Until recently, clinical studies in the field of robotic-assisted surgery have been conducted in Russia only on the basis of the DaVinci system. The advent of a new robotic system separated the concept of «robotic surgery» from DaVinci. An increase in the number of alternative surgical robots will expand the possibilities of studying the functionality of these systems, differences in their operation, safety and efficiency for patients, and convenience for surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of own initial experience of using Senhance robotic surgical system in the work of the general surgery department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective collection of data on the surgical treatment of patients with various pathologies using the Senhance robotic system was carried out, followed by its analysis in relation to the duration of the operation, the incidence of intraoperative complications and the need for conversion, as well as the volume of blood loss and early postoperative complications.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Now, only perioperative, and early postoperative data are available for analysis. While accumulating our own experience with the Senhance system, we concluded that, since the transition from robotic to manual laparoscopic surgery and vice versa does not require changing of access points and is performed quickly, it is practically expedient to perform some stages of the operation manually, and others using surgical robot. For example, with the help of manual laparoscopy, it is more ergonomic to perform wide tractions and movements of organs and tissues. At the same time, robotic surgery has undeniable advantages when performing lymph node dissection, performing manual sutures, including anastomoses, which does not lead to an increase in the duration of the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Presented experience of using the Senhance system has shown that it meets the declared indicators of convenience, efficiency and safety of operations in general surgery.