ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
External validation of the ETVSS scale for predicting the outcomes after third ventriculostomy in children less than one year of age with obstructive hydrocephalus

External validation of the ETVSS scale for predicting the outcomes after third ventriculostomy in children less than one year of age with obstructive hydrocephalus

Authors:
Данилин В.Е.,
Летягин Г.В.,
Пашков А.А.,
Ким С.А.,
Щербаков А.В.,
Сысоева А.А.

Журнал: Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. 2025;89(5):45-53.

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20258905145

Read: 1426 раз

Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. S

Uccessful endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) depends on patient characteristics, including age, etiology of hydrocephalus and previous shunting. Kulkarni et al. [1] developed the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score (ETVSS) to predict the success of ETV using these factors. We analyzed own experience of ETV in children under one year of age and validity of the ETVSS scale.

OBJECTIVE

To assess prognostic significance of the ETVSS scale in children under one year of age after ETV.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 1105 surgeries in children with hydrocephalus between 2012 and 2021 including 273 ETV procedures. Primary ETV was performed in 129 patients (47.3% of all procedures), they met the inclusion criteria. ETVSS score was calculated retrospectively for each patient and compared with actual success of ETV. ROC analysis was used to determine the quality of the validated version of the ETVSS scale.

RESULTS

The study included 129 primary ETVs in children under one year of age. Success rate was 52.7% (n=68), the minimum follow-up — 6 months. When analyzing the results, we found mild prognostic underestimation in short-term and long-term outcomes of ETV according to the ETVSS scale. ROC analysis revealed AUC 0.67 that corresponds to satisfactory level of this classification. Sensitivity was 66%, specificity — 63%.

CONCLUSION

ETVSS scale demonstrated good ability to predict success according to actual success rate of ETV in neonates and infants. This tool may be useful in decision-making for endoscopic surgery. The ETVSS scale should be used by neurosurgeons to assess possible outcomes after ETV in infants.

Keywords

  • occlusive hydrocephalus
  • congenital hydrocephalus
  • posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus
  • neonates
  • infancy
  • ventriculocisternostomy
  • ventriculoperitoneal shunting
  • ETVSS

Дата поступления: 23.01.2025

Дата принятия в печать: 18.07.2025

Дата публикации: 16.10.2025

References
  1. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Kestle JR, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Constantini S; Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group. Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2010;6(4):310-315. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.8.PEDS103
  2. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Roth J, Constantini S; Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2009;155(2):254-259.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.02.048
  3. Durnford AJ, Kirkham FJ, Mathad N, Sparrow OC. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus: validation of a success score that predicts long-term outcome. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2011;8(5):489-493. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.8.PEDS1166
  4. Naftel RP, Reed GT, Kulkarni AV, Wellons JC. Evaluating the Children’s Hospital of Alabama endoscopic third ventriculostomy experience using the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score: an external validation study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2011;8(5):494-501. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.8.PEDS1145
  5. Breimer GE, Sival DA, Brusse-Keizer MG, Hoving EW. An external validation of the ETVSS for both short-term and long-term predictive adequacy in 104 pediatric patients. Child’s Nervous System. 2013;29(8):1305-1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2122-8
  6. Labidi M, Lavoie P, Lapointe G, Obaid S, Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Turmel A. Predicting success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: validation of the ETV Success Score in a mixed population of adult and pediatric patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015;123(6):1447-1455. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS141240
  7. Foley RW, Ndoro S, Crimmins D, Caird J. Is the endoscopic third ventriculostomy success score an appropriate tool to inform clinical decision-making? British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;31(3):314-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2016.1229744
  8. Furtado LMF, da Costa Val Filho JA, Dos Santos Júnior EC. External validation of the ETV success score in 313 pediatric patients: a Brazilian single-center study. Neurosurgical Review. 2021;44(5):2727-2734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01461-6
  9. Verhey LH, Kulkarni AV, Reeder RW, Riva-Cambrin J, Jensen H, Pollack IF, Rocque BG, Tamber MS, McDonald PJ, Krieger MD, Pindrik JA, Hauptman JS, Browd SR, Whitehead WE, Jackson EM, Wellons JC, Hankinson TC, Chu J, Limbrick DD, Strahle JM, Kestle JRW; Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network. A re-evaluation of the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score: a Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2024;33(5):417-427. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.12.PEDS23401
  10. Krause M, Gräfe D, Metzger R, Griessenauer CJ, Gburek-Augustat J. Evaluation of the ETV success score and its predictive value in pediatric occlusive hydrocephalus: implications for patient counseling. Child’s Nervous System. 2024;41(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06728-7
  11. Albalkhi I, Garatli S, Helal B, Saleh T, AlRamadan AH, Warf BC. Morbidity and etiology-based success rate of combined endoscopic ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1918 infants. Neurosurgical Review. 2023;46(1):180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02091-4
  12. Issa M, Younsi A, Paggetti F, Miotk N, Seitz A, Bendszus M, Wisoff JH, Unterberg A, El Damaty A. Heidelberg ETV score to assess success of ETV in patients with occlusive hydrocephalus: a retrospective single-center study. Neurosurgical Review. 2023;46(1):214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02122-0
  13. Ang J, Chua FHZ, Devi S, Low DCY, Seow WT, Low SYY. Evaluation of the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score for Pediatric Hydrocephalus: Experience from a Singapore Children’s Hospital. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2025:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000546994
  14. Krejcí T, Kubina L, Krejcí O, Chlachula M, Lipina R. Success Rate of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Children Younger Than 1 Year With Idiopathic Congenital Aqueductal Stenosis and Long-term Follow-up. Journal of Child Neurology. 2025;40(2):77-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738241282356
  15. Costa Val JA, Scaldaferri PM, Furtado LM, de Souza Baptista G. Third ventriculostomy in infants younger than 1 year old. Child’s Nervous System. 2012;28(8):1233-1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1740-x
  16. Galstyan AG, Melikyan AG, Korshunov AK, Arutyunov NV. Endoscopic ventriculostomy of the third ventricle in infants of less than 2 years of age. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2008;1:11-17. (In Russ.).
  17. Sufianov AA, Sufianova GZ, Iakimov IA. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients younger than 2 years: outcome analysis of 41 hydrocephalus cases. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2010;5(4):392-401. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.11.PEDS09197
  18. Kulkarni AV, Sgouros S, Constantini S; IIHS Investigators. International Infant Hydrocephalus Study: initial results of a prospective, multicenter comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and shunt for infant hydrocephalus. Child’s Nervous System. 2016;32(6):1039-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3095-1
  19. Danilin VE, Letyagin GV, Kim SA, Sysoeva AA, Amelina EV. Factors of endoscopic third ventriculostomy efficacy in infants with obstructive hydrocephalus under one year of age. Burdenko’s Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018;82(6):59-67. (In Russ., In Engl.). https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20188206159
  20. Constantini S, Sgouros S, Kulkarni A. Neuroendoscopy in the youngest age group. World Neurosurgery. 2013;79(2):S23.e1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.02.003
slide-cover
slide-cover
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Laparoscopic assistance for peritoneal catheter positioning in adults scheduled for ventriculoperitoneal shunting at the Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University.Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2026;90(4):21-29

Predictors of outcomes after intensive care for congenital malformations in early neonatal period.Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2026;(3):35-42

Predictors of mortality in neonatal spontaneous gastric perforation: a multiple-center study.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(9):44-53

Intracardiac migration of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. A systematic literature review and case report.Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2024;88(6):88-96

Surgical treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in neonates and infants.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(11):46-53

Intrascopic predictors of favorable outcomes after ventriculoperitoneal shunting in Hakim—Adams syndrome: a single-center retrospective non-randomized study.Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2024;88(5):60-68

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12
  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru
  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026