Analysis of learning curves for mini-gastric bypass in 341 patients with obesity

Matveev I.A.

Tyumen State Medical University;
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1

ORCID: 0000-0003-1312-1971

Popov I.B.

Tyumen State Medical University;
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1

ORCID: 0009-0004-8804-2279

Mashkin A.M.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

ORCID: 0000-0003-2321-2818

Dmitriev A.V.

Tyumen State Medical University;
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1

ORCID: 0009-0007-5979-4895

Yakhyaev E.Z.

Medical unit «Neftyanik»

Borodin N.A.

Tyumen State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-2760-0351

Khasiya D.T.

Tyumen State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-5661-7603

Matreninskikh A.O.

Tyumen State Medical University

ORCID: 0009-0008-9956-0599

Analysis of learning curves for mini-gastric bypass in 341 patients with obesity

Authors:

Matveev I.A., Popov I.B., Mashkin A.M., Dmitriev A.V., Yakhyaev E.Z., Borodin N.A., Khasiya D.T., Matreninskikh A.O.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(9): 22‑29

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202409122

Downloaded: 9

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Matveev IA, Popov IB, Mashkin AM, et al. . Analysis of learning curves for mini-gastric bypass in 341 patients with obesity. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(9):22‑29. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202409122

Подписка 2025 (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To analyze learning curves and appropriate experience on the features of mini-bypass surgery in 341 obese patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 341 laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass surgeries performed by one surgeon were studied. The median age of patients was 40.5 [34; 48.3] years. There were 284 (83.2%) women and 57 (16.8%) men. The median BMI was 45 [40;52] kg/m².

RESULTS

The period of MGB development consisted of 138 interventions. Surgery time was 120 [100; 130] min and 90 [82.5; 100] mins after development of this technique (p=0.001). Complications occurred in 5 (1.5%) patients (1 patient with Clavien Dindo grade IIIA and 4 ones with grade IIIB). Of these, there were 3 patients with stapler suture defects. There were no complications only in the 4th quartile of surgeries. Surgical experience significantly affects postoperative outcomes. Surgery time was more influenced by surgical skill rather technique of anastomosis imposing.

CONCLUSION

Polynomial regression objectively characterizes development of surgical skills lasting 138 interventions. MGB is safe for morbid obesity with a complication rate of 1.5% and no mortality.

Keywords:

bariatric surgery

mini-gastric bypass surgery

learning curves

Authors:

Matveev I.A.

Tyumen State Medical University;
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1

ORCID: 0000-0003-1312-1971

Popov I.B.

Tyumen State Medical University;
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1

ORCID: 0009-0004-8804-2279

Mashkin A.M.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

ORCID: 0000-0003-2321-2818

Dmitriev A.V.

Tyumen State Medical University;
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1

ORCID: 0009-0007-5979-4895

Yakhyaev E.Z.

Medical unit «Neftyanik»

Borodin N.A.

Tyumen State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-2760-0351

Khasiya D.T.

Tyumen State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-5661-7603

Matreninskikh A.O.

Tyumen State Medical University

ORCID: 0009-0008-9956-0599

Received:

11.01.2024

Accepted:

27.02.2024

List of references:

Polyakov AA, Soloviev AO, Bessonov KA, Vorobyova AA. Recent advancements in bariatric surgery for obesity treatment. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2023;12(3):7987. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/dokgastro20231203179
Golub VA, Kosivtsov OA, Bublikov AE, Ievlev VA. Bariatric surgery: modern view (review). Journal of Volgograd State Medical University. 2022;19(3):14-19. (In Russ.).
Golivets TP, Dubonosov DG, Licrison SV. Obesity and Associated Diseases — Problematic Issues of Pathogenesis and Modern Strategies for Diagnosis and Treatment. Challenges in Modern Medicine. 2023;46(2):123-143. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0940-2023-46-2-123-143
Verbovoy AF, Sharonova LA. Obesity: epidemiological and socio-economic aspects, prevention. Endocrinology: news, opinions, training. 2019;8(3):87-97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2304-9529-2019-13009
Anisimova KA, Vasilevskii DI, Balandov SG, Korolkov AYu, Hamid ZM. Modern principles of prevention of early postoperative complications in bariatric surgery (review of literature). Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2022;181(1):107-111. (In Russ.).
Brown W, Shikora S, Liem R, Holland J, Campbell AB, Sprinkhuizen SM, Kuijpers S, Kow L. 7th IFSO global registry report. International federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders. 2022. Accessed January 24, 2023. https://www.ifso.com/pdf/ifso-7th-registry-report-2022.pdf
Wehrtmann FS, de la Garza JR, Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Müller K, Tapking C, Probst P, Diener MK, Fischer L, Müller-Stich BP, Nickel F. Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization. Obesity Surgery. 2020;30(2):640-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04230-7
Shin RB. Evaluation of the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2005;1(2):91-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2005.01.003
de Beaux AC. Simulation-based training and learning curves in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 887-895). British Journal of Surgery. 2012;99(7):896. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8752
Sarkaria IS, Latif MJ, Bianco VJ, Bains MS, Rusch VW, Jones DR, Rizk NP. Early operative outcomes and learning curve of robotic assisted giant paraesophageal hernia repair. International Journal of Medical Robotics. 2017;13(1):10.1002/rcs.1730. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1730
Unguryan VM, Kruglov EA, Pobedintseva YuA. Learning curves in minimally invasive oncology. Endoscopic Surgery. 2020;26(4):54-58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20202604154
Kozlov YuA, Novozhilov VA, Baradieva PA, Razumovskij AYu. Training curves for endosurgical interventions in neonates and infants. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I. Pirogova. 2016;1:44-49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2016144-49
Rapoport LM, Bezrukov EA, Carichenko DG, Martirosyan GA, Suhanov RB, Krupinov GE, Slusarenko RI, Morozov AO, Avakyan SK, Sargsyan NA. Methods for training of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I. Pirogova. 2019;1:89-94. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201901189
Major P, Wysocki M, Dworak J, Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Budzyński A. Are bariatric operations performed by residents safe and efficient? Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2017;13(4):614-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.017
de Leval MR, François K, Bull C, Brawn W, Spiegelhalter D. Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures. Application to a series of neonatal arterial switch operations. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1994;107(3):914-23; discussion 923-4.
Pusic MV, Boutis K, Hatala R, Cook DA. Learning curves in health professions education. Academy of Medicine. 2015;90(8):1034-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000681
Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT. Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technology Assessment. 2001;5(12):1-79. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta5120
Valsamis EM, Chouari T, O’Dowd-Booth C, Rogers B, Ricketts D. Learning curves in surgery: variables, analysis and applications. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2018;94(1115):525-530. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135880
Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Measuring the surgical ‘learning curve’: methods, variables and competency. BJU International. 2014;113:504-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12197
Harrysson IJ, Cook J, Sirimanna P, Feldman LS, Darzi A, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of learning curves for minimally invasive abdominal surgery: a review of the methodology of data collection, depiction of outcomes, and statistical analysis. Annals of Surgery. 2014;260:37-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000596
Tyutyunnik PS, Khatkov IE, Tsvirkun VV, Izrailov RE, Khisamov AA, Andrianov AV. Selection of the optimal model for constructing a learning curve in laparoscopic surgery using the example of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Endoscopic surgery. 2015;21(5):45-49. (In Russ.).
Del Rio P, Arcuri MF, Pisani P, De Simone B, Sianesi M. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT): what is the real advantage? Langenbeck’s Archives Surgery. 2010;395(4):323-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0589-2
Liu S, Qiu M, Jiang DZ, Zheng XM, Zhang W, Shen HL, Shan CX. The learning curve for endoscopic thyroidectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Surgical Endoscopy. 2009;23(8):1802-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0332-7
Kroc E, Olvera Astivia OL. The case for the curve: Parametric regression with second- and third-order polynomial functions of predictors should be routine. Psychological Methods. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000629

Close metadata