The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 101-59-87
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Lysenko A.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Lednev P.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Salagaev G.I.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Malmina A.I.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Gilevskaya Yu.S.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Surgical treatment of a potentially fatal complication after redo cardiac surgery

Authors:

Lysenko A.V., Lednev P.V., Salagaev G.I., Malmina A.I., Gilevskaya Yu.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;17(3): 313‑316

DOI: 10.17116/kardio202417031313

Views: 431

Downloaded: 12

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Lysenko AV, Lednev PV, Salagaev GI, Malmina AI, Gilevskaya YuS. Surgical treatment of a potentially fatal complication after redo cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;17(3):313‑316. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202417031313

Подписка 2025 (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Predictors and impact of myocardial injury (VARC-3 criteria) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(5):489-498
Aortic homo­graft in redo aortic root surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(6):686-690
Seco­ndary mammoplasty. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2024;(3):44-51
Surgical aspe­cts of repeat anti­reflux inte­rventions for recu­rrent reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(3):20-25
Redo right ventricular outflow tract repair for destruction of xeno­pericardial patch with mono­cusp. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(10):97-101
Cere­bral protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):150-158

Redo cardiac surgery is associated with high risk of complications. The authors present surgical treatment of life-threatening complications after redo aortic valve replacement in a patient with aortic bioprosthesis.

Keywords:

redo replacement
aortic stenosis
biological valve
mechanical prosthesis
redo surgery
left ventricular wall rupture
supracoronary ascending aortic replacement

Authors:

Lysenko A.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Lednev P.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Salagaev G.I.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Malmina A.I.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Gilevskaya Yu.S.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Received:

10.01.2024

Accepted:

29.01.2024

List of references:

  1. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143:e72-e227. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.000000000000092
  2. Tasoudis PT, Varvoglis DN, Vitkos E, Mylonas KS, Sá MP, Ikonomidis JS, Caranasos TG, Athanasiou T. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(1):ezac268. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac268
  3. Isaacs AJ, Shuhaiber J, Salemi A, Isom OW, Sedrakyan A. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1262-9. e3. 
  4. Diaz R, Hernandez-Vaquero D, Alvarez-Cabo R, Avanzas P, Silva J, Moris C, Pascual I. Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prosthesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158:706-714.e18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.14
  5. Zhao DF, Seco M, Wu JJ, Edelman JB, Wilson MK, Vallely MP, Byrpm MJ, Bannon PG. Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Middle-Aged Adults: A Sys-tematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:315-327. 
  6. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused update of the 2015 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:252-289. 
  7. Chiang YP, Chikwe J, Moskowitz AJ, Itagaki S, Adams DH, Egorova NN. Survival and long term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. JAMA. 2014;312:1323-1329.
  8. Goldstone AB, Chiu P, Baiocchi M, Lingala B, Patrick WL, Fischbein MP, et al. Mechanical or biologic prostheses for aortic-valve and mitral-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1847-1857.
  9. Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD, Mullany CJ, Sundt TM, Dearany JA, et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50—70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:878-884. 
  10. Furukawa H, Tanemoto K. Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62:19-2. 
  11. Lysenko AV, Salagaev GI, Lednev PV, Belov YuV. Redo heart valve replacement in patients with dysfunction of biological prostheses. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2023;16(2):156-160. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202316021156
  12. Petrishchev YuI, Levit AL. Predictors of multiple organ failure after cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2022;(3):68-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202203168

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register


We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.