The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kalyuta T.Yu.

V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University

Fedonnikov A.S.

V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University

Assessment of the quality of medical care for patients who underwent myocardial revascularization in the Russian Federation: the patient, the physician, and the healthcare organizer views

Authors:

Kalyuta T.Yu., Fedonnikov A.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;27(12): 44‑50

Read: 1373 times


To cite this article:

Kalyuta TYu, Fedonnikov AS. Assessment of the quality of medical care for patients who underwent myocardial revascularization in the Russian Federation: the patient, the physician, and the healthcare organizer views. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;27(12):44‑50. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20242712144

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Pandit AP, Basheer S, Makhijani A. Institute for Healthcare Communication. Impact of communication in healthcare. International Education and Research Journal. 2017;3(8):127-129. Accessed March 16, 2024. https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/1307/1315
  2. Marzban S, Najafi M, Agolli A, Ashrafi E. Impact of Patient Engagement on Healthcare Quality: A Scoping Review. Journal of Patient Experience. 2022;9:23743735221125439. https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221125439
  3. McDonald AA. Long and Winding Road: Improving Communication with Patients in the NHS. External Link. 2016. Accessed March 16, 2024. https://goo.su/IqXq5
  4. Using PREMs data for quality improvement. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Published May 26, 2022. Accessed May 26, 2024. https://goo.su/fmz4czQ
  5. Argunova YA. Sovershenstvovanie podxodov k perioperacionnomu vedeniyu pacientov s koronarny`m shuntirovaniem. E`ffekty` preabilitacii: Dis. … d-ra med. nauk. Kemerovo, 2022. Accessed November 06, 2024. (In Russ.). https://www.dissercat.com/content/covershenstvovanie-podkhodov-k-perioperatsionnomu-vedeniyu-patsientov-s-koronarnym-shuntirov
  6. Nazarov AM, Tolpygina SN, Kicha DI, et al. Big data analysis on medical services in coronary heart disease for outpatient care quality management and assessment of the risk of the adverse outcomes. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2021;24(11):21-27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20212411121
  7. Nazarov AM, Kicha DI, Goloshchapov-Aksenov RS. Economic efficiency of information management technology for the quality of dispensary observation in patients with coronary artery disease of the last access. Zdravoohranenie Rossijskoj Federacii. 2024;68(1):5-10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197X-2024-68-1-5-10
  8. Dil SV, Demyanov SV, Ryabov VV, et al. Indicators of quality of care and changes in clinical characteristics of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in a regional vascular center during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kardiovaskuljarnaja terapija i profilaktika. 2022;21(2):2984. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-20222984
  9. Kuzmichkina MA, Serebryakova VN. Aspects of economic efficiency of surgical myocardial revascularization. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2021;24(3):100—104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed202124031100
  10. Ivanova AE, Golovenkin SE, Sul’din SA. Preventable health loss associated with myocardial infarction. Socialnye aspekty zdorovya naseleniya. E`lektronny`j nauchny`j zhurnal. 2013;5(33). Accessed November 06, 2024. (In Russ.). https://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/504
  11. Ivashchenko AS, Ezhov VV, Severin NA, et al. The effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in coronary heart disease as a part of the spa resort treatment.. Evrazijskij kardiologicheskij zhurnal. 2017;(2):28-32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38109/2225-1685-2017-2-28-32
  12. Bokeriya LA, Stupakov IN, Samorodskaya IV, et al. The possibilities of information systems in assessing the impact of clinical factors on the costs of medical institutions. Byulleten’ NCSSKH im. A.N. Bakuleva RAMN. Serdechno-sosudistye zabolevaniya. 2007;8(S6):330. (In Russ.).
  13. Yang M, Huang YT, Hu XW, et al. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation care after coronary intervention on cardiac function recovery and negative mood in patients with myocardial infarction. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2024; 12(1):59-67.  https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.59
  14. Belova SA. Nauchnoe obosnovanie sovershenstvovaniya organizacii medicinskoj pomoshhi pri ishemicheskoj bolezni serdcza na regional`nom urovne (na primere Chelyabinskoj obl.): Dis. … kand. med. nauk. M., 2015. https://www.dissercat.com/content/nauchnoe-obosnovanie-sovershenstvovaniya-organizatsii-meditsinskoi-pomoshchi-pri-ishemichesk
  15. Drapkina OM, Novikova NK, Dzhioyeva ON. Methodological recommendations: «Current opportunities and prospects of complex physical activity of patients with cardiovascular pathology». Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020;23(3-2):61119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20202303261
  16. Zholdasbekova AS, Kalmataeva ZA. Evaluation of patients’ awareness level after myocardial revascularization in ischemic heart disease through the undergo rehabilitation issues in outpatient-and-polyclinic organizations. Vestnik Kazaxskogo nacional`nogo medicinskogo universiteta. 2015(2):617-619. (In Russ.).
  17. Nazarov AM, Kicha DI, Goloshhapov-Aksenov RS, et al. Information quality management of ambulatory outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Kompleksny`e problemy` serdechno-sosudisty`x zabolevanij. 2022;11(S4): 116-124. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4S-116-124
  18. Makhni EC, Hennekes ME. The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice and Clinical Decision Making. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2023;31(20):1059-1066. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00040
  19. Kalinina AM, Sokolov GE, Gornyj BE, Drapkina OM. Assessment of the quality of medical examinations as an organizational technology of medical prevention in primary health care: focus on cardiovascular diseases. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2021;24(1):26-34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20212401126
  20. Usova EI, Ionov MV, Alieva AS, et al. Integrated solution for patients of a very high cardiovascular risk. Final results. Rossijskij kardiologicheskij zhurnal. 2023;28(2):5358. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5358
  21. Martsevich SY, Zharkova ED, Kutishenko NP, et al. An Attempt to Accord the Quality of Therapy of Stable Coronary Heart Disease Patients with Current Clinical Guidelines (ALIGN study): Design and the First Results. Racional’naja Farmakoterapija v Kardiologii. 2020;16(1):75-81. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20996/1819-6446-2020-02-08
  22. Drapkina OM, Shepel' RN, Kalinina AM, et al. Organizational context of quality assessment of follow-up care for patients with stable coronary heart disease by primary care general practitioners. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2021;24(9):6-16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed2021240916
  23. Ergeshov MB. Socio-economic efficiency of teaching patients with coronary heart disease. Evrazijskij kardiologicheskij zhurnal. 2019(S2):193. (In Russ.).
  24. Kabargina AI, Lopatin YM. Self-care and quality of life in comorbid patients with chronic coronary syndromes: is there any correlation? Yuzhno-Rossijskij zhurnal terapevticheskoj praktiki. 2021;2(3):40-47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21886/2712-8156-2021-2-3-40-47
  25. Pogosova NV, Oganov RG, Bojcov SA, et al. Psychosocial factors and life quality in coronary heart disease patients: results of the russian part of international multicenter study EUROASPIRE IV. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika. 2017;16(5):20-26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15829/1728-8800-2017-5-20-26
  26. Zagoryanskaya OY, Malikov VE. Conducting clinical and psychological research in cardiac surgery patients according to the program exploratory scientific research. Byulleten’ NCSSKH im. A.N. Bakuleva RAMN. Serdechno-sosudistye zabolevaniya. 2015;16(S6):240. (In Russ.).
  27. Kuz’michkina MA, Serebryakova VN. Causes affecting the working capacity of patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery (systematic review). Zdravoohranenie Rossijskoj Federacii. 2021;65(6):581-586. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197X-2021-65-6-581-586
  28. Razumnikova OM, Tarasova IV, Trubnikova OA, et al. Clustering of indicators of the cognitive status in cardiac surgery patients to assess the risk of postoperative decline. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2022;7(1):129-138. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29413/ABS.2022-7.1.15
  29. Averin EE, Lopatin YM, Delaryu VV. Rehabilitation of cardiac surgery patients in Russia: medical, social, psychological and legal aspects. Zhurnal Serdechnaya nedostatochnost’. 2012;13(1-69):40-45. (In Russ.).
  30. Velikanov AA, Stolyarova AA, Protasov EA, et al. Dynamics of psychoemotional characteristics in patients with coronary heart disease after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Russian sampling specifics. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Psihologiya i pedagogika. 2020;17(2): 310-329. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-2-310-329
  31. Bugurov SV. Ocenka e`ffektivnosti i bezopasnosti revaskulyarizacii sonny`x arterij stentami s «otkry`toj» i «zakry`toj» yachejkami v randomizirovannom klinicheskom issledovanii «SIBIR`». Dis. … kand. med. nauk. Novosibirsk, 2022. Accessed November 06, 2024. (In Russ.). https://www.dissercat.com/content/otsenka-effektivnosti-i-bezopasnosti-revaskulyarizatsii-sonnykh-arterii-stentami-s-otkrytoi
  32. Arlekin BG, Boitsov SA, Manoshkina EM, et al. Myocardial revascularization in the Russian Federation in acute coronary syndrome in 2016-2020. Kardiologija. 2021;61(12):4-15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2021.12.n1879
  33. Sagitova GR, Antonova AA, Sereda VM, et al. Assessment of satisfaction with medical care of primary care patients (according to a sociological survey). Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal. 2023;2(128). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2023.128.88
  34. Masterson CR, Spadaccio C, Dimagli A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in cardiovascular trials. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2021;37(9): 1340-1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.04.006
  35. Benson T. Why it is hard to use PROMs and PREMs in routine health and care. BMJ Open Quality. 2023;12(4):e002516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002516
  36. Yu JY, Goldberg T, Lao N, et al. Electronic forms for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an effective, time-efficient, and cost-minimizing alternative to paper forms. Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal. 2021;19(1):67.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-021-00551-z
  37. Drapkina OM, Maslennikova GY, SHepel’ RN. Digital technologies in healthcare: electronic medical carts. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;27(8):7-12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed2024270817

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.