OBJECTIVE
Clinical and economic analysis of anti-VEGF therapy in adults with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We analyzed clinical efficacy of brolucizumab, aflibercept and ranibizumab for the treatment of nAMD in adults. Moreover, «cost minimization» for two scenarios of anti-VEGF therapy in the Russian Federation were assessed (taking into account the cost of anti-VEGF drugs only and intravitreal injections (IVI) within inpatient care with payment system based on disease-related groups (DRG)).
RESULTS
A. Skelly et al. (2020) performed a meta-analysis of brolucizumab, aflibercept and ranibizumab in adults with nAMD. They found that all drugs similarly influenced the maximum corrected visual acuity. However, brolucizumab required fewer injections compared to aflibercept and ranibizumab in any treatment regimens. Cost minimization analysis found that annual cost of brolucizumab therapy for one patient was lower by 36% compared to aflibercept and 35% compared to ranibizumab. After 2 years, this difference was 37% and 38% for aflibercept and ranibizumab, respectively. Cost minimization analysis for inpatient DRG-based care showed that annual cost of brolucizumab therapy for one patient was lower by 21% and 30% compared to aflibercept and ranibizumab, respectively. After 2 years, this difference was 22% and 32%, respectively. Analysis of sensitivity confirmed stable results in fluctuations of the «price of drugs» parameter within +/– 20% for scenario with calculation of medication cost only and the parameter «IVI frequency» within +/– 10% for scenario with calculation of cost of IVI within DRG.
CONCLUSION
Brolucizumab therapy in adults with nAMD leads to decrease in direct medical costs and volume of medical care compared to aflibercept and ranibizumab.