Aim — to optimize surgical care for the hemorrhagic colorectal cancer. Material and methods. 77 patients diagnosed with hemorrhagic colorectal cancer were reviewed: 9 patients of them were efficaciously treated with conservative therapy (I group); 47 — underwent successful endoscopic coagulation (I); 4 — arterial embolization (I), 2 — ligation of internal iliac arteries (I), 15 — acute resection (II group). 20 of 62 patients I group underwent plan surgery and radiation or chemotherapy during 7—10 days after hemostasis and normalization hemoglobin. The 3-year cumulative survival after resections (acute versus plan) was plotted on a Kaplan—Meier chart in 31 patients. Results. Complications and postoperative mortality was significantly higher after acute resection (II group) compared with plan resection (I): 33,3% vs 20%; 15% vs 5%, respectively. The survival rate was higher after plan than acute resections: 0,8882 and 0,3571, respectively. Conclusion. Acute surgery for hemorrhagic colorectal cancer should only be carried out by appropriately trained surgeons in multi-specialty hospital. Endoscopy and arterial embolization are the most effective means of successfully controlling hemorrhage while minimizing potential complications. A bridging strategy may be a valid alternative in some of patients with hemorrhagic colorectal cancer, because a significantly lower postoperative mortality rate.