The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Zozulya M.V.

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Lenkin A.I.

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Carotid Doppler ultrasound data as predictors of fluid responsiveness

Authors:

Zozulya M.V., Lenkin A.I.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2024;(4): 14‑23

DOI: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202404114

Read: 1937 times

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

CAROTID DOPPLER ULTRASOUND DATA AS PREDICTORS OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS
CAROTID DOPPLER ULTRASOUND DATA AS PREDICTORS OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS

To cite this article:

Zozulya MV, Lenkin AI. Carotid Doppler ultrasound data as predictors of fluid responsiveness. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2024;(4):14‑23. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202404114

МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Preoperative levo­simendan inha­lation in a patient with mitral regu­rgitation and severe pulmonary hype­rtension. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(4):95-95
History of anti-embolic protection in cardiac surgery. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):139-149
Chro­nic postoperative pain in cardiac surgery: analysis of quantitative sensory testing and pain history data. Russian Journal of Pain. 2025;(1):16-23
Cognitive impairment after major surgical operations. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(4-2):74-80
Risk factors of severe chylothorax after cardiac surgery in children. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(5):526-533
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of carotid Doppler parameters as predictors of fluid responsiveness after heart valve surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study enrolled 49 adults after elective heart valve surgery. On the first day after surgery, all patients underwent passive leg-raising test (PLR) during mechanical ventilation (MV) and spontaneous breathing (SB). We estimated hemodynamic parameters using prepulmonary thermodilution before and after the test. Carotid Doppler indices such as absolute (∆FTc, ms) and relative (∆FTc, %) change in corrected flow time were calculated. Responders had cardiac output (∆CO) increase >10%.

RESULTS

There was a moderate relationship between ∆CO and ∆FTc during PLR test under MV (r=0.551, p<0.0001) and SB (r=0.510, p<0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of FTc-based PLR test in mechanically ventilated patients were 87% and 70%, respectively (∆FTc threshold value 16.4 ms), during spontaneous breathing — 88% and 79%, respectively (∆FTc threshold value 19.4 ms). Similar results were obtained for the relative increase of ∆FTc (%).

CONCLUSION

The FTc-based PLR test has moderate sensitivity and specificity for analysis of fluid responsiveness after elective heart valve surgery. Further studies are required to demonstrate significant of carotid Doppler measurements as predictors of fluid responsiveness.

Keywords:

fluid responsiveness
carotid Doppler ultrasound
passive leg raising test
cardiac surgery

Authors:

Zozulya M.V.

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Lenkin A.I.

Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Received:

05.02.2024

Accepted:

08.04.2024

Close metadata

References:

  1. Monnet X, Shi R, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new? Annals of Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):46.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8
  2. Paromov KV, Volkov DA, Kirov MYu. Responsiveness to Infusion Load under Regional Anesthesia after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. General Reanimatology. 2023;19(5):31-38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2023-5-2352
  3. Heiberg J, El-Ansary D, Royse CF, Royse AG, Alsaddique AA, Canty DJ. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography: a systematic review of feasibility and impact on diagnosis, management and outcome after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:1210-1221. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13545
  4. Saugel B, Cecconi M, Hajjar LA. Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients: Available Methods and Future Directions. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2019;33(6):1742-1752. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2018.06.012
  5. Suriani I, van Houte J, de Boer EC, van Knippenberg L, Manzari S, Mischi M, Bouwman RA. Carotid Doppler ultrasound for non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring: a narrative review. Physiological Measurement. 2023;43(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac96cb
  6. Petrishchev YuI, Levit AL. Predictors of multiple organ failure after cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2022;(3):68-76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202203168
  7. Duchnowski P, Hryniewiecki T, Koźma M, Mariusz K, Piotr S. High-sensitivity troponin T is a prognostic marker of hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing valve surgery. Biomarkers in Medicine. 2018;12(12): 1303-1309. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2018-0186
  8. Devereaux PJ, Lamy A, Chan MTV; VISION Cardiac Surgery Investigators. High-Sensitivity Troponin I after Cardiac Surgery and 30-Day Mortality. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022;386(9):827-836.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000803
  9. Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C, Monnet X. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Medicine. 2009;35(1):85-90. 
  10. Brown JA, Aranda-Michel E, Kilic A, Serna-Gallegos D, Bianco V, Thoma FW, Sultan I. The impact of pulmonary artery catheter use in cardiac surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2022;164(6):1965-1973.e6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.086
  11. De Backer D, Vincent JL. Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions. Critical Care. 2018;22(43). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-1959-3
  12. De Backer D, Aissaoui N, Cecconi M, Chew MS, Denault A, Hajjar L, Hernandez G, Messina A, Myatra SN, Ostermann M, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vignon P, Vincent JL, Monnet X. How can assessing hemodynamics help to assess volume status? Intensive Care Medicine. 2022;48(10):1482-1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06808-9
  13. Beigel R, Cercek B, Arsanjani R, Siegel RJ. Echocardiography in the use of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. Journal of Critical Care. 2014; 29(1):184.e1-184.e8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.09.003
  14. Batigyan OA, Lebedeva EA, Martynov DV. Possibilities of transesophageal echocardiography for assessing the volemic status of patients during direct myocardial revascularization operations on the beating heart: a review. Annals of Critical Care. 2022;(4):88-97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474X-2021-4-88-97
  15. Smetkin AA, Hussein A, Zakharov VI, Izotova NN, Kuzkov VV, Kirov MYu. Accuracy of noninvasive measurement of cardiac output based on the estimation of pulse wave transit time during coronary artery bypass grafting on a working heart. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2016;20(2):104-110. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2016-2-104-110
  16. Shen J, Dai S, Tao X, Chen X, Xu L. Corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity of radial artery predict fluid responsiveness in gynecological surgical patients with mechanical ventilation. BMC Anesthesiology. 2022;22(1):299.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01837-9
  17. Joshi M, Dhakane P, Bhosale SJ, Phulambrikar R, Kulkarni AP. Correlation between Carotid and Brachial Artery Velocity Time Integral and Their Comparison to Pulse Pressure Variation and Stroke Volume Variation for Assessing Fluid Responsiveness. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2022;26(2):179-184.  https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24115
  18. Ma IWY, Caplin JD, Azad A, Wilson C, Fifer MA, Bagchi A, Liteplo AS, Noble VE. Correlation of carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time with invasive cardiac output measurements. Critical Ultrasound Journal. 2017;9(1):10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0065-0
  19. Roehrig C, Govier M, Robinson J, Aneman A. Carotid Doppler flowmetry correlates poorly with thermodilution cardiac output following cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2017;61(1):31-38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12822
  20. van Houte J, Raaijmaakers AE, Mooi FJ, Meijs LPB, de Boer EC, Suriani I, Houterman S, Montenij LJ, Bouwman AR. Evaluating corrected carotid flow time as a non-invasive parameter for trending cardiac output and stroke volume in cardiac surgery patients. Journal of Ultrasound. 2023;26(1):89-97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00678-z
  21. Singla D, Gupta B, Varshney P, Mangla M, Walikar BN, Jamir T. Role of carotid corrected flow time and peak velocity variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2023;76(3):183-193.  https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.22385
  22. Singer M, Allen MJ, Webb AR. Effects of alterations in left ventricular filling, contractility, and systemic vascular resistance on the ascending aortic blood velocity waveform of normal subjects. Critical Care Medicine. 1991;19:1138-1145. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199109000-00008
  23. Xu L, Dai S, Shen J, Lu C, Tang Y, Chen X. The predictive ability of carotid artery corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity measured by ultrasonography for fluid responsiveness in parturients for cesarean delivery. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2020;86(10):1039-1046. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14315-3
  24. Berekashvili LB, Yadgarov MYa, Gerasimenko ON, Koger DD, Kadantseva KK, Likhvantsev VV. Risk Assessment of Hemodynamically Significant Arrhythmias after Elective Cardiac Operations with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using the Modified Nomogram (Retrospective Study). General Reanimatology. 2021;17(6):20-26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2021-6-20-26
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.