The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Khokhlunov S.M.

Samara State Medical University

Kislukhin T.V.

Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary

Salamov G.V.

Samara State Medical University;
Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary

Kostyrin E.Yu.

Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary

Tumanov A.I.

Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary

Titov A.L.

Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary

Patrikeeva A.A.

Polyakov Samara Regional Clinical Cardiology Dispensary

Single-stent and double-stent strategy for complex, true and false bifurcation lesions of the left main coronary artery in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a single-center retrospective analysis

Authors:

Khokhlunov S.M., Kislukhin T.V., Salamov G.V., Kostyrin E.Yu., Tumanov A.I., Titov A.L., Patrikeeva A.A.

More about the authors

Read: 1321 times


To cite this article:

Khokhlunov SM, Kislukhin TV, Salamov GV, Kostyrin EYu, Tumanov AI, Titov AL, Patrikeeva AA. Single-stent and double-stent strategy for complex, true and false bifurcation lesions of the left main coronary artery in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a single-center retrospective analysis. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;17(1):29‑40. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20241701129

Recommended articles:
What we have to change in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infa­rction?. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(2):183-190

References:

  1. Gastelurrutia P, Lupón J, Altimir S, et al. Fragility is a key determinant of survival in heart failure patients. Intern J Cardiol. 2014;175(1):62-66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.237
  2. Jolly SS, Cairns JA, Yusuf S, et al; TOTAL Investigators. Randomized trial of primary PCI with or without routine manual thrombectomy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(15):1389-1398. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415098
  3. Thrane PG, Kristensen SD, Olesen KKW, et al. 16-year follow-up of the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction 2 (DANAMI-2) trial: primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2020;7(41):847-854.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz595
  4. Bittl JA, He Y, Jacobs AK, et al., for the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Bayesian methods affirm the use of percutaneous coronary intervention to improve survival in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2013;127:2177-2185. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000646
  5. Ermolaev PM, Kavteladze ZA, Bilaonov AT, Danilenko SYu, Brutyan GA, Asatryan KV. Endovascular treatment of left main coronary artery in acute coronary syndrome with persistent ST segment elevation. Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 2020;7(4):345-356. (In Russ.).
  6. Manchurov VN, Martynova MM, Oskanov MB, Anisimov KV, Skrypnik DV, Vasileva EYu, Shpektor AV. Endovascular treatment in patients with acute left main coronary artery occlusion. Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 2019;6(2):126-132. (In Russ.).
  7. Édes IF, Ruzsa Z, Lux A′, et al. Acute, total occlusion of the left main stem: coronary intervention options, outcomes, and recommendations. Postepy Kardiol. Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(3):233-239.  https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.78325
  8. Barbarash OL, Polikutina OM, Tavlueva EV, et al. Left main coronary artery lesion: view of cardiologist. Kreativnaya Kardiologiya. 2015;(2):5-15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15275/kreatkard.2015.02.01
  9. Medina A, Surez de Lezo J, Pan M. A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Esp cardiol. 2006;59(2):183-184. 
  10. Alfonso F, Gonzalo N, Rivero F, Escaned J. The year in cardiovascular medicine 2020: interventional cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(10)7:985-1003. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1096
  11. Burzotta F, Lassen JF, Lefèvre T, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club 2021. EuroIntervention. 2021;16:1307-1317. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169
  12. Jun-Jie Zhang, Fei Ye, Kai Xu, et al. Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(27):2523-2536. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa543
  13. Thuijs D, Kappetein P, Serruys P, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2019;12;394(10206):1325-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X
  14. Buszman PE, Buszman PP, Banasiewicz-Szkrobka I, et al. Left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization: 10-year outcomes of the (Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting) LE MANS trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:318-327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.044
  15. Park D-W, Ahn J-M, Park H, et al.; On behalf of the PRECOMBAT Investigators. Ten-year outcomes after drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary disease: extended follow-up of the PRECOMBAT trial. Circulation. 2020;141:1437-1446. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.046039
  16. Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, et al.; EXCEL Trial Investigators. Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;381:1820-1830. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmx200004
  17. Holm NR, Mäkikallio T, Lindsay MM, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2020;395:191-199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1
  18. Hildick-Smith D., Egred M., Banning A. et al. The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBCMAIN). Eur Heart J. 2021;00:1-11.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283
  19. Neumann F-J, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:87-165.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
  20. Abugov SA, Saakyan YuM, Puretskiy MV, Polyakov RS, Mardanyan GV, Pirkova AA, Turundaeva AN, Kudrinskiy AV, Vartanyan EL. Long-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left main and multivessel lesions using everolimus-eluting stents. Russian Journal of Endovascular Surgery. 2018;5(3):324-329. (In Russ.).
  21. Collet C, Capodanno D, Onuma Y, et al. Left main coronary artery disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15:321-331.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0001-4
  22. Chen SL, Xu B, Han YL, et al. Comparison of double kissing crush versus culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1482-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.023

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.