Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting for on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

Yusupov A.I.; Vitsukaev V.V.; Zakharevich V.M.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20201301156

References:

Lysenko AV, Belov YuV. The main stages and prospects of development. Cardiology and cardiovascular surgery. 2014;6:1823. (In Russ.)
Head SJ, Kieser TM, Falk V, Huysmans HA, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting: Part 1the evolution over the first 50 years. European heart journal. 2013 Oct;34(37):2862-2872. ISSN 1522-9645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht330
Jha AK, Fisher ES, Li Z, Orav EJ, et al. Racial trends in the use of major procedures among the elderly. New England journal of medicine. 2005 Aug;353(7)683-691. ISSN 1533-4406. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa050672
El Bardissi AW, Aranki SF, Sheng S, O’Brien SM, et al. Trends in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2012;143(2):273-281.
Lamy A, Devereaux P, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366(16):1489-1497.
Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). European heart journal. 2010 Oct;31(20):2470-2481. ISSN 1522-9645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq318
Bakaeen FG, Shroyer ALW, Gammie JS, Sabik JF, et al. Trends in use of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2014;148(3):856-864.
Tabata M, Grab JD, Khalpey Z, et al. Prevalence and variability of internal mammary artery graft use in contemporary multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Circulation. 2009 Sept;120(11):935-940. ISSN 1524-4539. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.832444
Head SJ, Parasca CA, Mack MJ, Mohr FW, et al. Differences in baseline characteristics, practice patterns and clinical outcomes in contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting in the United States and Europe: insights from the SYNTAX randomized trial and registry. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2014:47(4): 685-695.
Afilalo J, Rasti M, Ohayon SM, et al. Off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: an updated meta-analysis and meta- regression of randomized trials. European heart journal. 2012 May;33(10):1257-1267. ISSN 1522-9645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr307
Deppe A-C, Arbash W, Kuhn EW, et al. Current evidence of coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump versus on-pump: a systematic review with meta-analysis of over 16,900 patients investigated in randomized controlled trials. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2016 Apr;49(4):1031-1041. ISSN 1873-734X. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv268
Zhbanov IV, Sidorov RV, Kiladze IZ. Choosing the optimal method for performing coronary artery bypass grafting in patients at high risk. Cardiology and cardiovascular surgery. 2014;2:15-18. (In Russ.)
Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BCV, et al. Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke. International journal of stroke: official journal of the International Stroke Society. 2018 Aug;13(6):612-632. ISSN 1747-4949.
Diegeler A, Börgermann, Kappert U, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. New England journal of medicine. 2013 Mar;368(13):1189-1198. ISSN 1533-4406. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211666
Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. New England journal of medicine. 2016 Dec;375(24):2359-2368. ISSN 1533-4406. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601564
Kirmani BH, Holmes MV, Muir AD. Long-Term Survival and Freedom From Reintervention After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity-Matched Study. Circulation. 2016 Oct;134(17):1209-1220. ISSN 1524-4539. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021933
Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. New England journal of medicine. 2009 Nov;361(19):1827-1837. ISSN 1533-4406. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0902905
Lapar DJ, Mery CM, Kozower BD, et al. The effect of surgeon volume on mortality for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2012 Apr;143(4):854-863. ISSN 1097-685X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.048
Murzi M, Caputo M, Aresu G, Duggan S, Angelini GD. Training residents in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a 14-year experience. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2012;143(6):1247-1253.
Konety SH, Rosenthal GE, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS. Surgical volume and outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: does it matter? The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2009;137(5):1116-1123.
Merzlyakov VYu. Minimally invasive myocardial revascularization at the present stage: diss... Doctor of Medical Science: 14.00.44 / Merzlyakov Vadim Yuryevich. M. 2009. 250 p.
Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-592. ISSN 1873-734X. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu366
Lysenko AV. Results of multiple mammarocoronary bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass: diss... Candidate of Medical Science: 14.01.26 / Lysenko Andrei Viktorovich. M. 2012. 152 p.
Frolov AV, Nishonov AB, Zagorodnikov NI. long-term results of coronary artery bypass surgery. Cardiology and cardiovascular surgery. 2019;2:110-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio201912021110
Kieser TM, Lewin AM, Graham MM, Martin B, et al. Outcomes associated with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: the importance of age. Annals of thoracic surgery. 2011 Oct;92(4):1269-1275. ISSN 1552-6259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.083
Lopes RD, Mehta RH, Hafley GE, Williams JB, et al. Relationship between vein graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2012;125(6):749-756.
Zotov AS, Anokhin AV, Arinchev RS, et al. Conduit selection in coronary surgery. Clinical practice. 2015;2:35-45. (In Russ.)
Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, et al. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation. 2014;130(7):539-545.
Kazaryan AV, Volgushev VE, Abovyan AA, Abdullaev AA. A comparison of the immediate results of myocardial revascularization in the bypass Benamara KA, with KA shunting one HAV. Bulletin of the Bakulev Center of RAMS. Cardiovascular diseases. 2006;7:S5. (In Russ.)
Benedetto U, Altman DG, Gerry S, Gray A, et al. Pedicled and skeletonized single and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts and the incidence of sternal wound complications: Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2016;152(1):270-276.
Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). European heart journal. 2010 Oct;31(20):2470-2481. ISSN 1522-9645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq318
Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(26):2540-2549.
Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S, et al. Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years. ISSN 1533-4406. New England journal of medicine. 2019 Jan;380(5):437-446. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1808783
Buttar SN, Yan TD, Taggart DP, Tian DH. Long-term and short- term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis. Heart. 2017;103(18):1419-1426.
Taggart DP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001 Sept;358(9285):870-875. ISSN 0140-6736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X
Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1996;28(3):616-626.
Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2011;92(1):917.
Lopes RD, Mehta RH, Hafley GE, Williams JB, et al. Relationship between vein graft failure and subsequent clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2012;125(6):749-756.
Ahn J-M, Park D-W, Lee CW, Chang M, et al. Comparison of stenting versus bypass surgery according to the completeness of revascularization in severe coronary artery disease: patient-level pooled analysis of the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST trials. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017;10(14):1415-1424.
Benedetto U, Raja SG, Albanese A, Amrani M, et al. Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2014;47(1):59-65.
Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Radial- artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;378(22):2069-2077.
Yanagawa B, Verma S, Mazine A, Tam DY, et al. Impact of total arterial revascularization on long term survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 130,305 patients. International journal of cardiology. 2017;233:29-36.
Gaudino M, Alexander JH, Bakaeen FG, Ballman K, et al. Randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts: the ROMA trialrationale and study protocol. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2017;52(6):1031-1040.
Kappetein AP. Bilateral mammary artery vs. single mammary artery grafting: promising early results: but will the match finish with enough players? European heart journal. 2010 Oct;31(20):2444-2446. ISSN 1522 9645. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq341
Benedetto U, Altman DG, Flather M, Gerry S, Gray A, et al. Incidence and clinical implications of intraoperative bilateral internal thoracic artery graft conversion: Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2018;155(6):2346-2355.
Gaudino M, Bakaeen F, Benedetto U, Rahouma M, Di Franco A, et al. Use rate and outcome in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7(11):e009361.
Schwann TA, Habib RH, Wallace A, Shahian DM, et al. Operative outcomes of multiple-arterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2018;105(4):1109-1119.
Flather M, Delahunty N, Collinson J. Generalizing results of randomized trials to clinical practice: reliability and cautions. Clinical trials. 2006;3(6):508-512.
Pinho-Gomes A-C, Azevedo L, Ahn J-M, Park S-J, et al. Compliance with guideline-directed medical therapy in contemporary coronary revascularization trials. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;71(6):591-602.