The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kravchik M.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Novikov I.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Kuznetsov S.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Subbot A.M.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Osipyan G.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Pak O.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Novikova A.I.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Pateyuk L.S.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Bilyalov A.I.

OOO LIFT CENTR, Moscow, Russia;
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russia;
National Medical Research Centre of Cardiology Named after Academician E.I. Chazov, Moscow, Russia

Gusev O.A.

OOO LIFT CENTR, Moscow, Russia;
Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

Avetisov S.E.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Yusef Yu.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Moscow, Russia

Next-generation pharmaceutically acceptable vehicles for eye drops (preliminary report)

Authors:

Kravchik M.V., Novikov I.A., Kuznetsov S.V., Subbot A.M., Osipyan G.A., Pak O.A., Novikova A.I., Pateyuk L.S., Bilyalov A.I., Gusev O.A., Avetisov S.E., Yusef Yu.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(1): 45‑53

Read: 385 times


To cite this article:

Kravchik MV, Novikov IA, Kuznetsov SV, et al. Next-generation pharmaceutically acceptable vehicles for eye drops (preliminary report). Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(1):45‑53. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202614201145

References:

  1. Lieleg O, Ribbeck K. Biological hydrogels as selective diffusion barriers. Trends in Cell Biology. 2011;21(9):543-551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.06.002
  2. Leal J, Smyth HDC, Ghosh D. Physicochemical properties of mucus and their impact on transmucosal drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2017;532(1):555-572.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.018
  3. Mitra AK, Mikkelson TJ. Mechanism of transcorneal permeation of pilocarpine. J Pharm Sci. 1988 Sep;77(9):771-775.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600770911
  4. Rodríguez I, Vázquez JA, Pastrana L, Khutoryanskiy VV. Enhancement and inhibition effects on the corneal permeability of timolol maleate: polymers, cyclodextrins and chelating agents. Int J Pharm. 2017;529(1-2):168-177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.06.075
  5. Ghelardi E, Tavanti A, Celandroni F, Lupetti A, Blandizzi C, Boldrini E, Campa M, Senesi S. Effect of a novel mucoadhesive polysaccharide obtained from tamarind seeds on the intraocular penetration of gentamicin and ofloxacin in rabbits. J Antim Chemother. 2000;46(5):831-834.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/46.5.831
  6. Prausnitz MR, Noonan JS. Permeability of cornea, sclera, and conjunctiva: a literature analysis for drug delivery to the eye. J Pharm Scienc. 1998;87(12): 1479-1488. https://doi.org/10.1021/js9802594
  7. Shen L, Fang G, Tang B, Zhu Q. Enhanced topical corticosteroids delivery to the eye: a trade-off in strategy choice. J Contr Release. 2021;339:91-113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.09.022
  8. Santos G, Delgado E, Silva B, Braz BS, Gonçalves L. Topical ocular drug delivery: the impact of permeation enhancers. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(4):447.  https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17040447
  9. Schipper NG, Olsson S, Hoogstraate JA, deBoer AG, Varum KM, Artursson P. Chitosans as absorption enhancers for poorly absorbable drugs 2: mechanism of absorption enhancement. Pharm Research. 1997;14:923-929.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012160102740
  10. Grass GM, Wood RW, Robinson JR. Effects of calcium chelating agents on corneal permeability. Inv Ophthal Vis Science. 1985;26(1):110-113. 
  11. Bhaskar KR, Gong DH, Bansil R, Pajevic S, Hamilton JA. Turner BS, LaMont JT. Profound increase in viscosity and aggregation of pig gastric mucin at low pH. Am J Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 1991;261(5):G827-G832. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1991.261.5.G827
  12. Lieleg O, Vladescu I, Ribbeck K. Characterization of particle translocation through mucin hydrogels. Biophysical Journal. 20105;98(9):1782-1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.012
  13. Tam PY, Verdugo P. Control of mucus hydration as a Donnan equilibrium process. Nature. 1981;292(5821):340-342.  https://doi.org/10.1038/292340a0
  14. Carlson TL, Lock JY, Carrier RL. Engineering the mucus barrier. Annual Rev Biom Engin. 2018;20:197-220.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121156
  15. Hanakawa Y, Selwood T, Woo D, Lin C, Schechter NM, Stanley JR. Calcium-dependent conformation of desmoglein 1 is required for its cleavage by exfoliative toxin. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121(2):383-389.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12362.x
  16. Avetisov SÉ, Safonova TN, Novikov IA, Pateiuk LS, Griboedova IG. Acidity and buffering system of the ocular surface. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2014;133(5):5. (In Russ.).
  17. Coles WH, Jaros PA. Dynamics of ocular surface pH. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1984;68(8):549-552.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.68.8.549
  18. Garcia-Valldecabres M, Lopez-Alemany A, Refojo MF. pH stability of ophthalmic solutions. Optometry. 2004 Mar;75(3):161-168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-1839(04)70035-4
  19. Giovanoni RL, inventor; CooperVision Pharmaceuticals Inc, assignee. Ophthalmic solutions with buffer system for ocular administration. European patent EP0589020A1. March 30, 1994.
  20. Reznik N, Gallo AD, Rush KW, Javitt G, Fridmann-Sirkis Y, Ilani T, Nairner NA, Fishilevich S, Gokhman D, Chacón KN, Franz KJ, Fass D. Intestinal mucin is a chaperone of multivalent copper. Cell. 2022 ;185(22):4206-4215.e11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.021
  21. Avetisov SÉ, Trufanov SV, Novikov IA, Subbot AM, Fedorov AA. SEM visualization of corneal epithelium through lanthanoid staining based on Ca/Nd isomorphous substitution in Ca-dependent molecular systems. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2016;132(6):11-19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2016132611-19

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.