The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Shilov A.A.

Research Institute of Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia

Kochergin N.A.

Research Institute of Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia

Ganjukov V.I.

State Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Sosnovy Boulevard, Kemerovo, Russia

Kozyrin K.A.

FGBU "Nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ institut kompleksnykh problem serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniĭ SO RAMN", Moskva

Barbarash L.S.

State Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases Municipal Budget Healthcare Institution, Kemerovo, Russia

Comparative analysis of hybrid myocardial revascularization and multivascular percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease and multivascular coronary disease. 30-day results

Authors:

Shilov A.A., Kochergin N.A., Ganjukov V.I., Kozyrin K.A., Barbarash L.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;9(4): 17‑21

DOI: 10.17116/kardio20169417-21

Read: 967 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HYBRID MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION AND MULTIVASCULAR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND MULTIVASCULAR CORONARY DISEASE. 30-DAY RESULTS
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HYBRID MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION AND MULTIVASCULAR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND MULTIVASCULAR CORONARY DISEASE. 30-DAY RESULTS

To cite this article:

Shilov AA, Kochergin NA, Ganjukov VI, Kozyrin KA, Barbarash LS. Comparative analysis of hybrid myocardial revascularization and multivascular percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease and multivascular coronary disease. 30-day results. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;9(4):17‑21. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20169417-21

Подписка 2026 Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Pharmacological treatment and prevention of ischemia-reperfusion syndrome in percutaneous coro­nary inte­rvention. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(2):191-200
Intravascular physiology and imaging in dete­rmining the indi­cations for reva­scularization in patients with inte­rmediate coro­nary stenosis. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):255-260
Myocardial injury following elective percutaneous coro­nary inte­rventions: prevalence, risk factors and prognostic significance. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):261-268
Imme­diate resu­lts of coro­nary bypass grafting without touching the aorta in patients with multiple-vessel disease: a single-center retrospective study. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):280-285
Increased expression of circular RNA circSPARC and circTMEM181 in coro­nary athe­rosclerosis. Mole­cular Gene­tics, Microbiology and Viro­logy. 2025;(1):24-29
10-year dyna­mics of cardiovascular status in combination with coro­nary angiography data in men of working age in the Arctic region of resi­dence and the south of the Tyumen region. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(4):30-38
Coro­nary artery disease in young women: a modern view on the problem. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(2):5-12
Serum expression of microRNA-21, microRNA-125a, microRNA-125b, microRNA-214 in coro­nary artery disease patients. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(2):13-19
Mani­festation of stenosis of the ante­rior inte­rventricular branch of the left coro­nary artery: the Hiss beam legs blockade. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(5):96-102
Socio-economic damage caused by elevated low-density lipo­protein cholesterol levels. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2025;(2):88-98
Abstract:

Aim - to compare hybrid revascularization including MIDCAB followed by PCI (excluding LAD) and multivascular PCI with drug-covered stents of the second generation in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and multivascular coronary lesion. Material and methods. The study consisted of 103 patients including 53 cases after multivascular PCIs and 50 patients who underwent hybrid myocardial revascularization. We analyzed patients with stable ischemic heart disease and multivascular coronary lesion with stenosis ≥70% (2 or more epicardial coronary arteries including LAD). Patients were randomized into two groups using ‘blind’ envelopes: «hybrid» (MIDCAB + PCI) and "PCI" with multivascular stenting. Results. There were no significant differences between both groups in endpoints incidence within 30-day follow-up. Combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke and repeated revascularization did not significantly differ in both groups (2% in hybrid, 5.7% in PCI; p=0.17).

Keywords:

hybrid revascularization
percutaneous coronary intervention
coronary artery disease
minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass

Authors:

Shilov A.A.

Research Institute of Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia

Kochergin N.A.

Research Institute of Complex Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kemerovo, Russia

Ganjukov V.I.

State Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, Sosnovy Boulevard, Kemerovo, Russia

Kozyrin K.A.

FGBU "Nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ institut kompleksnykh problem serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniĭ SO RAMN", Moskva

Barbarash L.S.

State Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases Municipal Budget Healthcare Institution, Kemerovo, Russia

Close metadata

References:

  1. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(37):2541-2619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278
  2. Repossinia A, Tespilia M, Sainoa A, Kotelnikov I, Moggia A, Di Baccoa L, Munerettoa C. Hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2013;44:288-294. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt016
  3. Byrne JG, Leacche M, Vaughan DE, Zhao DX. Hybrid cardiovascular procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2008;459-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.002
  4. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Mack M, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2375-2384. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1211585
  5. Greinacher A, Farner B, Kroll H, Kohlmann T, Warkentin T, Eichler P. Clinical features of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia including risk factors for thrombosis. A retrospective analysis of 408 patients. Thromb Haemost. 2005. doi: 10.1160/th04-12-0825
  6. Holzhey D, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, et al. Minimally Invasive Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2008;86(6):1856-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.034
  7. Hu S, Li Q, Gao P, et al. Simultaneous Hybrid Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2011;91(2):432-438. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.10.020
  8. Jaffery Z, Kowalski M, Weaver W, Khanal S. A metaanalysis of randomized control trials comparing minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending artery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2007;31(4):691-697. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.018
  9. Kappetein A, Feldman T, Mack M, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. European Heart Journal. 2011;32(17):2125-2134. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213
  10. Kubler P, Reczuch K. The use of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction – is the battle coming to an end? From despair to acceptance. PWKI. 2013;1:50-60. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.34028
  11. Lapierre H, Chan V, Sohmer B, Mesana T, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.066
  12. Mehran R, Rao S, Bhatt D, et al. Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2736-2747. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.009449
  13. Mehta R, Honeycutt E, Shaw L, et al. Clinical and Angiographic Correlates of Short- and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2007;100(10):1538-1542. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.053
  14. Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Riva D, et al. Risk of stroke with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Evidence from a comprehensive network metaanalysis. American Heart Journal. 2013;165(6):910-917.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.011
  15. Peng Zhu, Pengyu Zhou, Yong Sun, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2015 10:63. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0262-5
  16. Serruys P, Morice M, Kappetein A, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(10):961-972. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0804626
  17. Thygesen K, Alpert J, Jaffe A, et al. Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(16):1581-1598. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001
  18. Yun K, Wu Y, Aharonian V, et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: Sixmonth patency rates. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2005;129(3):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.054
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.