The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Pushkar' D.Iu.

kafedra urologii Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo mediko-stomatologicheskogo universiteta

Govorov A.V.

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistryr

Rasner P.I.

Department of Urology, Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia

Kolontarev K.B.

Department of Urology, Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia

The role of simulators in teaching for robot-assisted surgery

Authors:

Pushkar' D.Iu., Govorov A.V., Rasner P.I., Kolontarev K.B.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(3): 82‑88

Read: 883 times


To cite this article:

Pushkar' DIu, Govorov AV, Rasner PI, Kolontarev KB. The role of simulators in teaching for robot-assisted surgery. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(3):82‑88. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018382-88

Recommended articles:
Robo­tic and thoracoscopic surgeries for ante­rior mediastinal neoplasms. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(2):6-12
Robot-assisted ovarian tera­toma rese­ction. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2024;(5):54-58
Aortoiliac reco­nstruction with the quadrifurcated graft using robo­tics. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(5):561-565
App-based first aid learning: what applications do we have now?. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2024;(6):89-103
Redo anti­reflux surgery: a comparative evaluation of lapa­roscopic and robot-assisted techniques. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2025;(3):14-20

References:

  1. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, et al. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology. 2010;76:357-360.
  2. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, et al. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. BJU Int. 2011;107:1130-1135.
  3. Kesavadas T, Kumar A, Srimathveeravalli G, et al. Efficacy of Robotic Surgery Simulator (RoSS) for the da Vinci Surgical System. J Urol. 2009;181(suppl 823).
  4. Guru K, Baheti A, Kesavadas T, et al. In-vivo videos enhance cognitive skilla for da Vinci Surgical System. J Urol. 2009;181(suppl 823).
  5. Gavazzi A, Bahsoun AN, Van Haute W, et al. Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot). Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:146-150.
  6. Van der Meijden OA, Broeders IA, Schijven MP. The SEP «Robot»: a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the da Vinci surgical system? Surg Technol Int. 2010;19:51-58.
  7. McDonough P, Peterson A, Brand T. Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance. J Urol. 2010;183(suppl 515).
  8. Lendvay TS, Casale P, Sweet R, et al. VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;132:242-244.
  9. Jonsson MN, Mahmood M, Askerud T, et al. ProMISTM can serve as a da Vinci simulator — a construct validity study. J Endourol. 2011;25:345-350.
  10. Fiedler MJ, Chen SJ, Judkins TN, et al. Virtual reality for robotic laparoscopic surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:127-129.
  11. Sethi AS, Peine WJ, Mohammadi Y, et al. Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. J Endourol. 2009;23:503-508.
  12. Kenney PA, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, et al. Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology. 2009;73:1288-1292.
  13. Korets R, Graversen JA, Mues A, et al. Face and construct validity assessment of 2nd generation robotic surgery simulator. J Urol. 2011;185(suppl 488).
  14. Korets R, Mues AC, Graversen J, et al. Comparison of robotic surgery skill acquisition between DV-Trainer and da Vinci surgical system: a randomized controlled study. J Urol. 2011;185(suppl 593).
  15. Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, et al. Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol. 2010;24:467-472.
  16. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, et al. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol. 2011;186:1019-1024.
  17. Fiedler MJ, Chen SJ, Judkins TN, et al. Virtual reality for robotic laparoscopic surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:127-129.
  18. Katsavelis D, Siu KC, Brown-Clerk B, et al. Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:66-73.
  19. Davis JW, Kamat A, Munsell M, et al. Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized. BJU Int. 2010;105:1148-1154.
  20. Van der Vleuten C. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996;1:41-67.
  21. Ahmed K, Miskovic D, Darzi A, et al. Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2011;202:469-480.
  22. Neary PC, Boyle E, Delaney CP, et al. Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2301-2309.
  23. Pellen MG, Horgan LF, Barton JR, et al. Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:130-139.
  24. Feifer A, Al-Ammari A, Kovac E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality and hybrid simulation for robotic surgical training. BJU Int. 2011;108:1652-1656.
  25. Kolontarev K.B. Robot-assistirovannaya radikal'naya prostatektomiya: Dis... d-ra med. nauk. M.: GOU VPO MGMSU; 2015.
  26. Kolontarev K.B., Pushkar' D.Yu., Rasner P.I. Obuchenie robot-assistirovannoi khirurgii. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii DZ Moskva №17. M. 2015.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.