvs Guidelines Committee, Kolh P, de Borst GJ, Chakfé N, Debus S, Hinchliffe R, Koncar I, Lindholt J, de Ceniga MV, Vermassen F, Verzini F, Document Reviewers, De Maeseneer MG, Blomgren L, Hartung O, Kalodiki E, Korten E, Lugli M, Naylor R, Nicolini P, Rosales A. Editor’s choice — management of  chronic venous disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2015;49(6):678-737.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.02.007
  14. Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014; 7:CD005624. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005624.pub3
  15. Paravastu S, Horne M, Dodd P. Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;11(11):CD010878. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010878.pub2
  16. Hartmann K. Endovenöse (minimalinvasive) Verfahren zur Therapie der Varikose: Schonende und effektive Alternative zur Stripping-Operation [Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins: The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations]. Hautarzt. 2020;71(1):12-19. (In German). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-019-04520-2
  17. Davies H, Popplewell M, Darvall K, Bate G, Bradbury A. A review of randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with endothermal ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2015;31(4):234-240.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355515595194
  18. Vos C, Ünlü Ç, Bosma J, van Vlijmen C, de Nie A, Schreve M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of two novel techniques of nonthermal endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2017;5(6):880-896.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.05.022
  19. Tang T, Rathnaweera H, Kam J, Chong T, Choke E, Tan Y. Endovenous Cyanoacrylate Glue to Treat Varicose Veins and Chronic Venous Insufficiency-Experience Gained From Our First 100+ Truncal Venous Ablations in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population Using the Medtronic VenaSeal Closure System. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2019;7(5):764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.06.007
  20. Linfante I, Wakhloo A. Brain Aneurysms and Arteriovenous Malformations. Stroke. 2007;38(4):1411-1417. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000259824.10732.bb
  21. Labenz J, Borsch G. Bleeding gastric and duodenal varicose veins: endoscopic embolisation using tissue adhesives. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1992;117: 1274-1277.
  22. Vanlangenhove P, De Keukeleire K, Everaert K, Van Maele G, Defreyne L. Efficacy and Safety of Two Different n-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylates for the Embolization of Varicoceles: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;35(3):598-606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-011-0188-9
  23. Almeida J, Min R, Raabe R, McLean D, Madsen M. Cyanoacrylate adhesive for the closure of truncal veins: 60-day swine model results. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(7):631-635.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574411413938
  24. Lam Y, De Maeseneer M, Lawson J, De Borst G, Boersma D. Expert review on the VenaSeal system for endovenous cyano-acrylate adhesive ablation of incompetent saphenous trunks in patients with varicose veins. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(10):755-762.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2017.1378093
  25. Sannikov AB, Emelyanenko VM. Cyanoacrylate Glue Compositions in Phlebology. Flebologiya. 2019;13(1):36-41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo20191301136
  26. Nadvikov AI, Fokin AA, Gasnikov AV, Chernousov VV, Khisamutdinov DA. Vakuum assistirovannaya kleevaya obliteratsiya ven pri varikoznoj bolezni nizhnikh konechnostej. Patent RF na izobretenie №RU 2 720 742 C2/13.05.2020. Accessed August 16, 2021. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_43894652_58971230.PDF
  27. Shaydakov EV, Meltsova AZh, Porembskaya OYa, Kudinova EA, Korzhevsky DE, Kirik OV, Sukhorukova EG. Opyt primeneniya tsianoakrilatnogo kleya pri endovaskulyarnom lechenii varikoznoj bolezni. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2017;23(4):62-67. (In Russ.).
  28. Sannikov AB, Shaydakov EV, Emelyanenko VM, Drozdova IV, Demidenko YaA. O vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya kleevoj kompozitsii «Sul’fakrilat» dlya obliteratsii varikozno izmenennykh ven nizhnikh konechnostej. Novosti Khirurgii. 2020;28(3):258-267. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2020.3.258
  29. Almeida J, Javier J, Mackay E, Bautista C, Proebstle T. First human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2013;1(2):174-180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2012.09.010
  30. Almeida J, Javier J, Mackay E, Bautista C, Cher D, Proebstle T. Two-year follow-up of first human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2014;30(6):397-404.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514532455
  31. Proebstle T, Alm J, Dimitri S, Rasmussen L, Whiteley M, Lawson J, Cher D, Davies A. The European multicenter cohort study on cyanoacrylate embolization of refluxing great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2015;3(1):2-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.09.001
  32. Proebstle T, Alm J, Dimitri S, Rasmussen L, Whiteley M, Lawson J, Davies AH. Three-year follow-up results of the prospective European Multicenter Cohort Study on Cyanoacrylate Embolization for treatment of refluxing great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2021;9(2):329-334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.05.019
  33. Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, Goldman M, King T, Weiss R, Cher D, Jones A. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(4):985-994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.071
  34. Morrison N, Gibson K, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Cher D, Madsen M, Jones A. VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2017;5(3):321-330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.12.005
  35. Gibson K, Morrison N, Kolluri R, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Cher D, Madsen M, Jones A. Twenty-four month results from a randomized trial of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2018;6(5):606-613.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.04.009
  36. Morrison N, Kolluri R, Vasquez M, Madsen M, Jones A, Gibson K. Comparison of cyanoacrylate closure and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins: 36-Month outcomes of the VeClose randomized controlled trial. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2018;34(6):380-390.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355518810259
  37. Morrison N, Gibson K, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Jones A. Five-year extension study of patients from a randomized clinical trial (VeClose) comparing cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2020;8(6):978-989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.080
  38. Gibson K, Ferris B. Cyanoacrylate closure of incompetent great, small and accessory saphenous veins without the use of post-procedure compression: Initial outcomes of a post-market evaluation of the VenaSeal System (the WAVES Study). Vascular. 2016;25(2):149-156.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1708538116651014
  39. Dimech A, Cassar K. Efficacy of Cyanoacrylate Glue Ablation of Primary Truncal Varicose Veins Compared to Existing Endovenous Techniques: A Systematic Review of the Literature. The Surgery Journal. 2020;06(02):77-86.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708866
  40. Siribumrungwong B, Wilasrusmee C, Orrapin S, Srikuea K, Benyakorn T, McKay G, Attia J, Rerkasem K, Thakkinstian A. Interventions for great saphenous vein reflux: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. British Journal of Surgery. 2021;108(3):244-255.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaa101
  41. Kolluri R, Chung J, Kim S, Nath N, Bhalla BB, Jain T, Zygmunt J, Davies A. Network meta-analysis to compare VenaSeal with other superficial venous therapies for chronic venous insufficiency. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2020;8(3):472-481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.061
  42. Cho S, Joh J. Cyanoacrylate Closure of Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency. Dermatologic Surgery. 2021;47(3):381-384.  https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000002748
  43. Eroglu E, Yasim A. A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate, Radiofrequency Ablation and Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Superficial Venous Incompetence: Two Year Follow up Results. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(5):1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.007
  44. Toonder I, Lam Y, Lawson J, Wittens C. Cyanoacrylate adhesive perforator embolization (CAPE) of incompetent perforating veins of the leg, a feasibility study. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2014;29(1 Suppl):49-54.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355514529696
  45. Prasad Bp K, Joy B, Toms A, Sleeba T. Treatment of Incompetent Perforators in Recurrent Venous Insufficiency With Adhesive Embolization and Sclerotherapy. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2018;6(6):804.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.09.008
  46. Murzina EL, Lobastov KV, Bargandzhiya AB, Laberko LA, Popov IB. Mid-Term Results of Cyanoacrylate Embolization of Saphenous Veins. Flebologiya. 2020;14(4):311-321. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014041311
  47. García-Carpintero E, Carmona M, Chalco-Orrego J, González-Enríquez J, Imaz-Iglesia I. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovenous cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation for incompetent saphenous veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders. 2020;8(2):287-296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.09.010
  48. Bellam Premnath K, Joy B, Raghavendra V, Toms A, Sleeba T. Cyanoacrylate adhesive embolization and sclerotherapy for primary varicose veins. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2017;33(8):547-557.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355517733339
  49. Whiteley M. Glue, steam and Clarivein — Best practice techniques and evidence. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2015;30(2 Suppl):24-28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355515591447
  50. Park I. Successful use of VenaSeal system for the treatment of large great saphenous vein of 2.84-cm diameter. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018;94(4):219.  https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.4.219
  51. Shirinbek O, Odinokova SN. Klinicheskij sluchaj uspeshnoj kleevoj obliteratsii kul’ti bol’shoj podkozhnoj veny posle retsidiva varikoznoj bolezni. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2021;27(2 Suppl):877-879. (In Russ.).
  52. Langridge B, Onida S, Weir J, Moore H, Lane T, Davies A. Cyanoacrylate glue embolisation for varicose veins — A novel complication. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2020;35(7):520-523.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355520901662
  53. Parsi K, Roberts S, Kang M, Benson S, Baker L, Berman I, Bester LJ, Connor DE, Dinnen P, Grace J, Stirling A, Ibrahim N, Lekich C, Lim A, Matar L, Nadkarni S, Paraskevas P, Rogan C, Thibault PK, Thibault S, van Rij A, Yang A. Cyanoacrylate closure for peripheral veins: Consensus document of the Australasian College of Phlebology. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2019;35(3):153-175.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355519864755
  54. Guo J, Zhang F, Guo J, Guo L, Gu Y, Huang Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of cyanoacrylate ablation over endovenous thermal ablation for treating incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2021;36(8):597-608.  https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555211008762
  55. Juneja A, Jain S, Silpe J, Landis G, Mussa F, Etkin Y. Scoping review of non-thermal technologies for endovenous ablation for treatment of venous insufficiency. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2021;62(5):413-419.  https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.21.11900-7
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.