
Auricular reconstruction: 3D outcome assessment using photogrammetry
Журнал: Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2026;(2-2):83-93.
DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202602283
Read: 1522 раза
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To develop a smartphone-based three-dimensional photogrammetry protocol for objective quantitative assessment of postoperative symmetry between the reconstructed and contralateral healthy auricle.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Thirty-one patients who underwent unilateral auricular reconstruction with autologous costal cartilage were prospectively enrolled. Photography was performed using standard 12-megapixel smartphone camera without calibration targets or specialized equipment. Textured 3D models were generated using 3DF Zephyr software. Four bilateral parameters were measured: ear and width, auriculocephalic angle, and vertical position relative to lateral canthus. Statistical analysis included mean absolute differences, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals, and paired t-tests (p<0.05).
RESULTS
High-detail 3D models were successfully generated in all 31 cases. On the average, 46.2±2.1 out of 50 photographs were oriented per session (92.4%). Mean absolute bilateral differences were: ear length 0.61 mm, ear width 0.47 mm, auriculocephalic angle 1.51◦, vertical position 1.02 mm. ICCs exceeded 0.91 for all parameters (length: ICC=0.97; width: ICC=0.96; angle: ICC=0.93; vertical position: ICC=0.91).
CONCLUSION
Smartphone-based 3D photogrammetry with 3DF Zephyr is a non-invasive, accessible, and reproducible tool for objective assessment after auricular reconstruction. High measurement accuracy and minimal equipment requirements support its adoption as a standardized quality-control approach in clinical practice and routine postoperative monitoring of patients with microtia.
Keywords
- auricular reconstruction
- microtia
- photogrammetry
- 3DF Zephyr
- smartphone photography
- 3D modelling
- bilateral symmetry
- anthropometry
Дата поступления: 24.03.2026
Дата принятия в печать: 13.04.2026
Дата публикации: 21.05.2026
- Kolodzynski MN, Kon M, Egger S, Breugem CC. Mechanisms of ear trauma and reconstructive techniques in 105 consecutive patients. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2016;274(2):723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4299-4
- Asirova GV, Madina SI, Almeida D, Ganshin IB. Beautiful relationship between art and medicine: from clay modeling to auricular cartilage modeling. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(3-2):71-77. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202503271
- Lin Y, Dobbe JGG, Lachkar N, Ronde EM, Smit TH, Breugem CC, Streekstra GJ. A three-dimensional algorithm for precise measurement of human auricle parameters. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):10760. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61351-5
- Wang D, Jiang H, Pan B, Yang Q, He L, Sun H, Yu X, Lin L. Standardized measurement of auricle: a method of high-precision and reliability based on 3D scanning and Mimics software. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2019;18(6):4575-4582. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.8159
- Mussi E, Servi M, Facchini F, Volpe Y. A rapid prototyping approach for custom training of autologous ear reconstruction. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. 2021;15(4):577.
- Ross MT, Cruz R, Brooks-Richards TL, Hafner LM. Comparison of three-dimensional surface scanning techniques for capturing the external ear. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. 2018;13(4):255.
- Netshilindi N, Michaels A, Maart R. An innovative digital workflow for the fabrication of a prosthetic ear: a case report. SADJ: Journal of the South African Dental Association. 2023;78(2):92.
- Tanveer W, Ridwan-Pramana A, Molinero-Mourelle P, Forouzanfar T. Applications of CAD/CAM technology for craniofacial implants placement and manufacturing of auricular prostheses — systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(18):5950. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185950
- Yadav S, Narayan AI, Choudhry A, Balakrishnan D. CAD/CAM-assisted auricular prosthesis fabrication for a quick, precise, and more retentive outcome: a clinical report. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017;6(7):616. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12589
- Buzayan MM, Elkezza AH, Ahmad SF, Mohd Salleh N, Sivakumar I. A comparative evaluation of photogrammetry software programs and conventional impression techniques for the fabrication of nasal maxillofacial prostheses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;134(1):268-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.027
- Nightingale RC, Ross MT, Cruz RLJ, Allenby MC, Powell SK, Woodruff MA. Frugal 3D scanning using smartphones provides an accessible framework for capturing the external ear. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2021;74(11):3066-3072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.131
- Donato L, Cecchi R, Goldoni M, Ubelaker DH. Photogrammetry vs CT Scan: evaluation of accuracy of a low-cost three-dimensional acquisition method for forensic facial approximation. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2020;65(4):1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14319
- Díez-Montiel A, Pose-Díez-de-la-Lastra A, González-Álvarez A, Salmerón JI, Pascau J, Ochandiano S. Tablet-based augmented reality and 3D printed templates in fully guided microtia reconstruction: a clinical workflow. 3D Printing in Medicine. 2024;10(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00213-2
- Núñez JAV, Ocampo-Godínez JM, Vàzquez-Vàzquez FC, Apellaniz-Campo A, Villegas EOL, Álvarez-Pérez MA. Innovative approaches in microtia treatment: advancements in tissue engineering and scaffold design. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2025;53(11):3031-3046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-025-03851-7
- Chen ZC, Albdour MN, Lizardo JA, Chen YA, Chen PK. Precision of three-dimensional stereo-photogrammetry (3dMDTM) in anthropometry of the auricle and its application in microtia reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2015;68(5):622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.02.020
- Nightingale RC, Price GL, Pickering E, Powell SK, Woodruff MA. Comprehensive smartphone-based 3D scanning framework for capturing the external ear. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2025; 108:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.06.011
- Fraley JJ, Imeri A, Fidan I, Chandramouli M. A comparative study on affordable photogrammetry tools. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Expositon. Accessed March 18, 2026. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344813062_A_Comparative_Study_on_Affordable_Photogrammetry_Tools
Recommended articles:
Reconstruction of auricles: assessment of microcirculation in retroauricular rotational flap using laser Doppler flowmetry.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(1):7-13
Morphometric analysis of the coronoid process of the mandible: variability of parameters and classification of morphotypes.Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2026;10(1):13-21
Beautiful relationship between art and medicine: from clay modeling to auricular cartilage modeling.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(3-2):71-77
Ethnic rhinoplasty: a review of modern approaches and ethnocultural aspects.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2-2):82-90
Cephalometry and colummetry in surgical rejuvenation of the lower two-thirds of the face and neck.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2-2):69-74
Face proportionality angle in surgical rejuvenation of the lower two-thirds of the face.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2):11-17
New cephalometric parameters for assessing the harmony, aesthetics and proportions of the face.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4-2):45-51
