The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Erichev V.P.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Vitkov A.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Antonov A.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Asinovskova I.I.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Poleva R.P.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Role of point-by-point light sensitivity in the assessment of glaucoma progression

Authors:

Erichev V.P., Vitkov A.A., Antonov A.A., Asinovskova I.I., Poleva R.P.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;140(2‑2): 34‑42

Read: 1439 times


To cite this article:

Erichev VP, Vitkov AA, Antonov AA, Asinovskova II, Poleva RP. Role of point-by-point light sensitivity in the assessment of glaucoma progression. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;140(2‑2):34‑42. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414002234

Recommended articles:
The resu­lts of fistulizing glaucoma surgeries in pseudophackic patients. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):45-52
Electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis and moni­toring of glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(4):102-109
Modern devi­ces for microinvasive glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(5):101-108

References:

  1. Bulakh IA, Zavadski PC, Lanin SN, Zvereva OG, Vitkov AA, Gaponko OV, Gorodnichii VV, Diordiichuk SV, Dorofeev DA, Kuroyedov AV, Seleznev AV, Fomin NE, Shalygina EL. Clinical features of the progression of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with a burdened family history. National Journal glaucoma. 2023;22(2):44-54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-2-44-54
  2. Erichev VP, Egorov EA. On pathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2014;130(6):98-105. (In Russ.).
  3. Nesterov AP, Alekseev VN, Alekseev IB, Amirov AN, Astakhov YuS, Balalin SV, et al. National guidelines for glaucoma. M. 2015. (In Russ.).
  4. Ekgardt VF, Dorofeev DA. Structural and functional characteristics of patients with simple primary and pseudoexfoliation open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Part 1. National Journal glaucoma. 2018;17(1):55-69. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2018.01.06
  5. Ekgardt VF, Dorofeev DA. The structural-functional and hemodynamic features in patients with simple and pseudoexfoliative open-angle glaucoma and ophthalmic hypertension in a model of glaucoma development prognosis. Part 3. National Journal glaucoma. 2018;17(4):3-14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2018.04.01
  6. Dorofeev DA, Erichev VP, Kirilik EV, Kokorin IV, Rakova PA, Solovieva OB, Tsyganov AZ, Chemyakina AS, Ekgardt VF. Perimetry criteria for assessing the effectiveness of retinoprotective therapy. Russian Open Medical Journal. 2022;11:e0109.
  7. Erichev VP, Volzhanin AV. The impact of glaucoma and anti-glaucoma surgery on the quality of life of patients. Clinical ophthalmology. 2022;22(1): 44-50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2022-22-1-44-50
  8. Antonov AA, Vostrukhin SV, Volzhanin AV, Vitkov AA, Akimov AM, Asinovskova II. The effect of prostaglandin analogues on intraocular pressure fluctuations with changes in body position. Clinical ophthalmology. 2022;22(2):103-107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2022-22-2-103-107
  9. Antonov AA, Kozlova IV, Vitkov AA. Maximum medical therapy for glaucoma — what is in our arsenal? National Journal glaucoma. 2020;19(2):51-58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.02.06
  10. Avdeev RV, Alexandrov AS, Bakunina NA, Basinsky AS, Brezhnev AYu, Gazizova IR, Galimova AB, Garkavenko VV, Getmanova AM, Gorodnichy VV, Gusarevitch AA, Dorofeev DA, Zavadsky PC, Zakhidov AB, Zvereva OG, Isakov IN, Kamenskih ID, Karimov UR, Kondrakova IV, Kuroyedov AV, Lanin SN, Lovpache DN, Loskutov IA, Molchanova EV, Nagornova ZM, Onufriychuk ON, Petrov SYu, Rozhko YuI, Seleznev AV, Khohlova AS, Shaposhnikova IV, Shahalova AP, Shevchuk RV. Structural and functional diagnostic criteria in assessing the probability of suspected glaucoma and the early-stage glaucoma. Medical and Biological Problems of Life Activity. 2017;(1):105-117. (In Russ.).
  11. Erichev VP, Antonov AA, Vitkov AA, Grigoryan LA. Static automated perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Part 1: Basic principles. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2021;137(5-2):281-288. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2021137052281
  12. Erichev VP, Antonov AA, Vitkov AA, Grigoryan LA. Static automated perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Part 2: Research protocol, glaucoma classifications, perimetric defects through the prism of structural-functional correlation. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2021;137(5-2):289-299. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2021137052289
  13. Erichev VP, Panyushkina LA, Ronzina IA. Comparative analysis and diagnostic value of static perimetry and electrophysiological studies in glaucoma and Alzheimer’s disease. National Journal glaucoma. 2016;15(2):11-18. (In Russ.).
  14. Simakova IL, Sukhinin MV, Serdukova SA. The effectiveness of various methods of computerized perimetry in primary open-angle glaucoma. Part 1. National Journal glaucoma. 2016;15(1):25-36. (In Russ.).
  15. Simakova IL, Sukhinin MV, Sobolev AF, Serdukova SA. The effectiveness of various methods of computerized perimetry in primary open-angle glaucoma. Part 2. National Journal glaucoma. 2016;15(2):44-53. (In Russ.).
  16. Nesterov AP, Egorov EA. Classification of glaucoma. Clinical ophthalmology. 2001;2(2):35-37. (In Russ.).
  17. Hodapp E, Parrish R, Anderson D. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc., 1993;204. 
  18. Antonov AA, Karlova EV, Brezhnev AYu, Dorofeev DA. Current state of ophthalmic tonometry. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2020;136(6):100-107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136061100
  19. Bubnova IA, Asatryan SV. Biomechanical properties of the cornea and tonometry measurements. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2019;135(4):27-32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913504127
  20. Volkova NV, Iureva TN, Grishchuk AS, Mikhalevich IM. Correlations and correction factors in different types of tonometry. Biomechanics and biogeometry of fibrous membrane of the eye. Report 2. National Journal glaucoma. 2016;15(1):37-45. (In Russ.).
  21. Harrington do. The bjerrum scotoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1964;62: 324-348. PMID: 14269898; PMCID: PMC1310164 

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.