Incidence of proximal femur fractures in patients aged 60 years and older in the Russian Federation

Seryapina Yu.V.; Fedyaev D.V.; Musina N.Z.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20204002159

Seryapina Yu.V.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care

Scopus AuthorID: 57373554500
ORCID: 0000-0003-2607-8765

Fedyaev D.V.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education;
Research Financial Institute

ORCID: 0000-0001-8977-5934

Musina N.Z.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care;
St. Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University;
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

SPIN RSCI: 7656-0204
Scopus AuthorID: 56526954600
ResearcherID: C-8075-2018
ORCID: 0000-0002-6914-6222

Incidence of proximal femur fractures in patients aged 60 years and older in the Russian Federation

Authors:

Seryapina Yu.V., Fedyaev D.V., Musina N.Z.

More about the authors

Journal: Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2020;(2): 59‑66

DOI: 10.17116/medtech20204002159

Read: 5367 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Seryapina YuV, Fedyaev DV, Musina NZ. Incidence of proximal femur fractures in patients aged 60 years and older in the Russian Federation. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2020;(2):59‑66. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20204002159

Подписка 2026 Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор (Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of proximal femur fractures in patients aged 60 years and older in the Russia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of literature data on the incidence of proximal femur fractures In Russia and the world was carried out. We used mathematical modeling of a population of patients aged 60 years and older in two scenarios for assessment of the incidence of proximal femur fractures In Russia (incidence according to literature data, actual number of admissions and patients' pathways.

RESULTS

Morbidity coefficients were calculated considering actual number of hospitalizations and routing of patients with proximal femur fractures. These data are comparable with the results of European population studies. The proportion of patients hospitalized for specialized medical care made up 38.59%. The total annual number of patients with proximal femur fractures in the Russia was 237,345 that significantly exceeds national literature data (125,016 people).

CONCLUSION

According to modern data, incidence of proximal femur fractures In Russia is significantly underestimated. Regional system for patients' pathways with proximal femur fractures does not ensure adequate level of hospitalization and, as a result, does not reflect the real incidence of this disease.

Keywords:

proximal femur fracture

incidence

geriatrics

hospitalization

Authors:

Seryapina Yu.V.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care

Scopus AuthorID: 57373554500
ORCID: 0000-0003-2607-8765

Fedyaev D.V.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education;
Research Financial Institute

ORCID: 0000-0001-8977-5934

Musina N.Z.

Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care;
St. Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University;
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

SPIN RSCI: 7656-0204
Scopus AuthorID: 56526954600
ResearcherID: C-8075-2018
ORCID: 0000-0002-6914-6222

Received:

08.05.2020

Accepted:

15.05.2020

Close metadata

References:

Natsional’nyj proekt «Demografiya». Accessed December 24, 2019. (In Russ.). www.rosmintrud.ru/ministry/programms/demography
Ershova OB, Belova KYu, Belov MV, Ganert OA, Romanova MA, Sinitsyna OS. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in the urban population of the Russian Federation: the results of a multicenter study. Bol. Sustavy. Pozvonochnik. 2012;3:88-90. (In Russ.)
Elliott J, Beringer T, Kee F, Marsh D, Willis C, Stevenson M. Predicting survival after treatment for fracture of the proximal femur and the effect of delays to surgery. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003;56(8):788-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00129-x
Zabolevaemost’ naseleniya po osnovnym klassam boleznej v 2000—2013 gg. Accessed December 24, 2019. (In Russ.). https://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b15_11/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d01/09-03.htm
Zdravookhranenie v Rossii. 2019. Statisticheskij sbornik M.: Rosstat; 2019. (In Russ.)
Travmatizm, ortopedicheskaya zabolevaemost’, sostoyanie travmatologo-ortopedicheskoj pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2017 g. M. 2018. (In Russ.)
Chislennost’ postoyannogo naseleniya na 1 yanvarya. Rosstat. Accessed November 25, 2019. (In Russ.). https://showdata.gks.ru/report/278928
Vorontsova TN, Bogopolskaya AS, Cherny AZh, Shevchenko SB. The structure of the contingent of patients with fractures of the proximal femur and the calculation of the average annual need for emergency surgical treatment. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2016;1:7-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2016-0-1-7-20
Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J, Bhandari M. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2010;182(15):1609-1616. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.092220
van de Ree CLP, De Jongh MAC, Peeters CMM, de Munter L, Roukema JA, Gosens T. Hip Fractures in Elderly People: Surgery or No Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2017;8(3):173-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458517713821
Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y. Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2008;55:146-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03016088
Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporosis International. 1997;7(5):407-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00004148
Dimai HP, Svedbom A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Pieber T, Resch H, Zwettler E. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Austria: evidence for a change in the secular trend. Osteoporosis International. 2011; 22(2):685-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1271-9
Rosengren BE, Ahlborg HG, Mellström D, Nilsson JA, Björk J, Karlsson MK. Secular trends in Swedish hip fractures 1987-2002: birth cohort and period effects. Epidemiology. 2012;23(4):623-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318256982a
Perez JV, Warwick DJ, Case CP, Bannister GC. Death after proximal femoral fracture — an autopsy study. Injury. 1995;26(4):237-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)90008-l
Budanova IV. Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur among residents of the city of Ryazan. Rossiyskij mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2006;14(1):65-70. (In Russ.)
Gladkova EN, Khodyrev EN, Lesnyak OM. Analysis of the state of medical care and outcomes in patients with fractures of the proximal femur (data from a population study). Osteoporoz i osteopatii. 2011;14(3):7-10. (In Russ.)
Raskina TA, Averkieva YuV. Medical and social consequences and quality of life in patients of an older age group with fractures of the proximal femur. Sovremennaya revmatologiya. 2014;8(3):51-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2014-3-51-55
Raskina TA, Averkieva YuV. Outcomes in hip fractures in people of the older age group of Kemerovo, depending on the management of patients. Sibirskij meditsinskij zhurnal. 2011;100(1):151-154. (In Russ.)