Breast augmentation in patients with congenital genetic and endocrine disorders of sex development
Журнал: Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2026;(2):41-47.
DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202602141
Read: 1319 раз
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To develop an optimal method for augmentation mammoplasty in patients with congenital genetic and endocrine disorders of sex development.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study is devoted to original technique of augmentation mammoplasty. There were 2 groups by 20 patients each with congenital genetic and endocrine disorders of sex development. Age of patients ranged from 20 to 42 years. Patients in the 1st group underwent classical augmentation mammoplasty, in the 2nd group — original breast augmentation. The essence of this technique is to achieve aesthetic and long-term result while minimizing the risk of adverse events determined by the underlying anatomical features. We used original questionnaires to assess treatment outcomes and quality of life after surgery.
RESULTS
All cases demonstrated favorable aesthetic results. Survey revealed higher satisfaction with treatment outcomes and better quality of life in the 2nd group.
CONCLUSION
Original surgery in patients with congenital genetic and endocrine disorders of sex development significantly improved self-perception and psychosocial status.
Keywords
- augmentation mammoplasty
- congenital genetic and endocrine disorders of sex development
- structural features of anterior chest wall in patients with disorders of sex development
Дата поступления: 19.05.2025
Дата принятия в печать: 29.11.2025
Дата публикации: 22.05.2026
- Peterson B, Alajmi H, Ladak A, Samargandi OA. Breast Equalization Augmentation: The Use of Ultrasonic Assisted Liposuction for Correction of Primary Breast Asymmetry with Bilateral Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):667-674. Epub 2021 Aug 30. PMID: 34462800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02528-5
- Coleman E, Radix AE, Bouman WP, Brown GR, de Vries ALC, Deutsch MB, Ettner R, Fraser L, Goodman M, Green J, Hancock AB, Johnson TW, Karasic DH, Knudson GA, Leibowitz SF, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL, Monstrey SJ, Motmans J, Nahata L, Nieder TO, Reisner SL, Richards C, Schechter LS, Tangpricha V, Tishelman AC, Van Trotsenburg MAA, Winter S, Ducheny K, Adams NJ, Adrián TM, Allen LR, Azul D, Bagga H, Başar K, Bathory DS, Belinky JJ, Berg DR, Berli JU, Bluebond-Langner RO, Bouman MB, Bowers ML, Brassard PJ, Byrne J, Capitán L, Cargill CJ, Carswell JM, Chang SC, Chelvakumar G, Corneil T, Dalke KB, De Cuypere G, de Vries E, Den Heijer M, Devor AH, Dhejne C, D’Marco A, Edmiston EK, Edwards-Leeper L, Ehrbar R, Ehrensaft D, Eisfeld J, Elaut E, Erickson-Schroth L, Feldman JL, Fisher AD, Garcia MM, Gijs L, Green SE, Hall BP, Hardy TLD, Irwig MS, Jacobs LA, Janssen AC, Johnson K, Klink DT, Kreukels BPC, Kuper LE, Kvach EJ, Malouf MA, Massey R, Mazur T, McLachlan C, Morrison SD, Mosser SW, Neira PM, Nygren U, Oates JM, Obedin-Maliver J, Pagkalos G, Patton J, Phanuphak N, Rachlin K, Reed T, Rider GN, Ristori J, Robbins-Cherry S, Roberts SA, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Rosenthal SM, Sabir K, Safer JD, Scheim AI, Seal LJ, Sehoole TJ, Spencer K, St Amand C, Steensma TD, Strang JF, Taylor GB, Tilleman K, T’Sjoen GG, Vala LN, Van Mello NM, Veale JF, Vencill JA, Vincent B, Wesp LM, West MA, Arcelus J. Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8. Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Sept 06;23(Suppl 1):S1-S259. PMID: 36238954; PMCID: PMC9553112. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2100644
- Guenette JA, Romer LM, Querido JS, Chua R, Eves ND, Road JD, McKenzie DC, Sheel AW. Sex differences in exercise-induced diaphragmatic fatigue in endurance-trained athletes. Journal of Applied Physiology (1985). 2010 July; 109(1):35-46. Epub 2010 Apr 22. PMID: 20413422. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01341.2009
- Laslocki KA et al. Normal male breast anatomy and histology: Clinical implications. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 2021;65(2): 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13144
- Weissler JM et al. Surgical Outcomes in Transfeminine Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001875
- Coon D, Tuffaha S, Christensen J, Bonawitz SC. Plane Selection in Breast Augmentation: The Role of the Pinch Test. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005678
- Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2009 Jan;33(1):44-48. Epub 2008 Dec 04. PMID: 19052809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y
- Shi H, Cao C, Wang X, et al. Postoperative Pain Analysis in Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02876-w
- Jurat D, Wenzel D. Breast Augmentation in Athletic Women: A Retrospective Survey Assessing Pectoral Muscle Function and Implant Aesthetics Post-Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 June;46(3):1075-1081. Epub 2022 Jan 24. PMID: 35075503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02692-8
- Atiyeh BS, Dibo SA, Nader M, et al. Inframammary Fold Reconstruction in Cosmetic Breast Surgery: A Review of Techniques and Outcomes. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000198
- Campbell CF, Small KH, Adams WP. The Significance of Inframammary Fold (IMF) Fixation in Breast Augmentation: A Novel Approach to IMF Stabilization. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw105
- Nakajima Y, Yoshimura Y, Kami T. Simplified Inframammary Fold Fixation Technique in Breast Augmentation: The ‘Mini-Anchoring’ Method. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery — Global Open. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002345
- Davanzo J et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Study. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjad015
- Swanson E. Prospective Study of Trends in Breast Augmentation: 1,775 Patients over 12 Years. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008321
- Fakin RM, Zimmermann S, Kaye K, et al. The Evolution of Breast Implant Selection: 20-Year Experience with 2,704 Patients. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy103
Recommended articles:
The use of botulinum toxin type A in the conservative treatment of capsular contracture grades II—III according to Baker.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(3):50-55
Breast implant malposition: risk factors, classification, prevention, and surgical treatment.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2-2):94-102
Cost of breast augmentation with silicone implants and subsequent surgeries.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(1):31-39
Fat grafting for breast shaping after implant removal.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2):61-69
Capsular contracture after reconstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;13(6):78-83
Hybrid breast augmentation: the role of lipofilling for optimal results.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4-2):30-36
Autologous fat decantation for transplantation in composite breast augmentation.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4-2):23-29
Subperimetric augmentation mammoplasty: long-term results.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4-2):14-22