Nerve fiber structure after different types of corneal transplantation

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Outcomes of hemi-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and phacoemulsification for the treatment of primary Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy combined with cataract. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(1):36-44

Intracorneal selective stromal transplantation. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(1):86-92

Comparative assessment of the state of the cornea after YAG-laser interventions on anterior segment structures. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):17-25

Options for contact correction after keratoplasty. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):98-103

Functional outcomes and corneal condition in cavitation complications of femtosecond LASIK. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):78-86

Study of the effectiveness of different methods of external psoriasis therapy in a new experimental model of chronic inflammation. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2024;(5):552-557

This review presents basic information about the state of corneal nerve fibers and Langerhans cells before and after keratoplasty. Keratoplasty is a common corneal surgery that carries a risk of graft rejection. The state of corneal nerve fibers can vary after different types of keratoplasty. Corneal confocal microscopy allows in vivo evaluation of the cornea, which can help assess the condition of corneal nerve fibers, as well as reveal the presence of Langerhans cells. Further research in this direction would contribute to identifying the relationship between the state of corneal nerve fibers, the presence of Langerhans cells, and graft rejection.

Keywords:

corneal nerve fibers

keratoplasty

corneal transplantation

corneal confocal microscopy

Langerhans cells

Authors:

Surnina Z.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

ORCID: 0000-0001-5692-1800

Andreev A.Yu.

Research Institute of Eye Disease;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

SPIN RSCI: 6410-7993
Scopus AuthorID: 57223096009
ResearcherID: G-2411-2017
ORCID: 0000-0002-0267-9040

Sharnina D.A.

Research Institute of Eye Disease

ORCID: 0000-0002-7971-8730

Yusef S.N.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Disease

ORCID: 0000-0003-0486-7819

Received:

23.05.2022

Accepted:

04.06.2022

List of references:

Medeiros CS, Santhiago MR. Corneal nerves anatomy, function, injury and regeneration. Experimental Eye Research. 2020;200:108243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2020.108243
Al-Aqaba MA, Dhillon VK, Mohammed I, Said DG, Dua HS. Corneal nerves in health and disease. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2019; 73:100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.05.003
Meek KM, Knupp C. Corneal structure and transparency. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2015;49:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.07.001
Cruzat A, Qazi Y, Hamrah P. In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease. The Ocular Surface. 2017;15(1):15-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2016.09.004
Müller LJ, Marfurt CF, Kruse F, Tervo TM. Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. Experimental Eye Research. 2003;76(5):521-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00050-2
Alzubaidi R, Sharif MS, Qahwaji R, Ipson S, Brahma A. In vivo confocal microscopic corneal images in health and disease with an emphasis on extracting features and visual signatures for corneal diseases: a review study. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016;100(1):41-55. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306934
Labetoulle M, Baudouin C, Calonge M, Merayo-Lloves J, Boboridis KG, Akova YA, Aragona P, Geerling G, Messmer EM, Benítez-Del-Castillo J. Role of corneal nerves in ocular surface homeostasis and disease. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2019;97(2):137-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13844
Hamrah P, Huq SO, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Dana MR. Corneal immunity is mediated by heterogeneous population of antigen-presenting cells. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2003;74(2):172-178. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1102544
Zhivov A, Stave J, Vollmar B, Guthoff R. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of Langerhans cell density and distribution in the normal human corneal epithelium. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2005;243(10):1056-1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1075-8
Hamrah P, Dana MR. Corneal antigen-presenting cells. Chemical Immunology and Allergy. 2007;92:58-70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000099254
Mandathara PS, Stapleton FJ, Kokkinakis J, Willcox MDP. A pilot study on corneal Langerhans cells in keratoconus. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2018;41(2):219-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.10.005
Singh R, Gupta N, Vanathi M, Tandon R. Corneal transplantation in the modern era. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2019;150(1):7-22. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_141_19
Tan DT, Dart JK, Holland EJ, Kinoshita S. Corneal transplantation. The Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1749-1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60437-1
Budnikova EA, Trufanov SV, Rozinova VN Penetrating keratoplasty with a mushroom-shaped operative incision (literature review). Tochka zreniya. Vostok-Zapad. 2020;1:84-87. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25276/2410-1257-2020-1-84-87
Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2002;28(3):398-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01181-6
Osipian GA. Options for keratoconus treatment. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2011; 3:55-58. (In Russ.).
Noble BA, Agrawal A, Collins C, Saldana M, Brogden PR, Zuberbuhler B. Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK): visual outcome and complications for a heterogeneous group of corneal pathologies. Cornea. 2007;26(1): 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000240080.99832.f3
Kymionis GD, Mikropoulos DG, Portaliou DM, Boboridis KG, Voudouragkaki IC, Dragoumis ND, Konstas AG. New perspectives on lamellar keratoplasty. Advances in Therapy. 2014;31(5):494-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-014-0121-0
Trufanov SV, Zajcev AV, Salavarova EP, Semchenko KN, Budnikova EA. Modern approaches to the surgical treatment of bullous keratopathy. Tochka zreniya. Vostok-Zapad. 2019;1:78-81. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25276/2410-1257-2019-1-78-81
Dupps WJ Jr, Qian Y, Meisler DM. Multivariate model of refractive shift in Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2008;34(4):578-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.045
Arenas E, Esquenazi S, Anwar M, Terry M. Lamellar corneal transplantation. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2012;57(6):510-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.01.009
Maliugin BÉ, Shilova NF, Anisimova NS, Antonova OP. Transplantation of endothelium and Descemet’s membrane. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2019;135(1): 98-103. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913501198
Röck T, Landenberger J, Bramkamp M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Röck D. The Evolution of Corneal Transplantation. Annals of Transplantation. 2017;22: 749-754. https://doi.org/10.12659/aot.905498
Avetisov SÉ, Mamikonian VR, Trufanov SV, Osipian GA. Selective principle of modern approaches in keratoplasty. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2013;129(5): 97-103. (In Russ.).
Hos D, Matthaei M, Bock F, Maruyama K, Notara M, Clahsen T, Hou Y, Le VNH, Salabarria AC, Horstmann J, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C. Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2019;73:100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001
Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GR. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK — the thinner the better? Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2009; 20(4):299-307. https://doi.org./10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832b8d18
Niederer RL, McGhee CN. Clinical in vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea in health and disease. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2010;29(1):30-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.11.001
Patel DV, McGhee CN. In vivo confocal microscopy of human corneal nerves in health, in ocular and systemic disease, and following corneal surgery: a review. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;93(7):853-860. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.150615
Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T, McGhee CN. Corneal innervation and cellular changes after corneal transplantation: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48(2):621-626. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0538
Hollingsworth JG, Efron N, Tullo AB. A longitudinal case series investigating cellular changes to the transplanted cornea using confocal microscopy. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2006;29(3):135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2006.03.005
Darwish T, Brahma A, O’Donnell C, Efron N. Subbasal nerve fiber regeneration after LASIK and LASEK assessed by noncontact esthesiometry and in vivo confocal microscopy: prospective study. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2007;33(9):1515-1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.023
Richter A, Slowik C, Somodi S, Vick HP, Guthoff R. Corneal reinnervation following penetrating keratoplasty — correlation of esthesiometry and confocal microscopy. German Journal of Ophthalmology. 1996;5(6):513-517.
Ceccuzzi R, Zanardi A, Fiorentino A, Tinelli C, Bianchi PE. Corneal sensitivity in keratoconus after penetrating and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(4):247-250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277615
Bucher F, Hos D, Matthaei M, Steven P, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM. Corneal nerve alterations after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: an in vivo confocal microscopy study. Cornea. 2014;33(11):1134-1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000250
Wang D, Song P, Wang S, Sun D, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Gao H. Laser Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Clear Grafts after Penetrating Keratoplasty. BioMed Research International. 2016;2016:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5159746

Close metadata