The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Baranov A.V.

Federal'nyĭ nauchno-klinicheskiĭ tsentr spetsializirovannykh vidov meditsinskoĭ pomoshchi i meditsinskikh tekhnologiĭ FMBA Rossii;
klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #119 FMBA Rossii, laboratoriia minimal'no invazivnoĭ khirurgii NIMSI MGMSU, Moskva

Biktimirov R.G.

Federal'nyĭ nauchno-klinicheskiĭ tsentr spetsializirovannykh vidov meditsinskoĭ pomoshchi i meditsinskikh tekhnologiĭ FMBA Rossii;
klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #119 FMBA Rossii, laboratoriia minimal'no invazivnoĭ khirurgii NIMSI MGMSU, Moskva

Parkhonin D.I.

Federal'nyĭ nauchno-klinicheskiĭ tsentr spetsializirovannykh vidov meditsinskoĭ pomoshchi i meditsinskikh tekhnologiĭ FMBA Rossii;
klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #119 FMBA Rossii, laboratoriia minimal'no invazivnoĭ khirurgii NIMSI MGMSU, Moskva

Zabolotnov K.Iu.

Federal'nyĭ nauchno-klinicheskiĭ tsentr spetsializirovannykh vidov meditsinskoĭ pomoshchi i meditsinskikh tekhnologiĭ FMBA Rossii;
klinicheskaia bol'nitsa #119 FMBA Rossii, laboratoriia minimal'no invazivnoĭ khirurgii NIMSI MGMSU, Moskva

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic obstruction: our experience

Authors:

Baranov A.V., Biktimirov R.G., Parkhonin D.I., Zabolotnov K.Iu.

More about the authors

Journal: Endoscopic Surgery. 2012;18(1): 9‑11

Read: 1211 times


To cite this article:

Baranov AV, Biktimirov RG, Parkhonin DI, Zabolotnov KIu. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic obstruction: our experience. Endoscopic Surgery. 2012;18(1):9‑11. (In Russ.)

Recommended articles:
Surgical treatment of thoracic esophageal dive­rticula (clinical series). Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(4):89-94
Lapa­roscopic inte­rventions in urgent surgery (literature review). Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(2):94-101
Urogenital endo­metriosis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):61-67
Posthysterectomy syndrome. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(3):34-40

References:

  1. Inagaki T., Rha K.H., Ong A.M. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 2005; 95: Suppl 2: 102-105.
  2. Persky L., Krause J.R., Boltuch R.L. Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1977; 118: 162-165.
  3. O'Reilly P.H., Brooman P.J., Mak S. et al. The long term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2002; 87: 287-289.
  4. Wickham J.E., Kellet M.J. Percutaneous pyelolysis. Eur Urol 1983; 9: 122-124.
  5. Adeyoju A.B., Hrouda D., Gill I.S. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first decade. BJU Intern 2004; 94: 264-267.
  6. Motola J.A., Badlani G.H., Smith A.D. Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8-year followup. J Urol 1993; 149: 453-456.
  7. Nadler R.B., Rao G.S., Pearle M.S. et al. Acucise endopyelotomy: assessment of long-term durability. J Urol 1996; 156: 1094-1097.
  8. Türk I.A., Davis J.W., Winkelmann B. et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty - the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002; 42: 268-275.
  9. Schuessler W.W., Grune M.T., Tecuanhuey L.V., Preminger G.M. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-1799.
  10. Bauer J.J., Bishoff J.T., Moore R.G. et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 1999; 162: 692-695.
  11. Kaouk J.H., Kuang W., Gill I.S. Laparoscopic dismembered tabularized flap pyeloplasty:a novel technique. J Urol 2002; 167: 229.
  12. Nakada S.Y., McDougall E.M., Clayman R.V. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty of secondary UPJ obstruction. Urology 1995; 46: 257.
  13. Nicol D.I., Smithers D.M. Laparoscopic approach to the left kidney avoiding colonic mobilization. J Urol 1994; 152: 1967.
  14. Notley R.G., Beaugie J.M. The long term follow-up of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis. Br J Urol 1973; 45: 464.
  15. Brooks J.D., Kavoussi L.R., Preminger G.M. et al. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995; 46: 791-795.
  16. Rodrigues H., Rodrigues P., Ruela M. et al. Dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty with antegrade placement of ureteral stent: simplification of the technique. Int Braz J Urol 2002; 28: 439-444.
  17. Janetschek G., Peschel R., Frauscher F. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 695-704.
  18. Rassweiler J.J., Seemann O., Frede T. et al. Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J Urol 1998; 160: 1265-1269.
  19. Jarret T.W., Fabrizio M.D., Lamont D.J. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: five-year experience. J Urol 1999; 161: 24: Suppl: 79.
  20. Soulié M., Salomon L., Patard J.J. et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001; 166: 48-50.
  21. Sundaram C.P., Grubb R.L. 3rd, Rehman J. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2003; 169: 2037-2040.
  22. Mandhani A., Kumar D., Kumar A. et al. Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis. J Endourol 2005; 19: 797-802.
  23. Moon D.A., El-Shazly M.A., Chang C.M. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006; 67: 932-936.
  24. Rassweiler J.J., Teber D., Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 2008; 26: 539-547.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.