The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Lvov I.S.

Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care

Lukyanchikov V.A.

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Grin A.A.

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care

Alekhin E.E.

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine

Roschin S.Yu.

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine

Talypov A.E.

Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergenscy Medicine

Ramazanov G.R.

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care

Krylov V.V.

A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State Medical University;
N.V. Sklifosovsky Scientific and Research Institute of Emergency Medicine

The frequency of vertebral artery sulcus ossification, grades III and IV, in patients with Kimmerle’s anomaly: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors:

Lvov I.S., Lukyanchikov V.A., Grin A.A., Alekhin E.E., Roschin S.Yu., Talypov A.E., Ramazanov G.R., Krylov V.V.

More about the authors

Read: 2932 times


To cite this article:

Lvov IS, Lukyanchikov VA, Grin AA, et al. . The frequency of vertebral artery sulcus ossification, grades III and IV, in patients with Kimmerle’s anomaly: A systematic review and meta-analysis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2022;122(9):37‑47. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202212209137

Recommended articles:

References:

  1. Kim MS. Anatomical variant of atlas: arcuate foramen, occpitalization of atlas, and defect of posterior arch of atlas. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Association. 2015;58(6):528-533.  https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.6.528
  2. Allen W. The Varieties of the Atlas in the Human Subject, and the Homologies of its Transverse Processes. J Anat Physiol. 1879;14(Pt 1):18-27. 
  3. Tubbs RS, Johnson PC, Shoja MM, et al. Foramen arcuale: anatomical study and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(1):31-34.  https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.1.6
  4. Lutsik AA, Ratkin IK, Nikitin MN. Craniovertebral injuries and diseases. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’;1988. (In Russ.).
  5. Jost GF, Dailey AT. Bow hunter’s syndrome revisited: 2 new cases and literature review of 124 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(4):E7.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14791
  6. Buna M, Coghlan W, deGruchy M, et al. Ponticles of the atlas: a review and clinical perspective. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1984;7(4):261-266. 
  7. Popelyanskiy AYa. Nevrologicheskoe proyavlenie fiksatsii sosudisto-nervnykh stvolov v anomal’noy borozde zadney dugi atlanta (anomaliya Kimmerle). S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 1981;81(7):985-989. (In Russ.).
  8. Kulagin VN, Mikhailyukova SS, Lantukh AV, et al. Kimmerle’s anomaly: aspects of diagnostics and treatment of main clinical syndromes. Pacific Medical Journal. 2013;4(54):84-87. (In Russ.).
  9. Gulyaev SA, Kulagin VN, Arkhipenko IV, Gulaeva SE. Clinical manifestations and treatment for Kimmerle anomaly. RMJ. 2013;21(16):866-868. (In Russ.).
  10. Limousin CA. Foramen arcuale and syndrome of Barre-Lieou. Its surgical treatment. International orthopaedics. 1980;4(1):19-23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00266599
  11. Lvov I, Lukianchikov V, Grin A, et al. Minimally invasive surgical treatment for Kimmerle anomaly. Journal of Craniovertebral Junction & Spine. 2017;8(4):359-363.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_73_17
  12. Lukianchikov V, Lvov I, Grin A, et al. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Vertebral Artery Compression in a Patient with One-Sided Ponticulus Posticus and Ponticulus Lateralis. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:97-102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.002
  13. Cederberg RA, Benson BW, Nunn M, English JD. Arcuate foramen: prevalence by age, gender, and degree of calcification. Clinical Orthodontics and Research. 2000;3(3):162-167.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2000.30309.x
  14. Cho YJ. Radiological analysis of ponticulus posticus in Koreans. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(1):45-49.  https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.1.45
  15. Baeesa SS, Bokhari RF, Bajunaid KM, Al-Sayyad MJ. Prevalence of the foramen arcuale of the atlas in a Saudi population. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2012;17(4):345-351. 
  16. Chitroda PK, Katti G, Baba IA, et al. Ponticulus posticus on the posterior arch of atlas, prevalence analysis in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients of gulbarga population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):3044-3047. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/6795.3847
  17. Elliott RE, Tanweer O. The prevalence of the ponticulus posticus (arcuate foramen) and its importance in the Goel-Harms procedure: meta-analysis and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(1-2):335-343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.09.014
  18. Pękala PA, Henry BM, Pękala JR, et al. Prevalence of foramen arcuale and its clinical significance: a meta-analysis of 55,985 subjects. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27(3):276-290.  https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.1.SPINE161092
  19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  20. Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Statistics Division. Accessed 23.07.21.  https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
  21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-560.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  22. Lamberty BG, Zivanović S. The retro-articular vertebral artery ring of the atlas and its significance. Acta Anat (Basel). 1973;85(1):113-122.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000143987
  23. Cakmak O, Gurdal E, Ekinci G, et al. Arcuate foramen and its clinical significance. Saudi Med J. 2005;26(9):1409-1413.
  24. Senoglu M, Gümüşalan Y, Yüksel KZ, et al. The effect of posterior bridging of C-1 on craniovertebral junction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(1):50-52.  https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.5.1.50
  25. Kim KH, Park KW, Manh TH, et al. Prevalence and Morphologic Features of Ponticulus Posticus in Koreans: Analysis of 312 Radiographs and 225 Three-dimensional CT Scans. Asian Spine J. 2007;1(1):27-31.  https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2007.1.1.27
  26. Losev RZ, Nikolenko VN, Sholomov II, et al. Diagnostics And Treatment Of Patients With Blood Circulation Insufficiency In Vertebrobasilar Bed. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2009;5(4):629-634. (In Russ.).
  27. Selby S, Garn SM, Kanareff V. The incidence and familial nature of a bony bridge on the first cervical vertebra. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1955;13(1):129-141.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330130110
  28. Pyo J, Lowman RM. The ponticulus posticus of the first cervical vertebra. Radiology. 1959;72(6):850-854.  https://doi.org/10.1148/72.6.850
  29. Kendrick GS, Biggs NL. Incidence of the ponticulus posticus of the first cervical vertebra between ages six to seventeen. Anat Rec. 1963;145:449-453.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091450308
  30. Romanus T, Tovi A. A variation of the atlas. Roentgenologic Incidence of a Bridge over the groove of the atlas for the vertebral artery. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1964;2:289-297.  https://doi.org/10.1177/028418516400200403
  31. Veleanu C, Bârzu S, Pánescu S, Udroiu C. The retrotransverse groove or canal of the atlas and its significance. Acta Anat (Basel). 1977;97(4):400-402.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000144760
  32. Farman AG, Nortjé CJ, Joubert JJ. Radiographic profile of the first cervical vertebra. J Anat. 1979;128(Pt 3):595-600. 
  33. Saunders SR, Popovich F. A family study of two skeletal variants: atlas bridging and clinoid bridging. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978;49(2):193-203.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330490207
  34. Taitz C, Nathan H. Some observations on the posterior and lateral bridge of the atlas. Acta Anat (Basel). 1986;127(3):212-217.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000146284
  35. Ruprecht A, Nashashibi I, Lambourne A. Ponticles of the atlas. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1988;17(1):67-71.  https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.1988.0009
  36. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Heck B. The quantitative anatomy of the vertebral artery groove of the atlas and its relation to the posterior atlantoaxial approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(3):320-323.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199802010-00007
  37. Mitchell J. The incidence of the lateral bridge of the atlas vertebra. J Anat. 1998;193(Pt 2):283-285.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19320283.x
  38. Tetradis S, Kantor ML. Prevalence of skeletal and dental anomalies and normal variants seen in cephalometric and other radiographs of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116(5):572-577.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70191-5
  39. Hasan M, Shukla S, Siddiqui MS, Singh D. Posterolateral tunnels and ponticuli in human atlas vertebrae. J Anat. 2001;199(Pt 3):339-343.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19930339.x
  40. Kavakli A, Aydinlioglu A, Yesilyurt H, et al. Variants and deformities of atlas vertebrae in Eastern Anatolian people. Saudi Med J. 2004;25(3):322-325. 
  41. Beck RW, Holt KR, Fox MA, Hurtgen-Grace KL. Radiographic anomalies that may alter chiropractic intervention strategies found in a New Zealand population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27(9):554-559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.10.008
  42. Young JP, Young PH, Ackermann MJ, et al. The ponticulus posticus: implications for screw insertion into the first cervical lateral mass. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(11):2495-2498.
  43. Paraskevas G, Papaziogas B, Tsonidis C, Kapetanos G. Gross morphology of the bridges over the vertebral artery groove on the atlas. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27(2):129-136.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0300-9
  44. Simsek S, Yigitkanli K, Comert A, et al. Posterior osseous bridging of C1. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15(6):686-688.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2007.06.004
  45. Krishnamurthy A, Nayak SR, Khan S, et al. Arcuate foramen of atlas: incidence, phylogenetic and clinical significance. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2007;48(3):263-266. 
  46. Gupta T. Quantitative anatomy of vertebral artery groove on the posterior arch of atlas in relation to spinal surgical procedures. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008;30(3):239-242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0313-x
  47. Yamaguchi S, Eguchi K, Kiura Y, et al. Posterolateral protrusion of the vertebral artery over the posterior arch of the atlas: quantitative anatomical study using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(2):167-174.  https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/9/8/167
  48. Hong JT, Lee SW, Son BC, et al. Analysis of anatomical variations of bone and vascular structures around the posterior atlantal arch using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(3):230-236.  https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/8/3/230
  49. Awadalla AM, Fetouh FA. Morphometric analysis of the vertebral artery groove of the first cervical vertebra (atlas). Pan Arab J Neurosurg. 2009;13(66):71. 
  50. Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. Skeletal anomalies and normal variants in patients with palatally displaced canines. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(4):727-732.  https://doi.org/10.2319/082408-448.1
  51. Kaur J, Yadav Y, Agarwal S. Bony ponticles and bridges on the posterior arch of the atlas vertebra: their phylogeny, developmental basis & clinical significance. Int Med J. 2010;17(229):235. 
  52. Schilling J, Schilling A, Galdames IS. Ponticulus posticus on the Posterior Arch of Atlas, Prevalence Analysis in Asymptomatic Patients. International Journal of Morphology. 2010;28(1):317-322.  10.4067/S0717-95022010000100046
  53. Sharma V, Chaudhary D, Mitra R. Prevalence of ponticulus posticus in Indian orthodontic patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(5):277-283.  https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/16271087
  54. Agrawal R, Ananthi KS, Agrawal S, Usha K. Posterior Arch of Atlas with Abnormal Foramina in South Indians. Journal of Anatomical Society of India. 2012;61(1):30-32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2778(12)80008-6
  55. Yeom JS, Kafle D, Nguyen NQ, et al. Routine insertion of the lateral mass screw via the posterior arch for C1 fixation: feasibility and related complications. Spine J. 2012;12(6):476-483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.06.010
  56. Gupta C, Radhakrishnan P, Souza D. A quantitative analysis of atlas vertebrae and its abnormalities. Journal of Morphological Sciences. 2013;30:77-81. 
  57. Gopal K, Kumar V, Kumar V, Agarwal W. Anatomical variations in conduit of vertebral artery in atlas. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2013;2(42):8030-8037.
  58. Elgafy H, Pompo F, Vela R, Elsamaloty HM. Ipsilateral arcuate foramen and high-riding vertebral artery: implication on C1-C2 instrumentation. Spine J. 2014;14(7):1351-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.054
  59. Wakao N, Takeuchi M, Nishimura M, et al. Vertebral artery variations and osseous anomaly at the C1-2 level diagnosed by 3D CT angiography in normal subjects. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(10):843-849.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1399-y
  60. Geist JR, Geist SM, Lin LM. A cone beam CT investigation of ponticulus posticus and lateralis in children and adolescents. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(5):20130451. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130451
  61. Mudit G, Srinivas K, Satheesha R. Retrospective analysis of ponticulus posticus in Indian orthodontic patients-a lateral cephalometric study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014;24(4):285-290.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v24i4.2
  62. Bayrakdar IS, Miloglu O, Altun O, et al. Cone beam computed tomography imaging of ponticulus posticus: prevalence, characteristics, and a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118(6):e210-219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.09.014
  63. Khanfour AA, El Sekily NM. Relation of the vertebral artery segment from C1 to C2 vertebrae: An anatomical study. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2015;51(2):143-151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2014.05.007
  64. Gibelli D, Cappella A, Cerutti E, et al. Prevalence of ponticulus posticus in a Northern Italian orthodontic population: a lateral cephalometric study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016;38(3):309-312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1554-0
  65. Chen CH, Chen YK, Wang CK. Prevalence of ponticuli posticus among patients referred for dental examinations by cone-beam CT. Spine J. 2015;15(6):1270-1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.031
  66. Sekerci AE, Soylu E, Arikan MP, Aglarci OS. Is there a relationship between the presence of ponticulus posticus and elongated styloid process? Clin Imaging. 2015;39(2):220-224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.11.016
  67. Aktas AR, Erkmen C, Ozdol C, et al. Variations of Sulcus Arteria Vertebralis and Correlation with Clinical Symptoms. J Clin Anal Med. 2015;6(6):830-834.  https://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.3725
  68. Perez IE, Chaves AK. Frequency of Ponticulus posticus, Sella turcica bridge and clinoid enlargement in cleft lip and palate Peruvian patients: A comparative study with non-cleft patients. Int J Morphol. 2015;33(3):895-901.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000300015
  69. Tambawala SS, Karjodkar FR, Sansare K, et al. Prevalence of Ponticulus Posticus on Lateral Cephalometric Radiographs, its Association with Cervicogenic Headache and a Review of Literature. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:566-575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.030
  70. Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M. Prevalence of ponticulus posticus among patients with different dental malocclusions by digital lateral cephalogram: a comparative study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017;39(3):293-297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1728-4
  71. Lee CK, Tan TS, Chan C, Kwan MK. Is C1 lateral mass screw placement safe for the Chinese, Indians, and Malays? An analysis of 180 computed tomography scans. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):2309499017692683. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017692683
  72. Buyuk SK, Sekerci AE, Benkli YA, Ekizer A. A survey of ponticulus posticus: Radiological analysis of atlas in an orthodontic population based on cone-beam computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(1):106-110.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.178916
  73. Giri J, Pokharel PR, Gyawali R. How common is ponticulus posticus on lateral cephalograms? BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):172. Published 2017 Apr 28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2494-z
  74. Vanek P, Bradac O, de Lacy P, et al. Vertebral artery and osseous anomalies characteristic at the craniocervical junction diagnosed by CT and 3D CT angiography in normal Czech population: analysis of 511 consecutive patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40(3):369-376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0784-x
  75. Bayrakdar IŞ, Yasa Y, Duman ŞB, et al. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of ponticulus posticus in patients with cleft lip and palate: a retrospective radio-anatomic study. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(1):72-78.  https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2017.0076
  76. IIsaji T, Yasuda M, Kawaguchi R, et al. Posterior inferior cerebellar artery with an extradural origin from the V3 segment: higher incidence on the nondominant vertebral artery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(2):154-159.  https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2017.0076
  77. Arslan D, Ozer MA, Govsa F, Kıtıs O. The Ponticulus Posticus as Risk Factor for Screw Insertion into the First Cervical Lateral Mass. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:579-585.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.100
  78. Putrino A, Leonardi RM, Barbato E, et al. The Association between Ponticulus Posticus and Dental Agenesis: A Retrospective Study. Open Dent J. 2018;12:510-519.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010510
  79. Lo Giudice A, Caccianiga G, Crimi S, et al. Frequency and type of ponticulus posticus in a longitudinal sample of nonorthodontically treated patients: relationship with gender, age, skeletal maturity, and skeletal malocclusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;126(3):291-297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.05.001
  80. Saleh A, Gruber J, Bakhsh W, et al. How Common Is the Ponticulus Posticus?: A Computed Tomography Based Analysis of 2917 Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(8):436-441.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002400
  81. Tripodi D, Tieri M, Demartis P, et al. Ponticulus posticus: clinical and CBCT analysis in a young Italian population. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(3):219-223.  https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.03.10
  82. Ankith NV, Avinash M, Shetty AP, et al. Congenital Osseous Anomalies of the Cervical Spine: Occurrence, Morphological Characteristics, Embryological Basis and Clinical Significance: A Computed Tomography Based Study. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(4):535-543.  https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0260
  83. Dadgar S, Alimohamadi M, Rajabi N, et al. Associations among palatal impaction of canine, sella turcica bridging, and ponticulus posticus (atlas arcuate foramen). Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43(1):93-99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02548-x
  84. Ozturk T, Atilla AO, Yagci A. Cervicovertebral anomalies and/or normal variants in patients with congenitally bilateral absent maxillary lateral incisors. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(3):383-389.  https://doi.org/10.2319/061919-418.1

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.