The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

At’kova E.L.

Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Astrakhantsev A.F.

N.A. Semashko Central Clinical Hospital Two, OAO «RZhD», Moscow, Russia

Fedorov A.A.

Moskovskiĭ oblastnoĭ NII akusherstva i ginekologii

Reyn D.A.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11 A, B Rossolimo St., Moscow, 119021, Russian Federation

Krakhovetskiĭ N.N.

FGBU "NII glaznykh bolezneĭ" RAMN, Moskva

Yartsev V.D.

Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

The nasal mucosa and outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy

Authors:

At’kova E.L., Astrakhantsev A.F., Fedorov A.A., Reyn D.A., Krakhovetskiĭ N.N., Yartsev V.D.

More about the authors

Read: 2115 times


To cite this article:

At’kova EL, Astrakhantsev AF, Fedorov AA, Reyn DA, Krakhovetskiĭ NN, Yartsev VD. The nasal mucosa and outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2019;81(2):24‑28. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/patol20198102124

Recommended articles:
Pathogenesis of fibrosis deve­lopment in ovarian endo­metriosis. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2025;(2):73-78
Liver invo­lvement in Gaucher disease in children: A lite­rature review and clinical obse­rvations. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2025;(2):78-93
Methods of stenting of the lacrimal tract in the formation of dacryostomy. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(3):60-66
Surgical correction in seco­ndary face­lift. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(2-2):103-107

References:

  1. Beule A. Physiology and pathophysiology of respiratory mucosa of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;9:Doc07. https://doi.org/10.3205/cto000071
  2. Hinz B. Myofibroblasts. Exp Eye Res. 2016;142:56-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.009
  3. Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majno G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971;27(5):549-550.
  4. Cleary PE, Ryan SJ. Mechanisms in traction retinal detachment. Dev Ophthalmol. 1981;2:328-333.
  5. Schmitt-Graff A, Pau H, Spahr R, Piper HM, Skalli O, Gabbiani G. Appearance of alpha-smooth muscle actin in human eye lens cells of anterior capsular cataract and in cultured bovine lens-forming cells. Differentiation. 1990;43(2):115-122.
  6. Desmoulière A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1993;122(1):103-111.
  7. Jun JI, Lau LF. Taking aim at the extracellular matrix: CCN proteins as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(12):945-963. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3599
  8. Wilson SE, Chaurasia SS, Medeiros FW. Apoptosis in the initiation, modulation and termination of the corneal wound healing response. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85(3):305-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2007.06.009
  9. Ali MJ, Mishra DK, Baig F, Naik MN. Histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopic features of a dacryocystorhinostomy ostium cicatrix. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;32(5):333-336. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000000530
  10. Heindl LM, Junemann A, Holbach LM. A clinicopathologic study of nasal mucosa in 350 patients with external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit. 2009;28(1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830802414806
  11. Smirnov G, Pirinen R, Tuomilehto H, Seppa J, Terasvirta M, Uusitalo H. et al. Strong expression of HSP47 in metaplastic nasal mucosa may predict a poor outcome after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011; 89(2):e132-e136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01654.x
  12. Penttilä E, Hyttinen J, Hytti M, Kauppinen A, Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H. et al. Upregulation of inflammatory genes in the nasal mucosa of patients undergoing endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:799-805. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s50195
  13. Koturović Z, Knežević M, Rašić DM. Clinical significance of routine lacrimal sac biopsy during dacryocystorhinostomy: a comprehensive review of literature. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017;17(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2016.1424
  14. Ozer O, Eskiizmir G, Unlü H, Işisağ A, Aslan A. Chronic inflammation: a poor prognostic factor for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(3):839-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1728-2
  15. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(1):76-83.
  16. Marcet MM, Kuk AK, Phelps PO. Evidence-based review of surgical practices in endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction and other new indications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(5):443-448. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000084
  17. Busse H, Muller KM. Development of idiopathic dacryostenosis; clinical and pathological findings. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1977;170:627-632.
  18. Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN. New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2329-2336.
  19. Singh S, Alam MS, Ali MJ, Naik MN. Endoscopic intranasal findings in unilateral primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2017;31(3):128-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2017.05.013

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.