The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Lysenko A.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Lednev P.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Salagaev G.I.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Malmina A.I.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Gilevskaya Yu.S.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Surgical treatment of a potentially fatal complication after redo cardiac surgery

Authors:

Lysenko A.V., Lednev P.V., Salagaev G.I., Malmina A.I., Gilevskaya Yu.S.

More about the authors

Read: 1226 times


To cite this article:

Lysenko AV, Lednev PV, Salagaev GI, Malmina AI, Gilevskaya YuS. Surgical treatment of a potentially fatal complication after redo cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;17(3):313‑316. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202417031313

Recommended articles:
What we have to change in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infa­rction?. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(2):183-190
Sele­ction of opti­mal aortotomy in various cardiac surgeries. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):306-309
Redo mitral valve replacement for dysfunction of mitral bioprosthesis. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(4):490-492
Redo frozen elephant trunk procedures after surgical treatment of acute aortic dissection type I. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(5):503-510
Redo asce­nding aortic surgery: outcomes and risk factors of complications. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(5):511-519
Meta-analysis on the rele­vance of septal myectomy in aortic valve replacement. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(10-2):94-99

References:

  1. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143:e72-e227. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.000000000000092
  2. Tasoudis PT, Varvoglis DN, Vitkos E, Mylonas KS, Sá MP, Ikonomidis JS, Caranasos TG, Athanasiou T. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(1):ezac268. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac268
  3. Isaacs AJ, Shuhaiber J, Salemi A, Isom OW, Sedrakyan A. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1262-9. e3. 
  4. Diaz R, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Alvarez-Cabo R, Avanzas P, Silva J, Moris C, Pascual I. Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prosthesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158:706-714.e18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.14
  5. Zhao DF, Seco M, Wu JJ, Edelman JB, Wilson MK, Vallely MP, Byrpm MJ, Bannon PG. Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Middle-Aged Adults: A Sys-tematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:315-327. 
  6. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused update of the 2015 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:252-289. 
  7. Chiang YP, Chikwe J, Moskowitz AJ, Itagaki S, Adams DH, Egorova NN. Survival and long term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. JAMA. 2014;312:1323-1329.
  8. Goldstone AB, Chiu P, Baiocchi M, Lingala B, Patrick WL, Fischbein MP, et al. Mechanical or biologic prostheses for aortic-valve and mitral-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1847-1857.
  9. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD, Mullany CJ, Sundt TM, Dearany JA, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50—70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:878-884. 
  10. Furukawa H, Tanemoto K. Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62:19-2. 
  11. Lysenko AV, Salagaev GI, Lednev PV, Belov YuV. Redo heart valve replacement in patients with dysfunction of biological prostheses. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2023;16(2):156-160. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202316021156
  12. Petrishchev YuI, Levit AL. Predictors of multiple organ failure after cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2022;(3):68-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202203168

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.