Influence of modern dental materials on the oral mucosa

The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Search result: 0

Kochurova E.V.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Nikolenko V.N.

Chair of Normal Anatomy, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Gavrushova L.V.

V.I. Razumovskij Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, Russia

Mukhanov A.A.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Influence of modern dental materials on the oral mucosa

Authors:

Kochurova E.V., Nikolenko V.N., Gavrushova L.V., Mukhanov A.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2020;99(2): 110‑113

DOI: 10.17116/stomat202099021110

Views: 3371

Downloaded: 180

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Kochurova EV, Nikolenko VN, Gavrushova LV, Mukhanov AA. Influence of modern dental materials on the oral mucosa. Stomatology. 2020;99(2):110‑113. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202099021110

Подписка 2025-2 (Stomatology)

Close metadata

This article provides the current data of the modern literature on the question of the biocompatibility of dental materials, their influence on the local immune homeostasis of the oral cavity; influence of the method of transmission of masticatory load on the tissues and organs of the oral cavity. Thus, when installing the seal, the choice of material, the localization of carious lesions, and when prosthetics — the choice of material of the prosthetic structure and the method of transfer of chewing load is important. It should be understood that the reaction of the mucous membrane can be not only in the area of direct contact with the dental material, but also appear in remote areas of the oral mucosa.

Keywords:

dental status

materials

saliva

mucosa

biomarkers

Authors:

Kochurova E.V.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Nikolenko V.N.

Chair of Normal Anatomy, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Gavrushova L.V.

V.I. Razumovskij Saratov State Medical University, Saratov, Russia

Mukhanov A.A.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

List of references:

Sementsova EA, Zhegalina NM, Mandra YuV, Beresneva OJ, Vlasova MI. Cytomorfometric research of influence of filling materials on oral cavity mucosa. Problemy stomatologii. 2010; 5:4-7 (In Russ.).
Syed M, Chopra R, Sachdev V. Allergic Reactions to Dental Materials-A Systematic Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):04-9.
Gimaletdinova AM, Saleeva GT, Boychuk NV, Abdul’yanov VA, Saleev RA. Histologic investigation of cytotoxicity of nanocomposite particles used for direct restorations in dentistry in rat models. Kazanskii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2017; 98(5):747-752 (In Russ.).
Couch Y, Anthony DC, Trofimov A, Lesch KP, Markova N, Steinbusch HW, Chekhonin V, Schroeter C, Lesch CP, Strekalova S. Low-dose lipopolysaccharide (lps) inhibits aggressive and augments depressive behaviours in a chronic mild stress model in mice. J Neuroinflammat. 2016;13(1):108.
Grizodub DV. Assessment of changes in the structure of epithelium of the oral mucosa in case of intolerance to dentures. Laboratornaya diagnostika Vostochnaya Evropa. 2016;5(3):388-396. (In Russ.).
Zholudev DS, Grigorev SS. Definition of influence on the patients organisms of new ceramic material based on aluminum oxide by the express diagnostics of oral mucosa reactivity. Institut stomatologii. 2014;4(65):90-93. (In Russ.).
Yesensky JA, Hasina R, Wroblewski KE, Bellairs J, Gooi Z, Saloura V, Cipriani NA, Vokes EE, Portugal LG, Seiwert TY, Blair ED, Agrawal N. Role of dental hardware in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in the low-risk nonsmoker nondrinker population. Head Neck. 2018;40(4):784-792.
Urukov YuN, Moskovskiy AV, Vokulova YuA. Diseases of the oral mucosa by materials dentures. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015; 6:50. (In Russ.).
Peeters MS, Schroeter AL, Van Hale HM, Broadbent JC. Pacemaker contact sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis. 1984; 11(4):214-218.
Mitchell DL, Synnott SA, Van Dercreek JA. Tissue reaction involving an intraoral skin graft and CP titanium abutments: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5(1):79-84.
Nawaz F, Wall BM. Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: suspected association with titanium bioprosthesis. Am J Med Sci. 2007; 334(3):215-218.
Müller K, Valentine-Thon E. Hypersensitivity to titanium: clinical and laboratory evidence. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2006; 27(suppl 1):31-35.
Gvetadze SR, Xiong P, Li J, Lv M, Li J, Yang X, Ilkaev KD, Sun J. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of an enlarged cervical lymph node in a patient with oropharyngeal cancer: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017; 124(5):495-499.
Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19(8):823-835.
Usimbekova GM, Kubzhasarova GU. The effect of thermoplastic and acrylic materials on the oral mucosa. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamentalnyh issledovanii. 2014; 3(1):123-124. (In Russ.).
Ignatiev SV, Pervov YuYu, Gvetadze RSh, Reva GV, Frolov AV. The state of mucosal immune homeostasis depending on materials used in dental prostheses supported by tooth implants. Tihookeanskii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2013; 1(51):29-31. (In Russ.).
Tregubov ID, Mazharov VN, Tregubov SI, Maglakelidze VV, Goncharova OV. Use of thermoplastic materials in orthopedic dentistry for the treatment of mucous membrane diseases in the oral cavity. Parodontologiya. 2010;15(3): 59-61. (In Russ.).
Bocharov VS, Moskvin YuN, Kim AR. Influence of basic materials of demountable prosthesis on the immune homeostasis parameters of a mucous membrane of a mouth. Tihookeanskii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2014; 3(57):62-64. (In Russ.).
Kudasova EO, Vlasova LF, Semenov DE, Lushnikova EL. Comparative Analysis of Structural Response s of Rat Subcutaneous Fat on the Implantation of Samples of Polymethyl Methacrylate with Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surface. Bjulleten’ eksperimental’noi biologii i meditsiny. 2016; 162(11):645-648. (In Russ.).
Kudasova EO, Kochurova EV, Vasilieva TM, Nekludova MV, Myasnikov VA, Hein AM. Effect of polymer prosthetic construction treated with glow-discharge plasma on oral mucosa (clinical case). Opuholi golovy i shei. 2017; 7(3):115-120. (In Russ.).
Karpuk IYu. The value of matrix metalloproteinases-8 and -9 in the development of allergopathology of the oral mucosa caused by intolerance to denture materials. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2015; 14(2):89-96. (In Russ.).
Nesterov AM. Prevention of prosthetic stomatitis microbial etiology. Ural’skii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2015;1(124):30-35. (In Russ.).
Litvinova VV. Peculiarities of diagnostics of intolerance to construction yard-materials of orthopedic structures. Mezhdunarodnyi studencheskii nauchnyi vestnik. 2016; 2:53. (In Russ.).
Tsuchiya H, Hoshino Y, Tajima K, Takagi N. Leaching and cytotoxicity of formaldehyde and methyl methacrylate from acrylic resin denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71(6):618-624.
Leggat PA, Kedjarune U. Toxicity of methyl methacrylate in dentistry. Int Dent J. 2003;53(3):126-131.

Close metadata

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Registration

Last Name

Name

Middle Name

E-mail

Phone

Address

Country

Zip

City

Region

Street

Home

Apartmen

Legal entity name

ИНН

КПП

Password

Password

Repeat password

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.