The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Agaeva Kh.A.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Khvan D.S.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Sirota D.A.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Zhulkov M.O.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Bozorov S.Sh.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Chernyavskiy A.M.

National Medical Research Center

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: history and perspectives

Authors:

Agaeva Kh.A., Khvan D.S., Sirota D.A., Zhulkov M.O., Bozorov S.Sh., Chernyavskiy A.M.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2023;16(1): 7‑11

DOI: 10.17116/kardio2023160117

Read: 2891 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

MINIMALLY INVASIVE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: HISTORY AND PERSPECTIVES
MINIMALLY INVASIVE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: HISTORY AND PERSPECTIVES

To cite this article:

Agaeva KhA, Khvan DS, Sirota DA, Zhulkov MO, Bozorov SSh, Chernyavskiy AM. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: history and perspectives. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2023;16(1):7‑11. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio2023160117

Подписка 2026 Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Strain echo­cardiography for perioperative asse­ssment of the left ventricle and left atrium in patients unde­rgoing coro­nary artery bypass surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(3):269-279
Opti­mal cardioplegia for coro­nary artery bypass grafting in patients with heart failure: a randomized study. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(4):405-411
Predictors of acute kidney disease in patients with stable angina after coro­nary artery bypass grafting. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(4):412-417
Cognitive reha­bilitation technology using a combination of postural training and simu­ltaneous cognitive task in prevention of cognitive impairment after coro­nary artery bypass grafting. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(4):418-427
Hemo­dynamic para­meters of venous return and their role in asse­ssment of fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(2):6-12
In-hospital resu­lts of coro­nary artery bypass grafting in patients with coro­nary artery disease and unve­rified distal coro­nary bed. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(1):81-89
Cognitive impairment after major surgical operations. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(4-2):74-80
Factors dete­rmining the effe­ctiveness of various anti­thrombotic therapy regi­mens after coro­nary artery bypass surgery in patients with diffuse lesions and small diameter of coro­nary arte­ries: a 12-month prospective follow-up. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(3):25-35
Computer cognitive training for prevention of postoperative cognitive dysfunction after simu­ltaneous coro­nary artery bypass grafting and caro­tid artery surgery: a pilot study. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(3):54-61
Quality of life within 6 months after coro­nary artery bypass grafting. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(3):62-71
Abstract:

The review is devoted to history of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery, such as MIDCAB and MICS CABG. Attention is focused on key issues and criteria for selecting patients for CABG via anterolateral mini-thoracotomy. The advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery are analyzed in comparison with classical coronary artery bypass grafting and hybrid approach. The current issues of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery and the ways for their solution are analyzed in detail. The authors conclude that MICS CABG is feasible and can make multi-vessel minimally invasive coronary surgery safe, effective and widely available in appropriate selection of patients, adequate equipment and sufficient surgical experience.

Keywords:

coronary artery bypass grafting
MIDCAB
multiple coronary artery bypass grafting through the left-sided anterolateral mini-thoracotomy
MICS CABG

Authors:

Agaeva Kh.A.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Khvan D.S.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Sirota D.A.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Zhulkov M.O.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Bozorov S.Sh.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Chernyavskiy A.M.

National Medical Research Center

Received:

02.12.2021

Accepted:

04.06.2022

Close metadata

References:

  1. Zhbanov IV, Kiladze IZ, Uryuzhnikov VV, Shabalkin BV. Minimally invasive coronary surgery. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2019;12(5):377-385. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio201912051377
  2. Kolesov VI. Surgery of coronary arteries. L.: Medicine; 1977. (In Russ.).
  3. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Chan EY, et al. The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives. Future Cardiol. 2011;7(3):333-346.  https://doi.org/10.2217/fca.11.23
  4. McGinn JT Jr, Usman S, Lapierre H, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2009;120(11 suppl):78-84.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.840041
  5. Ibanez B, Iung B, Jeppsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS recommendations for myocardial revascularization. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2019;24(8):151-226. (In Russ.).
  6. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, et al. FREEDOM Trial Investigators. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(25):2375-2384. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211585
  7. Farid S, Ali JM, Stohlner V, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Single-Center Experience. Innovations. 2018;13(1):23-28.  https://doi.org/10.1097/imi.0000000000000466
  8. Barsoum EA, Azab B, Shah N, et al. Long-term mortality in minimally invasive compared with sternotomy coronary artery bypass surgery in the geriatric population (75 years and older patients). European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2015;47(5):862-867.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu267
  9. Kikuchi K, Mori M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017;25(5):364-370.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492317692465
  10. Puskas JD, Martin J, Cheng DC, et al. ISMICS Consensus Conference and Statements of Randomized Controlled Trials of Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2015;10(4):219-229.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000184
  11. Seki T, Yoshida T. Comparison of Mid-Term Graft Patency between On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23(3):141-148.  https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00302
  12. Guo MH, Wells GA, Glineur D, et al. Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: The MIST trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019;78:140-145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2019.01.006
  13. Lapierre H, Chan V, Sohmer B, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(4):804-810.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.066
  14. Shevchenko YuL, Borshchev GG, Ulbashev DS, Zemlyanov AV. Choice of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center. 2019;1(14):97-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25881/BPNMSC.2019.69.57.019
  15. Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation. 2014;130(7):539-545.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004255
  16. Nambiar P, Kumar S, Mittal CM, Sarkar IC. Outcomes of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Analogy to the SYNTAX Trial. Innovations (Phila). 2019;14(3):227-235.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1556984519837391
  17. West D, Lim E, Trimlett R, Flather M, Yap J, Pepper J, De Souza A. Determinants of successful endoscopic internal thoracic artery harvesting: a prospective analysis. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7(2):179-182.  https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041004
  18. Kikuchi K, Chen X, Mori M, Kurata A, Tao L. Perioperative outcomes of off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic arteries under direct vision†. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;24(5):696-701.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw431
  19. Chan V, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Handsewn proximal anastomoses onto the ascending aorta through a small left thoracotomy during minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: a stepwise approach to safety and reproducibility. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;24(1):79-83.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2011.12.010
  20. Ruel M, Shariff MA, Lapierre H, et al. Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(1):203-208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.016
  21. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council non cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation. 2005;111:2858-2864.
  22. Fischlein T. Commentary: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: Reawakening of a sleeping beauty? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(1):139-140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.081
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.