The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kotov S.V.

Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Slyunkova E.V.

Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Borisova V.A.

Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Isakova E.V.

Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute

Effectiveness of brain—computer interfaces and cognitive training using computer technologies in restoring cognitive functions in patients after stroke

Authors:

Kotov S.V., Slyunkova E.V., Borisova V.A., Isakova E.V.

More about the authors

Read: 3362 times


To cite this article:

Kotov SV, Slyunkova EV, Borisova VA, Isakova EV. Effectiveness of brain—computer interfaces and cognitive training using computer technologies in restoring cognitive functions in patients after stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2022;122(12‑2):67‑75. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202212212267

Recommended articles:
Biofeedback in complex therapy of pain syndromes. Russian Journal of Pain. 2025;(2):70-75
Effe­cts of sema­glutide on mental health. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(9):28-36
Move­ment image training and brain-computer inte­rface in cognitive reha­bilitation. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(11):27-35
Classification, diagnosis and therapy of atte­ntion defi­cit hype­ractivity diso­rder. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(11):62-68
Brain aging: mole­cular targets of gero­protection and prevention stra­tegies. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(11):132-139

References:

  1. Levin OS. Diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment and dementia in clinical practice. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2019. (In Russ.).
  2. Restorative neurology: Innovative technologies in neurorehabilitation. Ed L.A. Chernikova. M.: MIA; 2016. (In Russ.).
  3. Kaplan AYa, Zhigulskaya DD, Kiriyanov DA. Studying the ability to control human phantom fingers in P300 brain-computer interface. Vestnik RGMU. 2016;(2):26-29. (In Russ.).
  4. Kotov SV, Biryukova EV, Kondur AA, et al. Dynamics of the bioelectric activity of the cerebral cortex after a stroke with imagining the movement of the ipsilesional hand. Farmateka. 2021;28(3):68-72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2021.3.68-72
  5. Jirayucharoensak S, Israsena P, Pan-Ngum S, et al. A game-based neurofeedback training system to enhance cognitive performance in healthy elderly subjects and in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2019;19(4):347-360.  https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S189047
  6. Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, et al. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain—computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke. 2008;(39):910-917.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505313
  7. Nicolas-Alonso LE, Gomez Gil J. Brain computer interfaces, a review. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(2):1211-1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120201211
  8. Sitaram R, Caria A, Birbaumer N. Hemodynamic brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation. Neural Networks. 2009;22(9):1320-1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2009.05.009
  9. Bobrov PD, Isaev MR, Korshakov AV, et al. Sources of electrophysiological and foci of hemodynamic brain activity most relevant for controlling a hybrid brain—computer interface based on classification of eeg patterns and near-infrared spectrography signals during motor imagery. Human Physiology. 2016;42(3):12-24. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0131164616030048
  10. Hong KS, Khan MJ. Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Techniques for Improved Classification Accuracy and Increased Number of Commands: A Review. Front Neurorobot. 2017;11:35.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00035
  11. Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva F.H. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999;110:1842-1857.
  12. Jeon Y, Nam CS, Kim Y-J, Whang MC. Event-related (De)synchronization (ERD/ERS) during motor imagery tasks: Implications for brain—computer interfaces. Int J Industrial Ergonomics. 2011;41:428-436. 
  13. Kotov SV, Turbina LG, Kondur AA, et al. Recovery Dynamics in Patients with Poststroke Motor Disorders after Multiple Courses of Neurorehabilitation Using an Exoskeleton Controlled by a Brain—Computer Interface. I.P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 2017;67(4):445-452. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-018-0671-8
  14. Kim T, Kim S, Lee B. Effects of Action Observational Training Plus Brain-Computer Interface-Based Functional Electrical Stimulation on Paretic Arm Motor Recovery in Patient with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Occup Ther Int. 2016;23(1):39-47.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1403
  15. Kondur AA, Biryukova EV, Frolov AA, et al. Rehabilitation of the arm motor function in poststroke patients with an exoskeleton-controlling brain—computer interface: effect of repeated hospitalizations. Human Physiology. 2020;46(3):99-110. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013116462003008X
  16. Kotov SV, Biryukova EV, Turbina LG, et al. The study of memory, spatial thinking and praxis in rehabilitation of post-stroke patients using «BCI +Exoskeleton». Vestnik Vosstanovitel’noi Meditsiny. 2017;78(2):101-106. (In Russ.).
  17. Farwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;70(6):510-523.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6
  18. Kleih SC, Gottschalt L, Teichlein E, Weilbach FX. Toward a P300 Based Brain-Computer Interface for Aphasia Rehabilitation after Stroke: Presentation of Theoretical Considerations and a Pilot Feasibility Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;11(10):547.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00547
  19. Pronina AS, Grigoryan RK, Kaplan AYa. Objective eye movements during typing in p300 BCI: the effect of stimuli size and spacing. Bulletin of the moscow university. Issue 14: Psychology. 2018;4:120-134. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2018.04.120
  20. Ganin IP, Kim SA, Liburkina SP, et al. Text typing in patients with post-stroke afasia in the P300 brain-computer interface based «NEUROCHAT» complex. I.P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 2020;70(4):435-445. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044467720040036
  21. Kotov SV, Romanova MV, Kondur AA, et al. Reorganization of Bioelectrical Activity in the Neocortex after Stroke by Rehabilitation Using a Brain—Computer Interface Controlling a Wrist Exoskeleton. I.P. Pavlov Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 2020;70(2):218-231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-020-01017-7
  22. Kotov SV, Isakova EV, Slyun’kova EV. Usage of brain — computer interface+exoskeleton technology as a part of complex multimodal stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with stroke. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2019;119(12-2):37-42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201911912237
  23. Neuropsychiatric disorders: diagnostic tests. Zakharov V.V., Voznesenskaya T.G. Ed. N.N. Yakhno. 2nd ed. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2016. (In Russ.).
  24. Cova I, Mele F, Zerini F, et al. The Clock Drawing Test as a predictor of cognitive decline in non-demented stroke patients. J Neurol. 2022;269(1):342-349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10637-z
  25. Gomez-Pilar J, Corralejo R, Nicolas-Alonso LF, et al. Neurofeedback training with a motor imagery-based BCI: neurocognitive improvements and EEG changes in the elderly. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54(11):1655-1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1454-4
  26. Prokopenko SV, Bezdenezhnykh AF, Mozheĭko EIu, Zubrickaya EM. A comparative clinical study of the efficacy of computer cognitive training in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairments. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2017;117(8-2):32-36. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20171178232-36
  27. Prokopenko SV, Dyadyuk TV, Mozheiko EYu, et al. Use of computer stimulating programs in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2017;9(3):48-53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2017-3-48-53
  28. Tian R, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Cognitive training program improves cognitive ability and daily living ability in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;34(6):56-61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-02015-6
  29. Melnikova EV, Builova TV, Bodrova RA, et al. Ivanova G.E. Use of the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) in outpatient and inpatient medical rehabilitation: instruction for specialists. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017;6(82):2-77. (In Russ.).

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.